Cargando…
Unspoken Assumptions in Multi-layer Modularity maximization
A principled approach to recover communities in social networks is to find a clustering of the network nodes into modules (i.e groups of nodes) for which the modularity over the network is maximal. This guarantees partitioning the network nodes into sparsely connected groups of densely connected nod...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7338500/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32632217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66956-0 |
_version_ | 1783554692067885056 |
---|---|
author | Hanteer, Obaida Magnani, Matteo |
author_facet | Hanteer, Obaida Magnani, Matteo |
author_sort | Hanteer, Obaida |
collection | PubMed |
description | A principled approach to recover communities in social networks is to find a clustering of the network nodes into modules (i.e groups of nodes) for which the modularity over the network is maximal. This guarantees partitioning the network nodes into sparsely connected groups of densely connected nodes. A popular extension of modularity has been proposed in the literature so it applies to multi-layer networks, that is, networks that model different types/aspects of interactions among a set of actors. In this extension, a new parameter, the coupling strength ω, has been introduced to couple different copies (i.e nodes) of the same actor with specific weights across different layers. This allows two nodes that refer to the same actor to reward the modularity score with an amount proportional to ω when they appear in the same community. While this extension seems to provide an effective tool to detect communities in multi-layer networks, it is not always clear what kind of communities maximising the generalised modularity can identify in multi-layer networks and whether these communities are inclusive to all possible community structures possible to exist in multi-layer networks. In addition, it has not been thoroughly investigated yet how to interpret ω in real-world scenarios, and whether a proper tuning of ω, if exists, is enough to guarantee an accurate recoverability for different types of multi-layer community structures. In this article, we report the different ways used in the literature to tune ω. We analyse different community structures that can be recovered by maximising the generalised modularity in relation to ω. We propose different models for multi-layer communities in multiplex and time-dependent networks and test if they are recoverable by modularity-maximization community detection methods under any assignment of ω. Our main finding is that only few simple models of multi-layer communities in multiplex and time-dependent networks are recoverable by modularity maximisation methods while more complex models are not accurately recoverable under any assignment of ω. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7338500 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73385002020-07-09 Unspoken Assumptions in Multi-layer Modularity maximization Hanteer, Obaida Magnani, Matteo Sci Rep Article A principled approach to recover communities in social networks is to find a clustering of the network nodes into modules (i.e groups of nodes) for which the modularity over the network is maximal. This guarantees partitioning the network nodes into sparsely connected groups of densely connected nodes. A popular extension of modularity has been proposed in the literature so it applies to multi-layer networks, that is, networks that model different types/aspects of interactions among a set of actors. In this extension, a new parameter, the coupling strength ω, has been introduced to couple different copies (i.e nodes) of the same actor with specific weights across different layers. This allows two nodes that refer to the same actor to reward the modularity score with an amount proportional to ω when they appear in the same community. While this extension seems to provide an effective tool to detect communities in multi-layer networks, it is not always clear what kind of communities maximising the generalised modularity can identify in multi-layer networks and whether these communities are inclusive to all possible community structures possible to exist in multi-layer networks. In addition, it has not been thoroughly investigated yet how to interpret ω in real-world scenarios, and whether a proper tuning of ω, if exists, is enough to guarantee an accurate recoverability for different types of multi-layer community structures. In this article, we report the different ways used in the literature to tune ω. We analyse different community structures that can be recovered by maximising the generalised modularity in relation to ω. We propose different models for multi-layer communities in multiplex and time-dependent networks and test if they are recoverable by modularity-maximization community detection methods under any assignment of ω. Our main finding is that only few simple models of multi-layer communities in multiplex and time-dependent networks are recoverable by modularity maximisation methods while more complex models are not accurately recoverable under any assignment of ω. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7338500/ /pubmed/32632217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66956-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Hanteer, Obaida Magnani, Matteo Unspoken Assumptions in Multi-layer Modularity maximization |
title | Unspoken Assumptions in Multi-layer Modularity maximization |
title_full | Unspoken Assumptions in Multi-layer Modularity maximization |
title_fullStr | Unspoken Assumptions in Multi-layer Modularity maximization |
title_full_unstemmed | Unspoken Assumptions in Multi-layer Modularity maximization |
title_short | Unspoken Assumptions in Multi-layer Modularity maximization |
title_sort | unspoken assumptions in multi-layer modularity maximization |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7338500/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32632217 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-66956-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hanteerobaida unspokenassumptionsinmultilayermodularitymaximization AT magnanimatteo unspokenassumptionsinmultilayermodularitymaximization |