Cargando…

Does clinical findings correlate with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in patients with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain? A cross sectional study

BACKGROUND: Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) helps to clearly visualize the disorders in temporomandibular joint (TMJ), the relationship between cross-sectional and clinical findings has not been precisely established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between clinical...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Koca, Cansu Gül, Gümrükçü, Zeynep, Bilgir, Elif
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7338075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32134894
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.23501
_version_ 1783554603922489344
author Koca, Cansu Gül
Gümrükçü, Zeynep
Bilgir, Elif
author_facet Koca, Cansu Gül
Gümrükçü, Zeynep
Bilgir, Elif
author_sort Koca, Cansu Gül
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) helps to clearly visualize the disorders in temporomandibular joint (TMJ), the relationship between cross-sectional and clinical findings has not been precisely established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between clinical symptoms and MRI findings in individuals with TMJ pain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study, conducted on the clinical and MRI findings of the patients, who applied to Uşak University, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinic with TMJ pain between the years 2016-2019. The primary predictor variables were MRI findings; disc position (normal, disc displacement with reduction (DDWR), disc displacement without reduction (DDWOR)), disc structural distortion (normal, folded, lengthened, round, biconvex, thick), condyle degeneration type (normal, moderate, severe) and joint effusion (JE) (absent, present). The primary outcome variable was pain, recorded on a visual analog scale (VAS) (numbered between 0-10). The other variables were demographic variables (age/gender). The relationship between clinical and MRI findings were statistically evaluated. The data were analysed by Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney U test. Chi-square (x2) test was used for categorical variable comparisons. P values < .05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. RESULTS: Clinical and MRI records of 700 TMJ, from 350 patients with the mean age of the 31 (12-65) were evaluated in this study. Statistically significant differences were found between; disc position and pain, disc position and JE; JE and pain; disc structural distortion and pain; and disc structural distortion and disc position. JE was seen more common in DDWOR group. The most common disc distortion, seen in patients with JE, is the folded type. CONCLUSIONS: The present study can infer that pain is associated with disc position, JE, disc structural distortion, and DDWOR is associated with JE. Folded type disc is the most common disc type in TMJ with JE. Key words:Internal derangement, TMJ, MRI evaluation, disc morphology, disc position, condyle degeneration, joint effusion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7338075
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73380752020-07-13 Does clinical findings correlate with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in patients with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain? A cross sectional study Koca, Cansu Gül Gümrükçü, Zeynep Bilgir, Elif Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal Research BACKGROUND: Although magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) helps to clearly visualize the disorders in temporomandibular joint (TMJ), the relationship between cross-sectional and clinical findings has not been precisely established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between clinical symptoms and MRI findings in individuals with TMJ pain. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study, conducted on the clinical and MRI findings of the patients, who applied to Uşak University, Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Clinic with TMJ pain between the years 2016-2019. The primary predictor variables were MRI findings; disc position (normal, disc displacement with reduction (DDWR), disc displacement without reduction (DDWOR)), disc structural distortion (normal, folded, lengthened, round, biconvex, thick), condyle degeneration type (normal, moderate, severe) and joint effusion (JE) (absent, present). The primary outcome variable was pain, recorded on a visual analog scale (VAS) (numbered between 0-10). The other variables were demographic variables (age/gender). The relationship between clinical and MRI findings were statistically evaluated. The data were analysed by Kruskal Wallis and Mann Whitney U test. Chi-square (x2) test was used for categorical variable comparisons. P values < .05 were considered to indicate statistical significance. RESULTS: Clinical and MRI records of 700 TMJ, from 350 patients with the mean age of the 31 (12-65) were evaluated in this study. Statistically significant differences were found between; disc position and pain, disc position and JE; JE and pain; disc structural distortion and pain; and disc structural distortion and disc position. JE was seen more common in DDWOR group. The most common disc distortion, seen in patients with JE, is the folded type. CONCLUSIONS: The present study can infer that pain is associated with disc position, JE, disc structural distortion, and DDWOR is associated with JE. Folded type disc is the most common disc type in TMJ with JE. Key words:Internal derangement, TMJ, MRI evaluation, disc morphology, disc position, condyle degeneration, joint effusion. Medicina Oral S.L. 2020-07 2020-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7338075/ /pubmed/32134894 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.23501 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Koca, Cansu Gül
Gümrükçü, Zeynep
Bilgir, Elif
Does clinical findings correlate with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in patients with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain? A cross sectional study
title Does clinical findings correlate with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in patients with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain? A cross sectional study
title_full Does clinical findings correlate with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in patients with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain? A cross sectional study
title_fullStr Does clinical findings correlate with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in patients with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain? A cross sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Does clinical findings correlate with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in patients with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain? A cross sectional study
title_short Does clinical findings correlate with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in patients with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) pain? A cross sectional study
title_sort does clinical findings correlate with magnetic resonance imaging (mri) findings in patients with temporomandibular joint (tmj) pain? a cross sectional study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7338075/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32134894
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.23501
work_keys_str_mv AT kocacansugul doesclinicalfindingscorrelatewithmagneticresonanceimagingmrifindingsinpatientswithtemporomandibularjointtmjpainacrosssectionalstudy
AT gumrukcuzeynep doesclinicalfindingscorrelatewithmagneticresonanceimagingmrifindingsinpatientswithtemporomandibularjointtmjpainacrosssectionalstudy
AT bilgirelif doesclinicalfindingscorrelatewithmagneticresonanceimagingmrifindingsinpatientswithtemporomandibularjointtmjpainacrosssectionalstudy