Cargando…

T-Cell Dependent Immunogenicity of Protein Therapeutics Pre-clinical Assessment and Mitigation–Updated Consensus and Review 2020

Immune responses to protein and peptide drugs can alter or reduce their efficacy and may be associated with adverse effects. While anti-drug antibodies (ADA) are a standard clinical measure of protein therapeutic immunogenicity, T cell epitopes in the primary sequences of these drugs are the key dri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jawa, Vibha, Terry, Frances, Gokemeijer, Jochem, Mitra-Kaushik, Shibani, Roberts, Brian J., Tourdot, Sophie, De Groot, Anne S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7338774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32695107
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.01301
_version_ 1783554756653875200
author Jawa, Vibha
Terry, Frances
Gokemeijer, Jochem
Mitra-Kaushik, Shibani
Roberts, Brian J.
Tourdot, Sophie
De Groot, Anne S.
author_facet Jawa, Vibha
Terry, Frances
Gokemeijer, Jochem
Mitra-Kaushik, Shibani
Roberts, Brian J.
Tourdot, Sophie
De Groot, Anne S.
author_sort Jawa, Vibha
collection PubMed
description Immune responses to protein and peptide drugs can alter or reduce their efficacy and may be associated with adverse effects. While anti-drug antibodies (ADA) are a standard clinical measure of protein therapeutic immunogenicity, T cell epitopes in the primary sequences of these drugs are the key drivers or modulators of ADA response, depending on the type of T cell response that is stimulated (e.g., T helper or Regulatory T cells, respectively). In a previous publication on T cell-dependent immunogenicity of biotherapeutics, we addressed mitigation efforts such as identifying and reducing the presence of T cell epitopes or T cell response to protein therapeutics prior to further development of the protein therapeutic for clinical use. Over the past 5 years, greater insight into the role of regulatory T cell epitopes and the conservation of T cell epitopes with self (beyond germline) has improved the preclinical assessment of immunogenic potential. In addition, impurities contained in therapeutic drug formulations such as host cell proteins have also attracted attention and become the focus of novel risk assessment methods. Target effects have come into focus, given the emergence of protein and peptide drugs that target immune receptors in immuno-oncology applications. Lastly, new modalities are entering the clinic, leading to the need to revise certain aspects of the preclinical immunogenicity assessment pathway. In addition to drugs that have multiple antibody-derived domains or non-antibody scaffolds, therapeutic drugs may now be introduced via viral vectors, cell-based constructs, or nucleic acid based therapeutics that may, in addition to delivering drug, also prime the immune system, driving immune response to the delivery vehicle as well as the encoded therapeutic, adding to the complexity of assessing immunogenicity risk. While it is challenging to keep pace with emerging methods for the preclinical assessment of protein therapeutics and new biologic therapeutic modalities, this collective compendium provides a guide to current best practices and new concepts in the field.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7338774
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73387742020-07-20 T-Cell Dependent Immunogenicity of Protein Therapeutics Pre-clinical Assessment and Mitigation–Updated Consensus and Review 2020 Jawa, Vibha Terry, Frances Gokemeijer, Jochem Mitra-Kaushik, Shibani Roberts, Brian J. Tourdot, Sophie De Groot, Anne S. Front Immunol Immunology Immune responses to protein and peptide drugs can alter or reduce their efficacy and may be associated with adverse effects. While anti-drug antibodies (ADA) are a standard clinical measure of protein therapeutic immunogenicity, T cell epitopes in the primary sequences of these drugs are the key drivers or modulators of ADA response, depending on the type of T cell response that is stimulated (e.g., T helper or Regulatory T cells, respectively). In a previous publication on T cell-dependent immunogenicity of biotherapeutics, we addressed mitigation efforts such as identifying and reducing the presence of T cell epitopes or T cell response to protein therapeutics prior to further development of the protein therapeutic for clinical use. Over the past 5 years, greater insight into the role of regulatory T cell epitopes and the conservation of T cell epitopes with self (beyond germline) has improved the preclinical assessment of immunogenic potential. In addition, impurities contained in therapeutic drug formulations such as host cell proteins have also attracted attention and become the focus of novel risk assessment methods. Target effects have come into focus, given the emergence of protein and peptide drugs that target immune receptors in immuno-oncology applications. Lastly, new modalities are entering the clinic, leading to the need to revise certain aspects of the preclinical immunogenicity assessment pathway. In addition to drugs that have multiple antibody-derived domains or non-antibody scaffolds, therapeutic drugs may now be introduced via viral vectors, cell-based constructs, or nucleic acid based therapeutics that may, in addition to delivering drug, also prime the immune system, driving immune response to the delivery vehicle as well as the encoded therapeutic, adding to the complexity of assessing immunogenicity risk. While it is challenging to keep pace with emerging methods for the preclinical assessment of protein therapeutics and new biologic therapeutic modalities, this collective compendium provides a guide to current best practices and new concepts in the field. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-06-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7338774/ /pubmed/32695107 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.01301 Text en Copyright © 2020 Jawa, Terry, Gokemeijer, Mitra-Kaushik, Roberts, Tourdot and De Groot. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Immunology
Jawa, Vibha
Terry, Frances
Gokemeijer, Jochem
Mitra-Kaushik, Shibani
Roberts, Brian J.
Tourdot, Sophie
De Groot, Anne S.
T-Cell Dependent Immunogenicity of Protein Therapeutics Pre-clinical Assessment and Mitigation–Updated Consensus and Review 2020
title T-Cell Dependent Immunogenicity of Protein Therapeutics Pre-clinical Assessment and Mitigation–Updated Consensus and Review 2020
title_full T-Cell Dependent Immunogenicity of Protein Therapeutics Pre-clinical Assessment and Mitigation–Updated Consensus and Review 2020
title_fullStr T-Cell Dependent Immunogenicity of Protein Therapeutics Pre-clinical Assessment and Mitigation–Updated Consensus and Review 2020
title_full_unstemmed T-Cell Dependent Immunogenicity of Protein Therapeutics Pre-clinical Assessment and Mitigation–Updated Consensus and Review 2020
title_short T-Cell Dependent Immunogenicity of Protein Therapeutics Pre-clinical Assessment and Mitigation–Updated Consensus and Review 2020
title_sort t-cell dependent immunogenicity of protein therapeutics pre-clinical assessment and mitigation–updated consensus and review 2020
topic Immunology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7338774/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32695107
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2020.01301
work_keys_str_mv AT jawavibha tcelldependentimmunogenicityofproteintherapeuticspreclinicalassessmentandmitigationupdatedconsensusandreview2020
AT terryfrances tcelldependentimmunogenicityofproteintherapeuticspreclinicalassessmentandmitigationupdatedconsensusandreview2020
AT gokemeijerjochem tcelldependentimmunogenicityofproteintherapeuticspreclinicalassessmentandmitigationupdatedconsensusandreview2020
AT mitrakaushikshibani tcelldependentimmunogenicityofproteintherapeuticspreclinicalassessmentandmitigationupdatedconsensusandreview2020
AT robertsbrianj tcelldependentimmunogenicityofproteintherapeuticspreclinicalassessmentandmitigationupdatedconsensusandreview2020
AT tourdotsophie tcelldependentimmunogenicityofproteintherapeuticspreclinicalassessmentandmitigationupdatedconsensusandreview2020
AT degrootannes tcelldependentimmunogenicityofproteintherapeuticspreclinicalassessmentandmitigationupdatedconsensusandreview2020