Cargando…
Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance clodinafop (variant evaluated clodinafop‐propargyl)
The conclusions of the EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, Greece, and co‐rapporteur Member State, Germany, for the pesticide active substance clodinafop‐propargyl are reported. The context of the pee...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7339173/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32665791 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6151 |
_version_ | 1783554836311048192 |
---|---|
author | Anastassiadou, Maria Arena, Maria Auteri, Domenica Brancato, Alba Bura, Laszlo Carrasco Cabrera, Luis Chaideftou, Eugenia Chiusolo, Arianna Court Marques, Danièle Crivellente, Federica De Lentdecker, Chloe Egsmose, Mark Fait, Gabriella Greco, Luna Ippolito, Alessio Istace, Frederique Jarrah, Samira Kardassi, Dimitra Leuschner, Renata Lostia, Alfonso Lythgo, Christopher Magrans, Oriol Mangas, Iris Miron, Ileana Molnar, Tunde Padovani, Laura Parra Morte, Juan Manuel Pedersen, Ragnor Reich, Hermine Santos, Miguel Serafimova, Rositsa Sharp, Rachel Stanek, Alois Sturma, Juergen Szentes, Csaba Terron, Andrea Tiramani, Manuela Vagenende, Benedicte Villamar‐Bouza, Laura |
author_facet | Anastassiadou, Maria Arena, Maria Auteri, Domenica Brancato, Alba Bura, Laszlo Carrasco Cabrera, Luis Chaideftou, Eugenia Chiusolo, Arianna Court Marques, Danièle Crivellente, Federica De Lentdecker, Chloe Egsmose, Mark Fait, Gabriella Greco, Luna Ippolito, Alessio Istace, Frederique Jarrah, Samira Kardassi, Dimitra Leuschner, Renata Lostia, Alfonso Lythgo, Christopher Magrans, Oriol Mangas, Iris Miron, Ileana Molnar, Tunde Padovani, Laura Parra Morte, Juan Manuel Pedersen, Ragnor Reich, Hermine Santos, Miguel Serafimova, Rositsa Sharp, Rachel Stanek, Alois Sturma, Juergen Szentes, Csaba Terron, Andrea Tiramani, Manuela Vagenende, Benedicte Villamar‐Bouza, Laura |
collection | PubMed |
description | The conclusions of the EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, Greece, and co‐rapporteur Member State, Germany, for the pesticide active substance clodinafop‐propargyl are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of clodinafop‐propargyl as a herbicide on wheat, rye and triticale. The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified. The European Commission mandated EFSA to reconsider the acceptable operator exposure level (AOEL) setting and to update the non‐dietary exposure assessment if needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7339173 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73391732020-07-13 Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance clodinafop (variant evaluated clodinafop‐propargyl) Anastassiadou, Maria Arena, Maria Auteri, Domenica Brancato, Alba Bura, Laszlo Carrasco Cabrera, Luis Chaideftou, Eugenia Chiusolo, Arianna Court Marques, Danièle Crivellente, Federica De Lentdecker, Chloe Egsmose, Mark Fait, Gabriella Greco, Luna Ippolito, Alessio Istace, Frederique Jarrah, Samira Kardassi, Dimitra Leuschner, Renata Lostia, Alfonso Lythgo, Christopher Magrans, Oriol Mangas, Iris Miron, Ileana Molnar, Tunde Padovani, Laura Parra Morte, Juan Manuel Pedersen, Ragnor Reich, Hermine Santos, Miguel Serafimova, Rositsa Sharp, Rachel Stanek, Alois Sturma, Juergen Szentes, Csaba Terron, Andrea Tiramani, Manuela Vagenende, Benedicte Villamar‐Bouza, Laura EFSA J Conclusion on Pesticides Peer Review The conclusions of the EFSA following the peer review of the initial risk assessments carried out by the competent authorities of the rapporteur Member State, Greece, and co‐rapporteur Member State, Germany, for the pesticide active substance clodinafop‐propargyl are reported. The context of the peer review was that required by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) No 844/2012. The conclusions were reached on the basis of the evaluation of the representative uses of clodinafop‐propargyl as a herbicide on wheat, rye and triticale. The reliable end points, appropriate for use in regulatory risk assessment, are presented. Missing information identified as being required by the regulatory framework is listed. Concerns are identified. The European Commission mandated EFSA to reconsider the acceptable operator exposure level (AOEL) setting and to update the non‐dietary exposure assessment if needed. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-07-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7339173/ /pubmed/32665791 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6151 Text en © 2020 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Conclusion on Pesticides Peer Review Anastassiadou, Maria Arena, Maria Auteri, Domenica Brancato, Alba Bura, Laszlo Carrasco Cabrera, Luis Chaideftou, Eugenia Chiusolo, Arianna Court Marques, Danièle Crivellente, Federica De Lentdecker, Chloe Egsmose, Mark Fait, Gabriella Greco, Luna Ippolito, Alessio Istace, Frederique Jarrah, Samira Kardassi, Dimitra Leuschner, Renata Lostia, Alfonso Lythgo, Christopher Magrans, Oriol Mangas, Iris Miron, Ileana Molnar, Tunde Padovani, Laura Parra Morte, Juan Manuel Pedersen, Ragnor Reich, Hermine Santos, Miguel Serafimova, Rositsa Sharp, Rachel Stanek, Alois Sturma, Juergen Szentes, Csaba Terron, Andrea Tiramani, Manuela Vagenende, Benedicte Villamar‐Bouza, Laura Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance clodinafop (variant evaluated clodinafop‐propargyl) |
title | Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance clodinafop (variant evaluated clodinafop‐propargyl) |
title_full | Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance clodinafop (variant evaluated clodinafop‐propargyl) |
title_fullStr | Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance clodinafop (variant evaluated clodinafop‐propargyl) |
title_full_unstemmed | Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance clodinafop (variant evaluated clodinafop‐propargyl) |
title_short | Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance clodinafop (variant evaluated clodinafop‐propargyl) |
title_sort | peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance clodinafop (variant evaluated clodinafop‐propargyl) |
topic | Conclusion on Pesticides Peer Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7339173/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32665791 http://dx.doi.org/10.2903/j.efsa.2020.6151 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl AT anastassiadoumaria peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl AT arenamaria peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl AT auteridomenica peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl AT brancatoalba peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl AT buralaszlo peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl AT carrascocabreraluis peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl AT chaideftoueugenia peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl AT chiusoloarianna peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl AT courtmarquesdaniele peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl AT crivellentefederica peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl AT delentdeckerchloe peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl AT egsmosemark peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl AT faitgabriella peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl AT grecoluna peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl AT ippolitoalessio peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl AT istacefrederique peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl AT jarrahsamira peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl AT kardassidimitra peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl AT leuschnerrenata peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl AT lostiaalfonso peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl AT lythgochristopher peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl AT magransoriol peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl AT mangasiris peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl AT mironileana peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl AT molnartunde peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl AT padovanilaura peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl AT parramortejuanmanuel peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl AT pedersenragnor peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl AT reichhermine peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl AT santosmiguel peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl AT serafimovarositsa peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl AT sharprachel peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl AT stanekalois peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl AT sturmajuergen peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl AT szentescsaba peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl AT terronandrea peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl AT tiramanimanuela peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl AT vagenendebenedicte peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl AT villamarbouzalaura peerreviewofthepesticideriskassessmentoftheactivesubstanceclodinafopvariantevaluatedclodinafoppropargyl |