Cargando…

Establishment and validation of a novel nomogram incorporating clinicopathological parameters into the TNM staging system to predict prognosis for stage II colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND: Survival outcomes are significantly different in stage II colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with diverse clinicopathological features. The objective of this study is to establish a credible prognostic nomogram incorporating easily obtained parameters for stage II CRC patients. METHODS: A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mo, Shaobo, Zhou, Zheng, Li, Yaqi, Hu, Xiang, Ma, Xiaoji, Zhang, Long, Cai, Sanjun, Peng, Junjie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7339452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32655317
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12935-020-01382-w
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Survival outcomes are significantly different in stage II colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with diverse clinicopathological features. The objective of this study is to establish a credible prognostic nomogram incorporating easily obtained parameters for stage II CRC patients. METHODS: A total of 1708 stage II CRC patients seen at Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (FUSCC) from 2008 to 2013 were retrospectively analyzed in this study. Cases were randomly separated into a training set (n = 1084) and a validation set (n = 624). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were used to identify independent prognostic factors that were subsequently incorporated into a nomogram. The performance of the nomogram was evaluated by the predicted concordance index (C-index) and ROC curve to calculate the area under the curve (AUC). The clinical utility of the nomogram was evaluated using decision curve analysis (DCA). RESULTS: In univariate and multivariate analyses, eight parameters were correlated with disease-free survival (DFS), which were subsequently selected to generate a prognostic nomogram based on DFS. For DFS predictions, the C-index values of the nomogram were 0.842 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.710–0.980), and 0.701 (95% CI 0.610–0.770) for the training and validation sets, respectively. The AUC values of the ROC curves for the nomogram to predicted 1, 3 and 5-year survival were 0.869, 0.858, and 0.777 (training group) and 0.673, 0.714, and 0.706 (validation group), respectively. The recurrence probability calibration curve showed good consistency between actual observations and nomogram-based predictions. DCA showed better clinical application value for the nomogram than the TNM staging system. CONCLUSION: A novel nomogram was established and validated in a large population, and the nomogram is a simple-to-use tool for physicians to facilitate postoperative personalized prognostic evaluation and determine therapeutic strategies for stage II CRC patients.