Cargando…

Comparative Two-Photon Fluorescence Microscopy Analysis of Riboflavin Penetration in Two Different Solutions: Dextran and Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose

PURPOSE: This study compared riboflavin penetration in porcine corneas using two different solutions: dextran and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC). METHODS: Porcine corneas were de-swollen and after prepared in an artificial anterior chamber with balanced saline solution. The pressure was checke...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Paula, Thales Antonio Abra, Cresta, Fernando Betty, Alves, Milton Ruiz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7337433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32669833
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S258603
_version_ 1783554508440207360
author De Paula, Thales Antonio Abra
Cresta, Fernando Betty
Alves, Milton Ruiz
author_facet De Paula, Thales Antonio Abra
Cresta, Fernando Betty
Alves, Milton Ruiz
author_sort De Paula, Thales Antonio Abra
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: This study compared riboflavin penetration in porcine corneas using two different solutions: dextran and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC). METHODS: Porcine corneas were de-swollen and after prepared in an artificial anterior chamber with balanced saline solution. The pressure was checked with a portable tonometer. We used 0.1% riboflavin in 20% dextran for 30 min or 0.1% riboflavin in 1% HPMC for 10 min. The fluorescence intensity in multiphoton microscopy was used to evaluate concentration into the cornea, and ultrasonic pachymetry was performed before and after using riboflavin. RESULTS: Riboflavin concentration up to 340 μm was higher in the HPMC group (p 0.146). From 340 microns to 500 μm, the concentration was higher in the dextran group (p 0.248). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups when considering all the corneal thickness studied (p 0.528). Pachymetric measurements in the group with dextran showed a 12.9% corneal thickness decrease after 30 min, while the HPMC group showed a 9.1% increase after 10 min. CONCLUSION: We concluded that 1% HPMC riboflavin for 10 min had the same level of safety when compared to the Dresden protocol with dextran riboflavin for 30 min. Ultrasonic pachymetry during corneal crosslinking has fundamental importance in controlling corneal hydration due to changes in thickness caused by different types of riboflavin. This study used different methods than previous studies to better simulate corneal physiological conditions and used 1% HPMC concentration which differs from previous studies performed with 1.1% HPMC.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7337433
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Dove
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73374332020-07-14 Comparative Two-Photon Fluorescence Microscopy Analysis of Riboflavin Penetration in Two Different Solutions: Dextran and Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose De Paula, Thales Antonio Abra Cresta, Fernando Betty Alves, Milton Ruiz Clin Ophthalmol Original Research PURPOSE: This study compared riboflavin penetration in porcine corneas using two different solutions: dextran and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC). METHODS: Porcine corneas were de-swollen and after prepared in an artificial anterior chamber with balanced saline solution. The pressure was checked with a portable tonometer. We used 0.1% riboflavin in 20% dextran for 30 min or 0.1% riboflavin in 1% HPMC for 10 min. The fluorescence intensity in multiphoton microscopy was used to evaluate concentration into the cornea, and ultrasonic pachymetry was performed before and after using riboflavin. RESULTS: Riboflavin concentration up to 340 μm was higher in the HPMC group (p 0.146). From 340 microns to 500 μm, the concentration was higher in the dextran group (p 0.248). There was no statistically significant difference between the groups when considering all the corneal thickness studied (p 0.528). Pachymetric measurements in the group with dextran showed a 12.9% corneal thickness decrease after 30 min, while the HPMC group showed a 9.1% increase after 10 min. CONCLUSION: We concluded that 1% HPMC riboflavin for 10 min had the same level of safety when compared to the Dresden protocol with dextran riboflavin for 30 min. Ultrasonic pachymetry during corneal crosslinking has fundamental importance in controlling corneal hydration due to changes in thickness caused by different types of riboflavin. This study used different methods than previous studies to better simulate corneal physiological conditions and used 1% HPMC concentration which differs from previous studies performed with 1.1% HPMC. Dove 2020-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7337433/ /pubmed/32669833 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S258603 Text en © 2020 De Paula et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).
spellingShingle Original Research
De Paula, Thales Antonio Abra
Cresta, Fernando Betty
Alves, Milton Ruiz
Comparative Two-Photon Fluorescence Microscopy Analysis of Riboflavin Penetration in Two Different Solutions: Dextran and Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose
title Comparative Two-Photon Fluorescence Microscopy Analysis of Riboflavin Penetration in Two Different Solutions: Dextran and Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose
title_full Comparative Two-Photon Fluorescence Microscopy Analysis of Riboflavin Penetration in Two Different Solutions: Dextran and Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose
title_fullStr Comparative Two-Photon Fluorescence Microscopy Analysis of Riboflavin Penetration in Two Different Solutions: Dextran and Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Two-Photon Fluorescence Microscopy Analysis of Riboflavin Penetration in Two Different Solutions: Dextran and Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose
title_short Comparative Two-Photon Fluorescence Microscopy Analysis of Riboflavin Penetration in Two Different Solutions: Dextran and Hydroxypropyl Methylcellulose
title_sort comparative two-photon fluorescence microscopy analysis of riboflavin penetration in two different solutions: dextran and hydroxypropyl methylcellulose
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7337433/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32669833
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S258603
work_keys_str_mv AT depaulathalesantonioabra comparativetwophotonfluorescencemicroscopyanalysisofriboflavinpenetrationintwodifferentsolutionsdextranandhydroxypropylmethylcellulose
AT crestafernandobetty comparativetwophotonfluorescencemicroscopyanalysisofriboflavinpenetrationintwodifferentsolutionsdextranandhydroxypropylmethylcellulose
AT alvesmiltonruiz comparativetwophotonfluorescencemicroscopyanalysisofriboflavinpenetrationintwodifferentsolutionsdextranandhydroxypropylmethylcellulose