Cargando…

Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance clodinafop (variant evaluated clodinafop‐propargyl)

The conclusions of the EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, Greece, and co‐rapporteur Member State, Germany, for the pesticide active substance clodinafop‐propargyl are reported. The context of the pee...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anastassiadou, Maria, Arena, Maria, Auteri, Domenica, Brancato, Alba, Bura, Laszlo, Carrasco Cabrera, Luis, Chaideftou, Eugenia, Chiusolo, Arianna, Court Marques, Danièle, Crivellente, Federica, De Lentdecker, Chloe, Egsmose, Mark, Fait, Gabriella, Greco, Luna, Ippolito, Alessio, Istace, Frederique, Jarrah, Samira, Kardassi, Dimitra, Leuschner, Renata, Lostia, Alfonso, Lythgo, Christopher, Magrans, Oriol, Mangas, Iris, Miron, Ileana, Molnar, Tunde, Padovani, Laura, Parra Morte, Juan Manuel, Pedersen, Ragnor, Reich, Hermine, Santos, Miguel, Serafimova, Rositsa, Sharp, Rachel, Stanek, Alois, Sturma, Juergen, Szentes, Csaba, Terron, Andrea, Tiramani, Manuela, Vagenende, Benedicte, Villamar‐Bouza, Laura
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7339173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32665791
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6151
_version_ 1783554836311048192
author Anastassiadou, Maria
Arena, Maria
Auteri, Domenica
Brancato, Alba
Bura, Laszlo
Carrasco Cabrera, Luis
Chaideftou, Eugenia
Chiusolo, Arianna
Court Marques, Danièle
Crivellente, Federica
De Lentdecker, Chloe
Egsmose, Mark
Fait, Gabriella
Greco, Luna
Ippolito, Alessio
Istace, Frederique
Jarrah, Samira
Kardassi, Dimitra
Leuschner, Renata
Lostia, Alfonso
Lythgo, Christopher
Magrans, Oriol
Mangas, Iris
Miron, Ileana
Molnar, Tunde
Padovani, Laura
Parra Morte, Juan Manuel
Pedersen, Ragnor
Reich, Hermine
Santos, Miguel
Serafimova, Rositsa
Sharp, Rachel
Stanek, Alois
Sturma, Juergen
Szentes, Csaba
Terron, Andrea
Tiramani, Manuela
Vagenende, Benedicte
Villamar‐Bouza, Laura
author_facet Anastassiadou, Maria
Arena, Maria
Auteri, Domenica
Brancato, Alba
Bura, Laszlo
Carrasco Cabrera, Luis
Chaideftou, Eugenia
Chiusolo, Arianna
Court Marques, Danièle
Crivellente, Federica
De Lentdecker, Chloe
Egsmose, Mark
Fait, Gabriella
Greco, Luna
Ippolito, Alessio
Istace, Frederique
Jarrah, Samira
Kardassi, Dimitra
Leuschner, Renata
Lostia, Alfonso
Lythgo, Christopher
Magrans, Oriol
Mangas, Iris
Miron, Ileana
Molnar, Tunde
Padovani, Laura
Parra Morte, Juan Manuel
Pedersen, Ragnor
Reich, Hermine
Santos, Miguel
Serafimova, Rositsa
Sharp, Rachel
Stanek, Alois
Sturma, Juergen
Szentes, Csaba
Terron, Andrea
Tiramani, Manuela
Vagenende, Benedicte
Villamar‐Bouza, Laura
collection PubMed
description The conclusions of the EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, Greece, and co‐rapporteur Member State, Germany, for the pesticide active substance clodinafop‐propargyl are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of clodinafop‐propargyl as a herbicide on wheat, rye and triticale. The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified. The European Commission mandated EFSA to reconsider the acceptable operator exposure level (AOEL) setting and to update the non‐dietary exposure assessment if needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7339173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73391732020-07-13 Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance clodinafop (variant evaluated clodinafop‐propargyl) Anastassiadou, Maria Arena, Maria Auteri, Domenica Brancato, Alba Bura, Laszlo Carrasco Cabrera, Luis Chaideftou, Eugenia Chiusolo, Arianna Court Marques, Danièle Crivellente, Federica De Lentdecker, Chloe Egsmose, Mark Fait, Gabriella Greco, Luna Ippolito, Alessio Istace, Frederique Jarrah, Samira Kardassi, Dimitra Leuschner, Renata Lostia, Alfonso Lythgo, Christopher Magrans, Oriol Mangas, Iris Miron, Ileana Molnar, Tunde Padovani, Laura Parra Morte, Juan Manuel Pedersen, Ragnor Reich, Hermine Santos, Miguel Serafimova, Rositsa Sharp, Rachel Stanek, Alois Sturma, Juergen Szentes, Csaba Terron, Andrea Tiramani, Manuela Vagenende, Benedicte Villamar‐Bouza, Laura EFSA J Conclusion on Pesticides Peer Review The conclusions of the EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, Greece, and co‐rapporteur Member State, Germany, for the pesticide active substance clodinafop‐propargyl are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of clodinafop‐propargyl as a herbicide on wheat, rye and triticale. The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified. The European Commission mandated EFSA to reconsider the acceptable operator exposure level (AOEL) setting and to update the non‐dietary exposure assessment if needed. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7339173/ /pubmed/32665791 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6151 Text en © 2020 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Conclusion on Pesticides Peer Review
Anastassiadou, Maria
Arena, Maria
Auteri, Domenica
Brancato, Alba
Bura, Laszlo
Carrasco Cabrera, Luis
Chaideftou, Eugenia
Chiusolo, Arianna
Court Marques, Danièle
Crivellente, Federica
De Lentdecker, Chloe
Egsmose, Mark
Fait, Gabriella
Greco, Luna
Ippolito, Alessio
Istace, Frederique
Jarrah, Samira
Kardassi, Dimitra
Leuschner, Renata
Lostia, Alfonso
Lythgo, Christopher
Magrans, Oriol
Mangas, Iris
Miron, Ileana
Molnar, Tunde
Padovani, Laura
Parra Morte, Juan Manuel
Pedersen, Ragnor
Reich, Hermine
Santos, Miguel
Serafimova, Rositsa
Sharp, Rachel
Stanek, Alois
Sturma, Juergen
Szentes, Csaba
Terron, Andrea
Tiramani, Manuela
Vagenende, Benedicte
Villamar‐Bouza, Laura
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance clodinafop (variant evaluated clodinafop‐propargyl)
title Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance clodinafop (variant evaluated clodinafop‐propargyl)
title_full Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance clodinafop (variant evaluated clodinafop‐propargyl)
title_fullStr Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance clodinafop (variant evaluated clodinafop‐propargyl)
title_full_unstemmed Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance clodinafop (variant evaluated clodinafop‐propargyl)
title_short Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance clodinafop (variant evaluated clodinafop‐propargyl)
title_sort peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance clodinafop (variant evaluated clodinafop‐propargyl)
topic Conclusion on Pesticides Peer Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7339173/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32665791
http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6151
work_keys_str_mv AT peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl
AT anastassiadoumaria peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl
AT arenamaria peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl
AT auteridomenica peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl
AT brancatoalba peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl
AT buralaszlo peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl
AT carrascocabreraluis peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl
AT chaideftoueugenia peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl
AT chiusoloarianna peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl
AT courtmarquesdaniele peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl
AT crivellentefederica peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl
AT delentdeckerchloe peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl
AT egsmosemark peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl
AT faitgabriella peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl
AT grecoluna peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl
AT ippolitoalessio peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl
AT istacefrederique peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl
AT jarrahsamira peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl
AT kardassidimitra peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl
AT leuschnerrenata peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl
AT lostiaalfonso peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl
AT lythgochristopher peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl
AT magransoriol peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl
AT mangasiris peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl
AT mironileana peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl
AT molnartunde peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl
AT padovanilaura peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl
AT parramortejuanmanuel peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl
AT pedersenragnor peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl
AT reichhermine peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl
AT santosmiguel peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl
AT serafimovarositsa peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl
AT sharprachel peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl
AT stanekalois peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl
AT sturmajuergen peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl
AT szentescsaba peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl
AT terronandrea peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl
AT tiramanimanuela peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl
AT vagenendebenedicte peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl
AT villamarbouzalaura peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl