Cargando…
Four-dot masking in monoptic and dichoptic viewing
In visual backward masking paradigms, the visibility of a target is reduced using various kinds of mask stimuli presented immediately after the target. Four-dot masking is one such kind of backward masking, caused by four surrounding dots neither spatially adjacent nor similar to the target. Four-do...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7338523/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32632121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67922-6 |
_version_ | 1783554697257287680 |
---|---|
author | Nakamura, Tomoya Lavrenteva, Sofia Murakami, Ikuya |
author_facet | Nakamura, Tomoya Lavrenteva, Sofia Murakami, Ikuya |
author_sort | Nakamura, Tomoya |
collection | PubMed |
description | In visual backward masking paradigms, the visibility of a target is reduced using various kinds of mask stimuli presented immediately after the target. Four-dot masking is one such kind of backward masking, caused by four surrounding dots neither spatially adjacent nor similar to the target. Four-dot masking is often considered to involve object-level interferences. However, low-level contributions such as lateral inhibition and motion detection are also possible. To elucidate the loci of the underlying mechanism within the visual hierarchy, we compared the masking effect between monoptic and dichoptic viewing conditions. A target and a four-dot mask, which also served as a spatial cue to the target location, were presented to the same eye in monoptic viewing, whereas they were presented to different eyes in dichoptic viewing. Observers were then asked to discriminate the target shape. We found a significant decline in the correct response rate compared to the baseline condition in which the four-dot mask was not presented, and the masking effect was equivalent between the monoptic and dichoptic viewings. These results demonstrate that four-dot masking stems exclusively from processing within the binocular pathway. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7338523 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73385232020-07-09 Four-dot masking in monoptic and dichoptic viewing Nakamura, Tomoya Lavrenteva, Sofia Murakami, Ikuya Sci Rep Article In visual backward masking paradigms, the visibility of a target is reduced using various kinds of mask stimuli presented immediately after the target. Four-dot masking is one such kind of backward masking, caused by four surrounding dots neither spatially adjacent nor similar to the target. Four-dot masking is often considered to involve object-level interferences. However, low-level contributions such as lateral inhibition and motion detection are also possible. To elucidate the loci of the underlying mechanism within the visual hierarchy, we compared the masking effect between monoptic and dichoptic viewing conditions. A target and a four-dot mask, which also served as a spatial cue to the target location, were presented to the same eye in monoptic viewing, whereas they were presented to different eyes in dichoptic viewing. Observers were then asked to discriminate the target shape. We found a significant decline in the correct response rate compared to the baseline condition in which the four-dot mask was not presented, and the masking effect was equivalent between the monoptic and dichoptic viewings. These results demonstrate that four-dot masking stems exclusively from processing within the binocular pathway. Nature Publishing Group UK 2020-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7338523/ /pubmed/32632121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67922-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Nakamura, Tomoya Lavrenteva, Sofia Murakami, Ikuya Four-dot masking in monoptic and dichoptic viewing |
title | Four-dot masking in monoptic and dichoptic viewing |
title_full | Four-dot masking in monoptic and dichoptic viewing |
title_fullStr | Four-dot masking in monoptic and dichoptic viewing |
title_full_unstemmed | Four-dot masking in monoptic and dichoptic viewing |
title_short | Four-dot masking in monoptic and dichoptic viewing |
title_sort | four-dot masking in monoptic and dichoptic viewing |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7338523/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32632121 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-67922-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nakamuratomoya fourdotmaskinginmonopticanddichopticviewing AT lavrentevasofia fourdotmaskinginmonopticanddichopticviewing AT murakamiikuya fourdotmaskinginmonopticanddichopticviewing |