Cargando…
Intravitreal Injections of Bevacizumab Plus Methotrexate versus Bevacizumab Alone for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial
PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) combined with intravitreal methotrexate (IVM) in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: In this prospective, interventional contralateral eye study, patients with bilateral DME were randomly allocated to receive thr...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7337024/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32671300 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JOCO.JOCO_101_20 |
_version_ | 1783554435457220608 |
---|---|
author | Fazel, Farhad Oliya, Behrooz Mirmohammadkhani, Majid Fazel, Mohammadreza Yadegarfar, Ghasem Pourazizi, Mohsen |
author_facet | Fazel, Farhad Oliya, Behrooz Mirmohammadkhani, Majid Fazel, Mohammadreza Yadegarfar, Ghasem Pourazizi, Mohsen |
author_sort | Fazel, Farhad |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) combined with intravitreal methotrexate (IVM) in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: In this prospective, interventional contralateral eye study, patients with bilateral DME were randomly allocated to receive three monthly injections of IVB (1.25 mg/0.05 mL) plus IVM (400 μg; 0.16 cc) or IVB alone. The outcome measure was changes in the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and central macular volume (CMV). RESULTS: Thirty-six treatment-naive eyes of 18 patients with a mean age of 62.38 ± 6.2 years were included in the study. BCVA logMAR changed from 0.95 ± 0.53 at baseline to 0.75 ± 0.53 in the combination group and from 0.72 ± 0.57 to 0.49 ± 0.50 in the IVB alone group at 1 month after the 3(rd) injection. BCVA improvement in both groups was not statistically significant compared with the baseline value (P > 0.99). Compared with the baseline values, mean CMT and CMV were reduced in both groups; however, these changes did not reach a significant level. The differences of CMT changes between the groups were not statistically significant at month 1 (P = 0.82), month 2 (P = 0.21), and month 3 (P = 0.10). Furthermore, the differences of CMV changes between the groups were not statistically significant at month 1 (P = 0.76), month 2 (P = 0.82), and month 3 (P = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrated no significant therapeutic effects for IVB combined with IVM compared to IVB alone in treatment-naive DME patients over a 3-month course. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7337024 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73370242020-07-14 Intravitreal Injections of Bevacizumab Plus Methotrexate versus Bevacizumab Alone for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial Fazel, Farhad Oliya, Behrooz Mirmohammadkhani, Majid Fazel, Mohammadreza Yadegarfar, Ghasem Pourazizi, Mohsen J Curr Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) combined with intravitreal methotrexate (IVM) in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: In this prospective, interventional contralateral eye study, patients with bilateral DME were randomly allocated to receive three monthly injections of IVB (1.25 mg/0.05 mL) plus IVM (400 μg; 0.16 cc) or IVB alone. The outcome measure was changes in the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and central macular volume (CMV). RESULTS: Thirty-six treatment-naive eyes of 18 patients with a mean age of 62.38 ± 6.2 years were included in the study. BCVA logMAR changed from 0.95 ± 0.53 at baseline to 0.75 ± 0.53 in the combination group and from 0.72 ± 0.57 to 0.49 ± 0.50 in the IVB alone group at 1 month after the 3(rd) injection. BCVA improvement in both groups was not statistically significant compared with the baseline value (P > 0.99). Compared with the baseline values, mean CMT and CMV were reduced in both groups; however, these changes did not reach a significant level. The differences of CMT changes between the groups were not statistically significant at month 1 (P = 0.82), month 2 (P = 0.21), and month 3 (P = 0.10). Furthermore, the differences of CMV changes between the groups were not statistically significant at month 1 (P = 0.76), month 2 (P = 0.82), and month 3 (P = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrated no significant therapeutic effects for IVB combined with IVM compared to IVB alone in treatment-naive DME patients over a 3-month course. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7337024/ /pubmed/32671300 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JOCO.JOCO_101_20 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Current Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Fazel, Farhad Oliya, Behrooz Mirmohammadkhani, Majid Fazel, Mohammadreza Yadegarfar, Ghasem Pourazizi, Mohsen Intravitreal Injections of Bevacizumab Plus Methotrexate versus Bevacizumab Alone for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial |
title | Intravitreal Injections of Bevacizumab Plus Methotrexate versus Bevacizumab Alone for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial |
title_full | Intravitreal Injections of Bevacizumab Plus Methotrexate versus Bevacizumab Alone for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Intravitreal Injections of Bevacizumab Plus Methotrexate versus Bevacizumab Alone for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Intravitreal Injections of Bevacizumab Plus Methotrexate versus Bevacizumab Alone for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial |
title_short | Intravitreal Injections of Bevacizumab Plus Methotrexate versus Bevacizumab Alone for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial |
title_sort | intravitreal injections of bevacizumab plus methotrexate versus bevacizumab alone for the treatment of diabetic macular edema: a randomized, sham-controlled trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7337024/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32671300 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JOCO.JOCO_101_20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fazelfarhad intravitrealinjectionsofbevacizumabplusmethotrexateversusbevacizumabaloneforthetreatmentofdiabeticmacularedemaarandomizedshamcontrolledtrial AT oliyabehrooz intravitrealinjectionsofbevacizumabplusmethotrexateversusbevacizumabaloneforthetreatmentofdiabeticmacularedemaarandomizedshamcontrolledtrial AT mirmohammadkhanimajid intravitrealinjectionsofbevacizumabplusmethotrexateversusbevacizumabaloneforthetreatmentofdiabeticmacularedemaarandomizedshamcontrolledtrial AT fazelmohammadreza intravitrealinjectionsofbevacizumabplusmethotrexateversusbevacizumabaloneforthetreatmentofdiabeticmacularedemaarandomizedshamcontrolledtrial AT yadegarfarghasem intravitrealinjectionsofbevacizumabplusmethotrexateversusbevacizumabaloneforthetreatmentofdiabeticmacularedemaarandomizedshamcontrolledtrial AT pourazizimohsen intravitrealinjectionsofbevacizumabplusmethotrexateversusbevacizumabaloneforthetreatmentofdiabeticmacularedemaarandomizedshamcontrolledtrial |