Cargando…

Intravitreal Injections of Bevacizumab Plus Methotrexate versus Bevacizumab Alone for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) combined with intravitreal methotrexate (IVM) in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: In this prospective, interventional contralateral eye study, patients with bilateral DME were randomly allocated to receive thr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fazel, Farhad, Oliya, Behrooz, Mirmohammadkhani, Majid, Fazel, Mohammadreza, Yadegarfar, Ghasem, Pourazizi, Mohsen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7337024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32671300
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JOCO.JOCO_101_20
_version_ 1783554435457220608
author Fazel, Farhad
Oliya, Behrooz
Mirmohammadkhani, Majid
Fazel, Mohammadreza
Yadegarfar, Ghasem
Pourazizi, Mohsen
author_facet Fazel, Farhad
Oliya, Behrooz
Mirmohammadkhani, Majid
Fazel, Mohammadreza
Yadegarfar, Ghasem
Pourazizi, Mohsen
author_sort Fazel, Farhad
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) combined with intravitreal methotrexate (IVM) in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: In this prospective, interventional contralateral eye study, patients with bilateral DME were randomly allocated to receive three monthly injections of IVB (1.25 mg/0.05 mL) plus IVM (400 μg; 0.16 cc) or IVB alone. The outcome measure was changes in the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and central macular volume (CMV). RESULTS: Thirty-six treatment-naive eyes of 18 patients with a mean age of 62.38 ± 6.2 years were included in the study. BCVA logMAR changed from 0.95 ± 0.53 at baseline to 0.75 ± 0.53 in the combination group and from 0.72 ± 0.57 to 0.49 ± 0.50 in the IVB alone group at 1 month after the 3(rd) injection. BCVA improvement in both groups was not statistically significant compared with the baseline value (P > 0.99). Compared with the baseline values, mean CMT and CMV were reduced in both groups; however, these changes did not reach a significant level. The differences of CMT changes between the groups were not statistically significant at month 1 (P = 0.82), month 2 (P = 0.21), and month 3 (P = 0.10). Furthermore, the differences of CMV changes between the groups were not statistically significant at month 1 (P = 0.76), month 2 (P = 0.82), and month 3 (P = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrated no significant therapeutic effects for IVB combined with IVM compared to IVB alone in treatment-naive DME patients over a 3-month course.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7337024
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73370242020-07-14 Intravitreal Injections of Bevacizumab Plus Methotrexate versus Bevacizumab Alone for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial Fazel, Farhad Oliya, Behrooz Mirmohammadkhani, Majid Fazel, Mohammadreza Yadegarfar, Ghasem Pourazizi, Mohsen J Curr Ophthalmol Original Article PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) combined with intravitreal methotrexate (IVM) in the treatment of diabetic macular edema (DME). METHODS: In this prospective, interventional contralateral eye study, patients with bilateral DME were randomly allocated to receive three monthly injections of IVB (1.25 mg/0.05 mL) plus IVM (400 μg; 0.16 cc) or IVB alone. The outcome measure was changes in the best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and central macular volume (CMV). RESULTS: Thirty-six treatment-naive eyes of 18 patients with a mean age of 62.38 ± 6.2 years were included in the study. BCVA logMAR changed from 0.95 ± 0.53 at baseline to 0.75 ± 0.53 in the combination group and from 0.72 ± 0.57 to 0.49 ± 0.50 in the IVB alone group at 1 month after the 3(rd) injection. BCVA improvement in both groups was not statistically significant compared with the baseline value (P > 0.99). Compared with the baseline values, mean CMT and CMV were reduced in both groups; however, these changes did not reach a significant level. The differences of CMT changes between the groups were not statistically significant at month 1 (P = 0.82), month 2 (P = 0.21), and month 3 (P = 0.10). Furthermore, the differences of CMV changes between the groups were not statistically significant at month 1 (P = 0.76), month 2 (P = 0.82), and month 3 (P = 0.11). CONCLUSIONS: This pilot study demonstrated no significant therapeutic effects for IVB combined with IVM compared to IVB alone in treatment-naive DME patients over a 3-month course. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7337024/ /pubmed/32671300 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JOCO.JOCO_101_20 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Current Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Fazel, Farhad
Oliya, Behrooz
Mirmohammadkhani, Majid
Fazel, Mohammadreza
Yadegarfar, Ghasem
Pourazizi, Mohsen
Intravitreal Injections of Bevacizumab Plus Methotrexate versus Bevacizumab Alone for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial
title Intravitreal Injections of Bevacizumab Plus Methotrexate versus Bevacizumab Alone for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial
title_full Intravitreal Injections of Bevacizumab Plus Methotrexate versus Bevacizumab Alone for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Intravitreal Injections of Bevacizumab Plus Methotrexate versus Bevacizumab Alone for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Intravitreal Injections of Bevacizumab Plus Methotrexate versus Bevacizumab Alone for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial
title_short Intravitreal Injections of Bevacizumab Plus Methotrexate versus Bevacizumab Alone for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled Trial
title_sort intravitreal injections of bevacizumab plus methotrexate versus bevacizumab alone for the treatment of diabetic macular edema: a randomized, sham-controlled trial
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7337024/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32671300
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JOCO.JOCO_101_20
work_keys_str_mv AT fazelfarhad intravitrealinjectionsofbevacizumabplusmethotrexateversusbevacizumabaloneforthetreatmentofdiabeticmacularedemaarandomizedshamcontrolledtrial
AT oliyabehrooz intravitrealinjectionsofbevacizumabplusmethotrexateversusbevacizumabaloneforthetreatmentofdiabeticmacularedemaarandomizedshamcontrolledtrial
AT mirmohammadkhanimajid intravitrealinjectionsofbevacizumabplusmethotrexateversusbevacizumabaloneforthetreatmentofdiabeticmacularedemaarandomizedshamcontrolledtrial
AT fazelmohammadreza intravitrealinjectionsofbevacizumabplusmethotrexateversusbevacizumabaloneforthetreatmentofdiabeticmacularedemaarandomizedshamcontrolledtrial
AT yadegarfarghasem intravitrealinjectionsofbevacizumabplusmethotrexateversusbevacizumabaloneforthetreatmentofdiabeticmacularedemaarandomizedshamcontrolledtrial
AT pourazizimohsen intravitrealinjectionsofbevacizumabplusmethotrexateversusbevacizumabaloneforthetreatmentofdiabeticmacularedemaarandomizedshamcontrolledtrial