Cargando…

Four-dot masking in monoptic and dichoptic viewing

In visual backward masking paradigms, the visibility of a target is reduced using various kinds of mask stimuli presented immediately after the target. Four-dot masking is one such kind of backward masking, caused by four surrounding dots neither spatially adjacent nor similar to the target. Four-do...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakamura, Tomoya, Lavrenteva, Sofia, Murakami, Ikuya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7338523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32632121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67922-6
_version_ 1783554697257287680
author Nakamura, Tomoya
Lavrenteva, Sofia
Murakami, Ikuya
author_facet Nakamura, Tomoya
Lavrenteva, Sofia
Murakami, Ikuya
author_sort Nakamura, Tomoya
collection PubMed
description In visual backward masking paradigms, the visibility of a target is reduced using various kinds of mask stimuli presented immediately after the target. Four-dot masking is one such kind of backward masking, caused by four surrounding dots neither spatially adjacent nor similar to the target. Four-dot masking is often considered to involve object-level interferences. However, low-level contributions such as lateral inhibition and motion detection are also possible. To elucidate the loci of the underlying mechanism within the visual hierarchy, we compared the masking effect between monoptic and dichoptic viewing conditions. A target and a four-dot mask, which also served as a spatial cue to the target location, were presented to the same eye in monoptic viewing, whereas they were presented to different eyes in dichoptic viewing. Observers were then asked to discriminate the target shape. We found a significant decline in the correct response rate compared to the baseline condition in which the four-dot mask was not presented, and the masking effect was equivalent between the monoptic and dichoptic viewings. These results demonstrate that four-dot masking stems exclusively from processing within the binocular pathway.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7338523
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73385232020-07-09 Four-dot masking in monoptic and dichoptic viewing Nakamura, Tomoya Lavrenteva, Sofia Murakami, Ikuya Sci Rep Article In visual backward masking paradigms, the visibility of a target is reduced using various kinds of mask stimuli presented immediately after the target. Four-dot masking is one such kind of backward masking, caused by four surrounding dots neither spatially adjacent nor similar to the target. Four-dot masking is often considered to involve object-level interferences. However, low-level contributions such as lateral inhibition and motion detection are also possible. To elucidate the loci of the underlying mechanism within the visual hierarchy, we compared the masking effect between monoptic and dichoptic viewing conditions. A target and a four-dot mask, which also served as a spatial cue to the target location, were presented to the same eye in monoptic viewing, whereas they were presented to different eyes in dichoptic viewing. Observers were then asked to discriminate the target shape. We found a significant decline in the correct response rate compared to the baseline condition in which the four-dot mask was not presented, and the masking effect was equivalent between the monoptic and dichoptic viewings. These results demonstrate that four-dot masking stems exclusively from processing within the binocular pathway. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7338523/ /pubmed/32632121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67922-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Nakamura, Tomoya
Lavrenteva, Sofia
Murakami, Ikuya
Four-dot masking in monoptic and dichoptic viewing
title Four-dot masking in monoptic and dichoptic viewing
title_full Four-dot masking in monoptic and dichoptic viewing
title_fullStr Four-dot masking in monoptic and dichoptic viewing
title_full_unstemmed Four-dot masking in monoptic and dichoptic viewing
title_short Four-dot masking in monoptic and dichoptic viewing
title_sort four-dot masking in monoptic and dichoptic viewing
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7338523/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32632121
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67922-6
work_keys_str_mv AT nakamuratomoya fourdotmaskinginmonopticanddichopticviewing
AT lavrentevasofia fourdotmaskinginmonopticanddichopticviewing
AT murakamiikuya fourdotmaskinginmonopticanddichopticviewing