Cargando…

Clinical evaluation of the BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1 and detection of SARS-CoV-2

We evaluated the performance of the BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1 (RP2.1) in the detection of SARS CoV-2 in comparison against three other SARS CoV-2 EUA assays. In these studies, the RP2.1 panel had 98 % positive percent agreement (48/49) and 100 % negative percent agreement (49/49). Since 30 % of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Creager, Hannah M., Cabrera, Barbara, Schnaubelt, Andy, Cox, Jesse L., Cushman-Vokoun, Allison M., Shakir, Salika M., Tardif, Keith D., Huang, Meei-Li, Jerome, Keith R., Greninger, Alexander L., Drobysheva, Daria, Spaulding, Usha, Rogatcheva, Margarita, Bourzac, Kevin M., Hinrichs, S.H., Broadhurst, M.J., Fey, P.D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7336953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32650276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104538
_version_ 1783554419120406528
author Creager, Hannah M.
Cabrera, Barbara
Schnaubelt, Andy
Cox, Jesse L.
Cushman-Vokoun, Allison M.
Shakir, Salika M.
Tardif, Keith D.
Huang, Meei-Li
Jerome, Keith R.
Greninger, Alexander L.
Drobysheva, Daria
Spaulding, Usha
Rogatcheva, Margarita
Bourzac, Kevin M.
Hinrichs, S.H.
Broadhurst, M.J.
Fey, P.D.
author_facet Creager, Hannah M.
Cabrera, Barbara
Schnaubelt, Andy
Cox, Jesse L.
Cushman-Vokoun, Allison M.
Shakir, Salika M.
Tardif, Keith D.
Huang, Meei-Li
Jerome, Keith R.
Greninger, Alexander L.
Drobysheva, Daria
Spaulding, Usha
Rogatcheva, Margarita
Bourzac, Kevin M.
Hinrichs, S.H.
Broadhurst, M.J.
Fey, P.D.
author_sort Creager, Hannah M.
collection PubMed
description We evaluated the performance of the BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1 (RP2.1) in the detection of SARS CoV-2 in comparison against three other SARS CoV-2 EUA assays. In these studies, the RP2.1 panel had 98 % positive percent agreement (48/49) and 100 % negative percent agreement (49/49). Since 30 % of nasopharyngeal swab specimens have a SARS CoV-2 Ct >30 and thus detection of virus in low titers is clinically relevant, a sample with a high titer was diluted and each 10 fold dilution was tested in triplicate and compared against 6 other EUA approved SARS CoV-2 assays. These data suggested that the BioFire® RP2.1 panel, along with four other SARS CoV-2 assays (Roche cobas, Cepheid Xpert Xpress, BioFire® Defense COVID19, and NECoV19), consistently detected viral RNA at the 10−7 dilution. Overall, these studies suggest that the BioFire® RP2.1 assay can be used to detect acute cases of SARS CoV2 in addition to patients with low viral titer later in disease presentation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7336953
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73369532020-07-06 Clinical evaluation of the BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1 and detection of SARS-CoV-2 Creager, Hannah M. Cabrera, Barbara Schnaubelt, Andy Cox, Jesse L. Cushman-Vokoun, Allison M. Shakir, Salika M. Tardif, Keith D. Huang, Meei-Li Jerome, Keith R. Greninger, Alexander L. Drobysheva, Daria Spaulding, Usha Rogatcheva, Margarita Bourzac, Kevin M. Hinrichs, S.H. Broadhurst, M.J. Fey, P.D. J Clin Virol Article We evaluated the performance of the BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1 (RP2.1) in the detection of SARS CoV-2 in comparison against three other SARS CoV-2 EUA assays. In these studies, the RP2.1 panel had 98 % positive percent agreement (48/49) and 100 % negative percent agreement (49/49). Since 30 % of nasopharyngeal swab specimens have a SARS CoV-2 Ct >30 and thus detection of virus in low titers is clinically relevant, a sample with a high titer was diluted and each 10 fold dilution was tested in triplicate and compared against 6 other EUA approved SARS CoV-2 assays. These data suggested that the BioFire® RP2.1 panel, along with four other SARS CoV-2 assays (Roche cobas, Cepheid Xpert Xpress, BioFire® Defense COVID19, and NECoV19), consistently detected viral RNA at the 10−7 dilution. Overall, these studies suggest that the BioFire® RP2.1 assay can be used to detect acute cases of SARS CoV2 in addition to patients with low viral titer later in disease presentation. The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2020-08 2020-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7336953/ /pubmed/32650276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104538 Text en © 2020 The Authors Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active.
spellingShingle Article
Creager, Hannah M.
Cabrera, Barbara
Schnaubelt, Andy
Cox, Jesse L.
Cushman-Vokoun, Allison M.
Shakir, Salika M.
Tardif, Keith D.
Huang, Meei-Li
Jerome, Keith R.
Greninger, Alexander L.
Drobysheva, Daria
Spaulding, Usha
Rogatcheva, Margarita
Bourzac, Kevin M.
Hinrichs, S.H.
Broadhurst, M.J.
Fey, P.D.
Clinical evaluation of the BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1 and detection of SARS-CoV-2
title Clinical evaluation of the BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1 and detection of SARS-CoV-2
title_full Clinical evaluation of the BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1 and detection of SARS-CoV-2
title_fullStr Clinical evaluation of the BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1 and detection of SARS-CoV-2
title_full_unstemmed Clinical evaluation of the BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1 and detection of SARS-CoV-2
title_short Clinical evaluation of the BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1 and detection of SARS-CoV-2
title_sort clinical evaluation of the biofire® respiratory panel 2.1 and detection of sars-cov-2
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7336953/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32650276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104538
work_keys_str_mv AT creagerhannahm clinicalevaluationofthebiofirerespiratorypanel21anddetectionofsarscov2
AT cabrerabarbara clinicalevaluationofthebiofirerespiratorypanel21anddetectionofsarscov2
AT schnaubeltandy clinicalevaluationofthebiofirerespiratorypanel21anddetectionofsarscov2
AT coxjessel clinicalevaluationofthebiofirerespiratorypanel21anddetectionofsarscov2
AT cushmanvokounallisonm clinicalevaluationofthebiofirerespiratorypanel21anddetectionofsarscov2
AT shakirsalikam clinicalevaluationofthebiofirerespiratorypanel21anddetectionofsarscov2
AT tardifkeithd clinicalevaluationofthebiofirerespiratorypanel21anddetectionofsarscov2
AT huangmeeili clinicalevaluationofthebiofirerespiratorypanel21anddetectionofsarscov2
AT jeromekeithr clinicalevaluationofthebiofirerespiratorypanel21anddetectionofsarscov2
AT greningeralexanderl clinicalevaluationofthebiofirerespiratorypanel21anddetectionofsarscov2
AT drobyshevadaria clinicalevaluationofthebiofirerespiratorypanel21anddetectionofsarscov2
AT spauldingusha clinicalevaluationofthebiofirerespiratorypanel21anddetectionofsarscov2
AT rogatchevamargarita clinicalevaluationofthebiofirerespiratorypanel21anddetectionofsarscov2
AT bourzackevinm clinicalevaluationofthebiofirerespiratorypanel21anddetectionofsarscov2
AT hinrichssh clinicalevaluationofthebiofirerespiratorypanel21anddetectionofsarscov2
AT broadhurstmj clinicalevaluationofthebiofirerespiratorypanel21anddetectionofsarscov2
AT feypd clinicalevaluationofthebiofirerespiratorypanel21anddetectionofsarscov2