Cargando…

Twice-daily vs higher-dose once-daily thoracic radiotherapy for limited-disease small-cell lung cancer: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: The optimal dose and fractionation of thoracic radiotherapy (RT) for limited-disease small-cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC) remain controversial. This meta-analysis was performed to compare the efficacy and RT toxicity between twice-daily thoracic RT (45 Gy with 1.5 Gy twice daily) and highe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Lin, Liu, Libo, Yang, Yanjie, Lei, Yao, Wang, Tianyi, Wu, Xiaocui, Guo, Xiaoling
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer Health 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7337461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32629632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000020518
_version_ 1783554516294041600
author Yang, Lin
Liu, Libo
Yang, Yanjie
Lei, Yao
Wang, Tianyi
Wu, Xiaocui
Guo, Xiaoling
author_facet Yang, Lin
Liu, Libo
Yang, Yanjie
Lei, Yao
Wang, Tianyi
Wu, Xiaocui
Guo, Xiaoling
author_sort Yang, Lin
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The optimal dose and fractionation of thoracic radiotherapy (RT) for limited-disease small-cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC) remain controversial. This meta-analysis was performed to compare the efficacy and RT toxicity between twice-daily thoracic RT (45 Gy with 1.5 Gy twice daily) and higher-dose once-daily RT (60–72 Gy with 1.8 Gy/2 Gy once daily) administered with chemotherapy in LD-SCLC patients. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched up to March 19, 2020 for studies that compared twice-daily thoracic RT (45 Gy with 1.5 Gy twice daily over 3 weeks) with higher-dose once-daily RT (60–72 Gy with 1.8 Gy/2 Gy once daily over 6–8 weeks) in LD-SCLC patients. RESULTS: Five studies involving 13,726 patients were included in this analysis. Compared with the once-daily thoracic RT group, the 1-year overall survival (OS) rate (P < .001), the 2-year OS rate (P < .001), the 5-year OS rate (P < .001), the mOS (P < .001), and the 1-year LRFS rate (P = .048) were significantly improved in the twice-daily RT group. The toxic effects of RT (esophagitis: P = .293; pneumonitis: P = .103) were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Compared with the higher-dose once-daily regimen, the twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy regimen improved efficacy but did not increase RT toxicity in LD-SCLC patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7337461
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer Health
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73374612020-07-14 Twice-daily vs higher-dose once-daily thoracic radiotherapy for limited-disease small-cell lung cancer: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis Yang, Lin Liu, Libo Yang, Yanjie Lei, Yao Wang, Tianyi Wu, Xiaocui Guo, Xiaoling Medicine (Baltimore) 5700 INTRODUCTION: The optimal dose and fractionation of thoracic radiotherapy (RT) for limited-disease small-cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC) remain controversial. This meta-analysis was performed to compare the efficacy and RT toxicity between twice-daily thoracic RT (45 Gy with 1.5 Gy twice daily) and higher-dose once-daily RT (60–72 Gy with 1.8 Gy/2 Gy once daily) administered with chemotherapy in LD-SCLC patients. METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library were searched up to March 19, 2020 for studies that compared twice-daily thoracic RT (45 Gy with 1.5 Gy twice daily over 3 weeks) with higher-dose once-daily RT (60–72 Gy with 1.8 Gy/2 Gy once daily over 6–8 weeks) in LD-SCLC patients. RESULTS: Five studies involving 13,726 patients were included in this analysis. Compared with the once-daily thoracic RT group, the 1-year overall survival (OS) rate (P < .001), the 2-year OS rate (P < .001), the 5-year OS rate (P < .001), the mOS (P < .001), and the 1-year LRFS rate (P = .048) were significantly improved in the twice-daily RT group. The toxic effects of RT (esophagitis: P = .293; pneumonitis: P = .103) were similar in both groups. CONCLUSION: Compared with the higher-dose once-daily regimen, the twice-daily thoracic radiotherapy regimen improved efficacy but did not increase RT toxicity in LD-SCLC patients. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7337461/ /pubmed/32629632 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000020518 Text en Copyright © 2020 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC), where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
spellingShingle 5700
Yang, Lin
Liu, Libo
Yang, Yanjie
Lei, Yao
Wang, Tianyi
Wu, Xiaocui
Guo, Xiaoling
Twice-daily vs higher-dose once-daily thoracic radiotherapy for limited-disease small-cell lung cancer: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis
title Twice-daily vs higher-dose once-daily thoracic radiotherapy for limited-disease small-cell lung cancer: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis
title_full Twice-daily vs higher-dose once-daily thoracic radiotherapy for limited-disease small-cell lung cancer: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis
title_fullStr Twice-daily vs higher-dose once-daily thoracic radiotherapy for limited-disease small-cell lung cancer: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Twice-daily vs higher-dose once-daily thoracic radiotherapy for limited-disease small-cell lung cancer: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis
title_short Twice-daily vs higher-dose once-daily thoracic radiotherapy for limited-disease small-cell lung cancer: A PRISMA-compliant meta-analysis
title_sort twice-daily vs higher-dose once-daily thoracic radiotherapy for limited-disease small-cell lung cancer: a prisma-compliant meta-analysis
topic 5700
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7337461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32629632
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000020518
work_keys_str_mv AT yanglin twicedailyvshigherdoseoncedailythoracicradiotherapyforlimiteddiseasesmallcelllungcanceraprismacompliantmetaanalysis
AT liulibo twicedailyvshigherdoseoncedailythoracicradiotherapyforlimiteddiseasesmallcelllungcanceraprismacompliantmetaanalysis
AT yangyanjie twicedailyvshigherdoseoncedailythoracicradiotherapyforlimiteddiseasesmallcelllungcanceraprismacompliantmetaanalysis
AT leiyao twicedailyvshigherdoseoncedailythoracicradiotherapyforlimiteddiseasesmallcelllungcanceraprismacompliantmetaanalysis
AT wangtianyi twicedailyvshigherdoseoncedailythoracicradiotherapyforlimiteddiseasesmallcelllungcanceraprismacompliantmetaanalysis
AT wuxiaocui twicedailyvshigherdoseoncedailythoracicradiotherapyforlimiteddiseasesmallcelllungcanceraprismacompliantmetaanalysis
AT guoxiaoling twicedailyvshigherdoseoncedailythoracicradiotherapyforlimiteddiseasesmallcelllungcanceraprismacompliantmetaanalysis