Cargando…
A Rational Approach to Understanding and Evaluating Responsive Neurostimulation
Closed-loop brain stimulation is increasingly used in level 4 epilepsy centers without an understanding of how the device behaves on a daily basis. This lack of insight is a barrier to improving closed-loop therapy and ultimately understanding why some patients never achieve seizure reduction. We ai...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7338816/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31919656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12021-019-09446-7 |
_version_ | 1783554766101544960 |
---|---|
author | Sisterson, Nathaniel D. Wozny, Thomas A. Kokkinos, Vasileios Bagic, Anto Urban, Alexandra P. Richardson, R. Mark |
author_facet | Sisterson, Nathaniel D. Wozny, Thomas A. Kokkinos, Vasileios Bagic, Anto Urban, Alexandra P. Richardson, R. Mark |
author_sort | Sisterson, Nathaniel D. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Closed-loop brain stimulation is increasingly used in level 4 epilepsy centers without an understanding of how the device behaves on a daily basis. This lack of insight is a barrier to improving closed-loop therapy and ultimately understanding why some patients never achieve seizure reduction. We aimed to quantify the accuracy of closed-loop seizure detection and stimulation on the RNS device through extrapolating information derived from manually reviewed ECoG recordings and comprehensive device logging information. RNS System event logging data were obtained, reviewed, and analyzed using a custom-built software package. A weighted-means methodology was developed to adjust for bias and incompleteness in event logs and evaluated using Bland–Altman plots and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests to compare adjusted and non-weighted (standard method) results. Twelve patients implanted for a mean of 21.5 (interquartile range 13.5–31) months were reviewed. The mean seizure frequency reduction post-RNS implantation was 40.1% (interquartile range 0–96.2%). Three primary levels of event logging granularity were identified (ECoG recordings: 3.0% complete (interquartile range 0.3–1.8%); Event Lists: 72.9% complete (interquartile range 44.7–99.8%); Activity Logs: 100% complete; completeness measured with respect to Activity Logs). Bland–Altman interpretation confirmed non-equivalence with unpredictable differences in both magnitude and direction. Wilcoxon signed rank tests demonstrated significant (p < 10(−6)) differences in accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity at >5% absolute mean difference for extrapolated versus standard results. Device behavior logged by the RNS System should be used in conjunction with careful review of stored ECoG data to extrapolate metrics for detector performance and stimulation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12021-019-09446-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7338816 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73388162020-07-09 A Rational Approach to Understanding and Evaluating Responsive Neurostimulation Sisterson, Nathaniel D. Wozny, Thomas A. Kokkinos, Vasileios Bagic, Anto Urban, Alexandra P. Richardson, R. Mark Neuroinformatics Original Article Closed-loop brain stimulation is increasingly used in level 4 epilepsy centers without an understanding of how the device behaves on a daily basis. This lack of insight is a barrier to improving closed-loop therapy and ultimately understanding why some patients never achieve seizure reduction. We aimed to quantify the accuracy of closed-loop seizure detection and stimulation on the RNS device through extrapolating information derived from manually reviewed ECoG recordings and comprehensive device logging information. RNS System event logging data were obtained, reviewed, and analyzed using a custom-built software package. A weighted-means methodology was developed to adjust for bias and incompleteness in event logs and evaluated using Bland–Altman plots and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests to compare adjusted and non-weighted (standard method) results. Twelve patients implanted for a mean of 21.5 (interquartile range 13.5–31) months were reviewed. The mean seizure frequency reduction post-RNS implantation was 40.1% (interquartile range 0–96.2%). Three primary levels of event logging granularity were identified (ECoG recordings: 3.0% complete (interquartile range 0.3–1.8%); Event Lists: 72.9% complete (interquartile range 44.7–99.8%); Activity Logs: 100% complete; completeness measured with respect to Activity Logs). Bland–Altman interpretation confirmed non-equivalence with unpredictable differences in both magnitude and direction. Wilcoxon signed rank tests demonstrated significant (p < 10(−6)) differences in accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity at >5% absolute mean difference for extrapolated versus standard results. Device behavior logged by the RNS System should be used in conjunction with careful review of stored ECoG data to extrapolate metrics for detector performance and stimulation. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s12021-019-09446-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-01-09 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7338816/ /pubmed/31919656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12021-019-09446-7 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Sisterson, Nathaniel D. Wozny, Thomas A. Kokkinos, Vasileios Bagic, Anto Urban, Alexandra P. Richardson, R. Mark A Rational Approach to Understanding and Evaluating Responsive Neurostimulation |
title | A Rational Approach to Understanding and Evaluating Responsive Neurostimulation |
title_full | A Rational Approach to Understanding and Evaluating Responsive Neurostimulation |
title_fullStr | A Rational Approach to Understanding and Evaluating Responsive Neurostimulation |
title_full_unstemmed | A Rational Approach to Understanding and Evaluating Responsive Neurostimulation |
title_short | A Rational Approach to Understanding and Evaluating Responsive Neurostimulation |
title_sort | rational approach to understanding and evaluating responsive neurostimulation |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7338816/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31919656 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12021-019-09446-7 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sistersonnathanield arationalapproachtounderstandingandevaluatingresponsiveneurostimulation AT woznythomasa arationalapproachtounderstandingandevaluatingresponsiveneurostimulation AT kokkinosvasileios arationalapproachtounderstandingandevaluatingresponsiveneurostimulation AT bagicanto arationalapproachtounderstandingandevaluatingresponsiveneurostimulation AT urbanalexandrap arationalapproachtounderstandingandevaluatingresponsiveneurostimulation AT richardsonrmark arationalapproachtounderstandingandevaluatingresponsiveneurostimulation AT sistersonnathanield rationalapproachtounderstandingandevaluatingresponsiveneurostimulation AT woznythomasa rationalapproachtounderstandingandevaluatingresponsiveneurostimulation AT kokkinosvasileios rationalapproachtounderstandingandevaluatingresponsiveneurostimulation AT bagicanto rationalapproachtounderstandingandevaluatingresponsiveneurostimulation AT urbanalexandrap rationalapproachtounderstandingandevaluatingresponsiveneurostimulation AT richardsonrmark rationalapproachtounderstandingandevaluatingresponsiveneurostimulation |