Implementation of less invasive surfactant administration in clinical practice—Experience of a mid-sized country

OBJECTIVE: There are differences in the adoption rates of less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) worldwide. We aimed to describe and analyze the process of LISA introduction at the country level. METHODS: A standardized training program (33 courses covering >500 neonatologists) was followed by a cohort study. Data regarding consecutive LISA procedures were acquired over 12 months in 31 tertiary neonatal centers, using a dedicated on-line platform. RESULTS: Of 500 LISA procedures, 75% were performed by specialists and 25% by residents. The mean percentage share of LISA in all surfactant therapies was 24%, which represents a 6-fold increase compared to previous years. After 12 months, 76% of the procedures were rated “easy/very easy” vs 59% at baseline (p<0.05). Surfactant re-treatment rate was 15%. Twenty-three percent of infants required mechanical ventilation within 72 hours of life. Oxygen desaturation and surfactant reflux were the most frequent complications. Unlike previous reports describing exclusive use of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) during LISA, majority of procedures (63%) were carried out using nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) or Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP). Efficacy of LISA with NIPPV or BiPAP was not significantly different from that with nCPAP (22.4% vs 24.5% of cases requiring intubation). Ventilation was provided with nasal cannulas or nasal masks (90%) and rarely with “RAM” cannulas or nasopharyngeal tubes. Rigid catheters were preferred (88.4%); tracheal insertion was successful at first attempt in 87% of cases. Majority of infants (79%) received no premedication prior to the procedure and almost all were given caffeine citrate. Median time of instillation was 1.5 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: The LISA procedure does not appear to be technically difficult to master. Training combining theory with practical exercises is an efficient implementation strategy. Variations in adoption rates indicate the need for additional, more personalized teachings in some centers.