Cargando…
Improvements in Cleft Lip Aesthetics with the Fisher Repair Compared to the Mohler Repair
BACKGROUND: The extended Mohler rotation-advancement repair and the Fisher anatomic subunit repair are commonly used for the surgical correction of unilateral cleft lip. The rotation-advancement repair was the initial technique of choice by the senior surgeon. However, due to recurring suboptimal ae...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer Health
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7339201/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32766066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002919 |
_version_ | 1783554842714701824 |
---|---|
author | Mittermiller, Paul A. Martin, Shanique Johns, Dana N. Perrault, David Jablonka, Eric M. Khosla, Rohit K. |
author_facet | Mittermiller, Paul A. Martin, Shanique Johns, Dana N. Perrault, David Jablonka, Eric M. Khosla, Rohit K. |
author_sort | Mittermiller, Paul A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The extended Mohler rotation-advancement repair and the Fisher anatomic subunit repair are commonly used for the surgical correction of unilateral cleft lip. The rotation-advancement repair was the initial technique of choice by the senior surgeon. However, due to recurring suboptimal aesthetic results, the senior surgeon transitioned to the anatomic subunit repair. This study was performed to compare the outcomes of the rotation-advancement repair and the anatomic subunit repair. METHODS: A retrospective study of all consecutive patients undergoing unilateral cleft lip repair by the senior author between 2009 and 2016 was conducted. Demographic data, the presence of scar shortening/contraction, hypertrophy, widening, and revision rates were recorded. RESULTS: There were 68 patients identified for inclusion. Thirty-four patients had a rotation-advancement repair and 35 had an anatomic subunit repair. Twelve patients (36%) with the rotation-advancement repair and 1 patient (2.9%) with the subunit repair required anterior lip revision (P < 0.001). Conversely, 2 patients (6.1%) with the rotation-advancement repair and 13 patients (37.1%) with the subunit repair required minor debulking of excess red vermilion fullness (P < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Transitioning from the rotation-advancement repair to the anatomic subunit repair has resulted in improved lip aesthetics with decreased incidence of scar contracture, hypertrophy, and widening as evidenced by a decrease in the revision rate for these suboptimal scars. However, the rate of debulking procedures of the red vermilion did increase early in the adoption of the anatomic subunit repair, requiring minor modifications in the technique. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7339201 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer Health |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73392012020-08-05 Improvements in Cleft Lip Aesthetics with the Fisher Repair Compared to the Mohler Repair Mittermiller, Paul A. Martin, Shanique Johns, Dana N. Perrault, David Jablonka, Eric M. Khosla, Rohit K. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open Pediatric/Craniofacial BACKGROUND: The extended Mohler rotation-advancement repair and the Fisher anatomic subunit repair are commonly used for the surgical correction of unilateral cleft lip. The rotation-advancement repair was the initial technique of choice by the senior surgeon. However, due to recurring suboptimal aesthetic results, the senior surgeon transitioned to the anatomic subunit repair. This study was performed to compare the outcomes of the rotation-advancement repair and the anatomic subunit repair. METHODS: A retrospective study of all consecutive patients undergoing unilateral cleft lip repair by the senior author between 2009 and 2016 was conducted. Demographic data, the presence of scar shortening/contraction, hypertrophy, widening, and revision rates were recorded. RESULTS: There were 68 patients identified for inclusion. Thirty-four patients had a rotation-advancement repair and 35 had an anatomic subunit repair. Twelve patients (36%) with the rotation-advancement repair and 1 patient (2.9%) with the subunit repair required anterior lip revision (P < 0.001). Conversely, 2 patients (6.1%) with the rotation-advancement repair and 13 patients (37.1%) with the subunit repair required minor debulking of excess red vermilion fullness (P < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Transitioning from the rotation-advancement repair to the anatomic subunit repair has resulted in improved lip aesthetics with decreased incidence of scar contracture, hypertrophy, and widening as evidenced by a decrease in the revision rate for these suboptimal scars. However, the rate of debulking procedures of the red vermilion did increase early in the adoption of the anatomic subunit repair, requiring minor modifications in the technique. Wolters Kluwer Health 2020-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7339201/ /pubmed/32766066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002919 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (CCBY-NC-ND) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | Pediatric/Craniofacial Mittermiller, Paul A. Martin, Shanique Johns, Dana N. Perrault, David Jablonka, Eric M. Khosla, Rohit K. Improvements in Cleft Lip Aesthetics with the Fisher Repair Compared to the Mohler Repair |
title | Improvements in Cleft Lip Aesthetics with the Fisher Repair Compared to the Mohler Repair |
title_full | Improvements in Cleft Lip Aesthetics with the Fisher Repair Compared to the Mohler Repair |
title_fullStr | Improvements in Cleft Lip Aesthetics with the Fisher Repair Compared to the Mohler Repair |
title_full_unstemmed | Improvements in Cleft Lip Aesthetics with the Fisher Repair Compared to the Mohler Repair |
title_short | Improvements in Cleft Lip Aesthetics with the Fisher Repair Compared to the Mohler Repair |
title_sort | improvements in cleft lip aesthetics with the fisher repair compared to the mohler repair |
topic | Pediatric/Craniofacial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7339201/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32766066 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000002919 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mittermillerpaula improvementsincleftlipaestheticswiththefisherrepaircomparedtothemohlerrepair AT martinshanique improvementsincleftlipaestheticswiththefisherrepaircomparedtothemohlerrepair AT johnsdanan improvementsincleftlipaestheticswiththefisherrepaircomparedtothemohlerrepair AT perraultdavid improvementsincleftlipaestheticswiththefisherrepaircomparedtothemohlerrepair AT jablonkaericm improvementsincleftlipaestheticswiththefisherrepaircomparedtothemohlerrepair AT khoslarohitk improvementsincleftlipaestheticswiththefisherrepaircomparedtothemohlerrepair |