Cargando…
Risk factors for endothelial cell loss after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK)
This study aimed to identify the risk factors for endothelial cell density (ECD) loss after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and analyse whether donor tissues from cold versus organ culture differ in terms of ECD loss after DMEK. Consecutive DMEK cases from a prospective database fo...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7338484/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32632151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68023-0 |
_version_ | 1783554688275185664 |
---|---|
author | Hayashi, Takahiko Schrittenlocher, Silvia Siebelmann, Sebastian Le, Viet Nhat Hung Matthaei, Mario Franklin, Jeremy Bachmann, Björn Cursiefen, Claus |
author_facet | Hayashi, Takahiko Schrittenlocher, Silvia Siebelmann, Sebastian Le, Viet Nhat Hung Matthaei, Mario Franklin, Jeremy Bachmann, Björn Cursiefen, Claus |
author_sort | Hayashi, Takahiko |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study aimed to identify the risk factors for endothelial cell density (ECD) loss after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and analyse whether donor tissues from cold versus organ culture differ in terms of ECD loss after DMEK. Consecutive DMEK cases from a prospective database for Fuchs’ endothelial corneal dystrophy were retrospectively analysed between 2011 and 2016 at the University of Cologne, and the possible risk factors for ECD loss, including patient-related factors, type of tamponade (air or 20% sulphur hexafluoride gas), type of surgery (triple DMEK or DMEK alone), re-bubbling, immune rejection, and donor-related factors were determined. Eight hundred and forty-one eyes were selected. There was no significant difference in the best-corrected visual acuity (logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution) and corneal thickness (P = 0.540 and P = 0.667) between groups. Immune reactions were more common in cold cultures (P = 0.019), but ECD loss (1 year after DMEK) was greater in organ cultures (38.3 ± 0.8%) than in cold cultures (34.7 ± 1.4%) (P = 0.022). Only re-bubbling was significantly associated with ECD loss (P < 0.001). Re-bubbling was found to be a key factor for ECD loss at 1 year after DMEK. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7338484 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73384842020-07-09 Risk factors for endothelial cell loss after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) Hayashi, Takahiko Schrittenlocher, Silvia Siebelmann, Sebastian Le, Viet Nhat Hung Matthaei, Mario Franklin, Jeremy Bachmann, Björn Cursiefen, Claus Sci Rep Article This study aimed to identify the risk factors for endothelial cell density (ECD) loss after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) and analyse whether donor tissues from cold versus organ culture differ in terms of ECD loss after DMEK. Consecutive DMEK cases from a prospective database for Fuchs’ endothelial corneal dystrophy were retrospectively analysed between 2011 and 2016 at the University of Cologne, and the possible risk factors for ECD loss, including patient-related factors, type of tamponade (air or 20% sulphur hexafluoride gas), type of surgery (triple DMEK or DMEK alone), re-bubbling, immune rejection, and donor-related factors were determined. Eight hundred and forty-one eyes were selected. There was no significant difference in the best-corrected visual acuity (logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution) and corneal thickness (P = 0.540 and P = 0.667) between groups. Immune reactions were more common in cold cultures (P = 0.019), but ECD loss (1 year after DMEK) was greater in organ cultures (38.3 ± 0.8%) than in cold cultures (34.7 ± 1.4%) (P = 0.022). Only re-bubbling was significantly associated with ECD loss (P < 0.001). Re-bubbling was found to be a key factor for ECD loss at 1 year after DMEK. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7338484/ /pubmed/32632151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68023-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Hayashi, Takahiko Schrittenlocher, Silvia Siebelmann, Sebastian Le, Viet Nhat Hung Matthaei, Mario Franklin, Jeremy Bachmann, Björn Cursiefen, Claus Risk factors for endothelial cell loss after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) |
title | Risk factors for endothelial cell loss after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) |
title_full | Risk factors for endothelial cell loss after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) |
title_fullStr | Risk factors for endothelial cell loss after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) |
title_full_unstemmed | Risk factors for endothelial cell loss after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) |
title_short | Risk factors for endothelial cell loss after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) |
title_sort | risk factors for endothelial cell loss after descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (dmek) |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7338484/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32632151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-68023-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hayashitakahiko riskfactorsforendothelialcelllossafterdescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplastydmek AT schrittenlochersilvia riskfactorsforendothelialcelllossafterdescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplastydmek AT siebelmannsebastian riskfactorsforendothelialcelllossafterdescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplastydmek AT levietnhathung riskfactorsforendothelialcelllossafterdescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplastydmek AT matthaeimario riskfactorsforendothelialcelllossafterdescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplastydmek AT franklinjeremy riskfactorsforendothelialcelllossafterdescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplastydmek AT bachmannbjorn riskfactorsforendothelialcelllossafterdescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplastydmek AT cursiefenclaus riskfactorsforendothelialcelllossafterdescemetmembraneendothelialkeratoplastydmek |