Cargando…
Clinical evaluation of the BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1 and detection of SARS-CoV-2
We evaluated the performance of the BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1 (RP2.1) in the detection of SARS CoV-2 in comparison against three other SARS CoV-2 EUA assays. In these studies, the RP2.1 panel had 98 % positive percent agreement (48/49) and 100 % negative percent agreement (49/49). Since 30 % of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7336953/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32650276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104538 |
_version_ | 1783554419120406528 |
---|---|
author | Creager, Hannah M. Cabrera, Barbara Schnaubelt, Andy Cox, Jesse L. Cushman-Vokoun, Allison M. Shakir, Salika M. Tardif, Keith D. Huang, Meei-Li Jerome, Keith R. Greninger, Alexander L. Drobysheva, Daria Spaulding, Usha Rogatcheva, Margarita Bourzac, Kevin M. Hinrichs, S.H. Broadhurst, M.J. Fey, P.D. |
author_facet | Creager, Hannah M. Cabrera, Barbara Schnaubelt, Andy Cox, Jesse L. Cushman-Vokoun, Allison M. Shakir, Salika M. Tardif, Keith D. Huang, Meei-Li Jerome, Keith R. Greninger, Alexander L. Drobysheva, Daria Spaulding, Usha Rogatcheva, Margarita Bourzac, Kevin M. Hinrichs, S.H. Broadhurst, M.J. Fey, P.D. |
author_sort | Creager, Hannah M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | We evaluated the performance of the BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1 (RP2.1) in the detection of SARS CoV-2 in comparison against three other SARS CoV-2 EUA assays. In these studies, the RP2.1 panel had 98 % positive percent agreement (48/49) and 100 % negative percent agreement (49/49). Since 30 % of nasopharyngeal swab specimens have a SARS CoV-2 Ct >30 and thus detection of virus in low titers is clinically relevant, a sample with a high titer was diluted and each 10 fold dilution was tested in triplicate and compared against 6 other EUA approved SARS CoV-2 assays. These data suggested that the BioFire® RP2.1 panel, along with four other SARS CoV-2 assays (Roche cobas, Cepheid Xpert Xpress, BioFire® Defense COVID19, and NECoV19), consistently detected viral RNA at the 10−7 dilution. Overall, these studies suggest that the BioFire® RP2.1 assay can be used to detect acute cases of SARS CoV2 in addition to patients with low viral titer later in disease presentation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7336953 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73369532020-07-06 Clinical evaluation of the BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1 and detection of SARS-CoV-2 Creager, Hannah M. Cabrera, Barbara Schnaubelt, Andy Cox, Jesse L. Cushman-Vokoun, Allison M. Shakir, Salika M. Tardif, Keith D. Huang, Meei-Li Jerome, Keith R. Greninger, Alexander L. Drobysheva, Daria Spaulding, Usha Rogatcheva, Margarita Bourzac, Kevin M. Hinrichs, S.H. Broadhurst, M.J. Fey, P.D. J Clin Virol Article We evaluated the performance of the BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1 (RP2.1) in the detection of SARS CoV-2 in comparison against three other SARS CoV-2 EUA assays. In these studies, the RP2.1 panel had 98 % positive percent agreement (48/49) and 100 % negative percent agreement (49/49). Since 30 % of nasopharyngeal swab specimens have a SARS CoV-2 Ct >30 and thus detection of virus in low titers is clinically relevant, a sample with a high titer was diluted and each 10 fold dilution was tested in triplicate and compared against 6 other EUA approved SARS CoV-2 assays. These data suggested that the BioFire® RP2.1 panel, along with four other SARS CoV-2 assays (Roche cobas, Cepheid Xpert Xpress, BioFire® Defense COVID19, and NECoV19), consistently detected viral RNA at the 10−7 dilution. Overall, these studies suggest that the BioFire® RP2.1 assay can be used to detect acute cases of SARS CoV2 in addition to patients with low viral titer later in disease presentation. The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. 2020-08 2020-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7336953/ /pubmed/32650276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104538 Text en © 2020 The Authors Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Creager, Hannah M. Cabrera, Barbara Schnaubelt, Andy Cox, Jesse L. Cushman-Vokoun, Allison M. Shakir, Salika M. Tardif, Keith D. Huang, Meei-Li Jerome, Keith R. Greninger, Alexander L. Drobysheva, Daria Spaulding, Usha Rogatcheva, Margarita Bourzac, Kevin M. Hinrichs, S.H. Broadhurst, M.J. Fey, P.D. Clinical evaluation of the BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1 and detection of SARS-CoV-2 |
title | Clinical evaluation of the BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1 and detection of SARS-CoV-2 |
title_full | Clinical evaluation of the BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1 and detection of SARS-CoV-2 |
title_fullStr | Clinical evaluation of the BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1 and detection of SARS-CoV-2 |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical evaluation of the BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1 and detection of SARS-CoV-2 |
title_short | Clinical evaluation of the BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1 and detection of SARS-CoV-2 |
title_sort | clinical evaluation of the biofire® respiratory panel 2.1 and detection of sars-cov-2 |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7336953/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32650276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104538 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT creagerhannahm clinicalevaluationofthebiofirerespiratorypanel21anddetectionofsarscov2 AT cabrerabarbara clinicalevaluationofthebiofirerespiratorypanel21anddetectionofsarscov2 AT schnaubeltandy clinicalevaluationofthebiofirerespiratorypanel21anddetectionofsarscov2 AT coxjessel clinicalevaluationofthebiofirerespiratorypanel21anddetectionofsarscov2 AT cushmanvokounallisonm clinicalevaluationofthebiofirerespiratorypanel21anddetectionofsarscov2 AT shakirsalikam clinicalevaluationofthebiofirerespiratorypanel21anddetectionofsarscov2 AT tardifkeithd clinicalevaluationofthebiofirerespiratorypanel21anddetectionofsarscov2 AT huangmeeili clinicalevaluationofthebiofirerespiratorypanel21anddetectionofsarscov2 AT jeromekeithr clinicalevaluationofthebiofirerespiratorypanel21anddetectionofsarscov2 AT greningeralexanderl clinicalevaluationofthebiofirerespiratorypanel21anddetectionofsarscov2 AT drobyshevadaria clinicalevaluationofthebiofirerespiratorypanel21anddetectionofsarscov2 AT spauldingusha clinicalevaluationofthebiofirerespiratorypanel21anddetectionofsarscov2 AT rogatchevamargarita clinicalevaluationofthebiofirerespiratorypanel21anddetectionofsarscov2 AT bourzackevinm clinicalevaluationofthebiofirerespiratorypanel21anddetectionofsarscov2 AT hinrichssh clinicalevaluationofthebiofirerespiratorypanel21anddetectionofsarscov2 AT broadhurstmj clinicalevaluationofthebiofirerespiratorypanel21anddetectionofsarscov2 AT feypd clinicalevaluationofthebiofirerespiratorypanel21anddetectionofsarscov2 |