Cargando…
Evaluation of Xpert MTB/RIF for the Diagnosis of Lymphatic Tuberculosis
BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization approved the use of Xpert MTB/RIF for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA, which has significantly improved the diagnosis of tuberculosis. In this study, our main objective was to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of Xpert MTB/RIF for lymphoid tub...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7338981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32685449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/1968487 |
_version_ | 1783554799135883264 |
---|---|
author | Li, Hou-He He, Zhi-Jian Liang, Jia-Qi Li, Gui-Lin Xie, Tian-Ao Liu, Ye-Ling Li, Zhong-Wei Feng, Xuan-Cheng Xia, Yong Guo, Xu-Guang |
author_facet | Li, Hou-He He, Zhi-Jian Liang, Jia-Qi Li, Gui-Lin Xie, Tian-Ao Liu, Ye-Ling Li, Zhong-Wei Feng, Xuan-Cheng Xia, Yong Guo, Xu-Guang |
author_sort | Li, Hou-He |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization approved the use of Xpert MTB/RIF for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA, which has significantly improved the diagnosis of tuberculosis. In this study, our main objective was to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of Xpert MTB/RIF for lymphoid tuberculosis to determine whether Xpert MTB/RIF could be used as a routine detection method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched four databases for the relevant literature published from May 2007 to December 2019. The quality of the literature was evaluated with reference to the evaluation criteria. Data that were extracted from the literature on Xpert MTB/RIF diagnosis of lymphatic tuberculosis were used to plot the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve, after which the software was used to combine and analyze the accuracy of these data. RESULTS: A total of 27 studies were included. The sensitivity of Xpert MTB/RIF for detecting lymphatic tuberculosis was 0.79 (95% CI (0.77, 0.81)), the specificity was 0.88 (95% CI (0.87, 0.90)), and the positive likelihood ratio (PLR) was 7.21 (95% CI (4.93, 10.55)). In addition, the negative likelihood ratio (NLR) was 0.25 (95% CI (0.19, 0.32)) and the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 40.23 (95% CI (24.53, 65.98)). At the same time, we used the extracted data to make the SROC curve, obtaining the following parameters: area under the curve (AUC) = 0.9144, Q = 0.8470 (SE = 0.0163). CONCLUSION: Xpert MTB/RIF has high accuracy in detecting lymphatic tuberculosis, and it can be used to quickly and easily diagnose lymphatic tuberculosis at an early stage as a general method. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7338981 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73389812020-07-17 Evaluation of Xpert MTB/RIF for the Diagnosis of Lymphatic Tuberculosis Li, Hou-He He, Zhi-Jian Liang, Jia-Qi Li, Gui-Lin Xie, Tian-Ao Liu, Ye-Ling Li, Zhong-Wei Feng, Xuan-Cheng Xia, Yong Guo, Xu-Guang Biomed Res Int Research Article BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization approved the use of Xpert MTB/RIF for the detection of Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA, which has significantly improved the diagnosis of tuberculosis. In this study, our main objective was to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of Xpert MTB/RIF for lymphoid tuberculosis to determine whether Xpert MTB/RIF could be used as a routine detection method. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched four databases for the relevant literature published from May 2007 to December 2019. The quality of the literature was evaluated with reference to the evaluation criteria. Data that were extracted from the literature on Xpert MTB/RIF diagnosis of lymphatic tuberculosis were used to plot the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve, after which the software was used to combine and analyze the accuracy of these data. RESULTS: A total of 27 studies were included. The sensitivity of Xpert MTB/RIF for detecting lymphatic tuberculosis was 0.79 (95% CI (0.77, 0.81)), the specificity was 0.88 (95% CI (0.87, 0.90)), and the positive likelihood ratio (PLR) was 7.21 (95% CI (4.93, 10.55)). In addition, the negative likelihood ratio (NLR) was 0.25 (95% CI (0.19, 0.32)) and the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) was 40.23 (95% CI (24.53, 65.98)). At the same time, we used the extracted data to make the SROC curve, obtaining the following parameters: area under the curve (AUC) = 0.9144, Q = 0.8470 (SE = 0.0163). CONCLUSION: Xpert MTB/RIF has high accuracy in detecting lymphatic tuberculosis, and it can be used to quickly and easily diagnose lymphatic tuberculosis at an early stage as a general method. Hindawi 2020-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7338981/ /pubmed/32685449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/1968487 Text en Copyright © 2020 Hou-He Li et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Li, Hou-He He, Zhi-Jian Liang, Jia-Qi Li, Gui-Lin Xie, Tian-Ao Liu, Ye-Ling Li, Zhong-Wei Feng, Xuan-Cheng Xia, Yong Guo, Xu-Guang Evaluation of Xpert MTB/RIF for the Diagnosis of Lymphatic Tuberculosis |
title | Evaluation of Xpert MTB/RIF for the Diagnosis of Lymphatic Tuberculosis |
title_full | Evaluation of Xpert MTB/RIF for the Diagnosis of Lymphatic Tuberculosis |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Xpert MTB/RIF for the Diagnosis of Lymphatic Tuberculosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Xpert MTB/RIF for the Diagnosis of Lymphatic Tuberculosis |
title_short | Evaluation of Xpert MTB/RIF for the Diagnosis of Lymphatic Tuberculosis |
title_sort | evaluation of xpert mtb/rif for the diagnosis of lymphatic tuberculosis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7338981/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32685449 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/1968487 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lihouhe evaluationofxpertmtbrifforthediagnosisoflymphatictuberculosis AT hezhijian evaluationofxpertmtbrifforthediagnosisoflymphatictuberculosis AT liangjiaqi evaluationofxpertmtbrifforthediagnosisoflymphatictuberculosis AT liguilin evaluationofxpertmtbrifforthediagnosisoflymphatictuberculosis AT xietianao evaluationofxpertmtbrifforthediagnosisoflymphatictuberculosis AT liuyeling evaluationofxpertmtbrifforthediagnosisoflymphatictuberculosis AT lizhongwei evaluationofxpertmtbrifforthediagnosisoflymphatictuberculosis AT fengxuancheng evaluationofxpertmtbrifforthediagnosisoflymphatictuberculosis AT xiayong evaluationofxpertmtbrifforthediagnosisoflymphatictuberculosis AT guoxuguang evaluationofxpertmtbrifforthediagnosisoflymphatictuberculosis |