Cargando…

Effects of a work stress intervention on healthcare use and treatment compared to treatment as usual: a randomised controlled trial in Swedish primary healthcare

BACKGROUND: Work stress is an increasing burden in society. Identifying early symptoms of work stress in primary healthcare (PHC) could result in earlier and better-targeted care. The Work Stress Questionnaire (WSQ) was developed in PHC for this task. We aimed to evaluate whether the use of the WSQ,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sandheimer, Christine, Hedenrud, Tove, Hensing, Gunnel, Holmgren, Kristina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7339485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32631243
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01210-0
_version_ 1783554902154280960
author Sandheimer, Christine
Hedenrud, Tove
Hensing, Gunnel
Holmgren, Kristina
author_facet Sandheimer, Christine
Hedenrud, Tove
Hensing, Gunnel
Holmgren, Kristina
author_sort Sandheimer, Christine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Work stress is an increasing burden in society. Identifying early symptoms of work stress in primary healthcare (PHC) could result in earlier and better-targeted care. The Work Stress Questionnaire (WSQ) was developed in PHC for this task. We aimed to evaluate whether the use of the WSQ, in combination with physicians’ feedback, resulted in differences in healthcare visits and treatment compared to treatment as usual (TAU) in patients reporting high stress. Our hypothesis was that patients receiving the intervention would generate more visits to rehabilitation providers during follow-up compared to TAU. METHODS: A two-armed randomised controlled trial was conducted at seven primary healthcare centres (PHCCs) in Region Västra Götaland, Sweden. One group received the WSQ intervention, and the controls received TAU. Employed, not sick-listed persons aged 18–64 years who sought care for mental or physical health complaints at the PHCCs participated. Register data on healthcare visits and treatments 12 months prior to inclusion and 12 months after were obtained and analysed with Fisher’s exact test together with questionnaire data (WSQ and background features). RESULTS: A total of 271 participants were included in the study, 132 intervention and 139 controls. Visits to psychologists/psychotherapists were higher among intervention participants with high stress (20%, n = 87) during follow-up compared to corresponding controls (7%, n = 97) (p < 0.05). Collaborative care measures were more common among the stressed intervention participants (23%) post-inclusion compared to the stressed controls (11%) (p < 0.05). The amount of received cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) was higher among the stressed intervention group (16%) than among controls (10%) during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention group that used the WSQ with physicians’ feedback had an increased number of rehabilitative measures and treatment more in line with established guidelines compared to treatment as usual. Findings of the study indicate that the WSQ can assist in identifying work stress in primary healthcare and contribute to physicians’ recommendations of suitable rehabilitative measures at an earlier stage compared to treatment as usual. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT02480855. Registered 20 May 2015.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7339485
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73394852020-07-09 Effects of a work stress intervention on healthcare use and treatment compared to treatment as usual: a randomised controlled trial in Swedish primary healthcare Sandheimer, Christine Hedenrud, Tove Hensing, Gunnel Holmgren, Kristina BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Work stress is an increasing burden in society. Identifying early symptoms of work stress in primary healthcare (PHC) could result in earlier and better-targeted care. The Work Stress Questionnaire (WSQ) was developed in PHC for this task. We aimed to evaluate whether the use of the WSQ, in combination with physicians’ feedback, resulted in differences in healthcare visits and treatment compared to treatment as usual (TAU) in patients reporting high stress. Our hypothesis was that patients receiving the intervention would generate more visits to rehabilitation providers during follow-up compared to TAU. METHODS: A two-armed randomised controlled trial was conducted at seven primary healthcare centres (PHCCs) in Region Västra Götaland, Sweden. One group received the WSQ intervention, and the controls received TAU. Employed, not sick-listed persons aged 18–64 years who sought care for mental or physical health complaints at the PHCCs participated. Register data on healthcare visits and treatments 12 months prior to inclusion and 12 months after were obtained and analysed with Fisher’s exact test together with questionnaire data (WSQ and background features). RESULTS: A total of 271 participants were included in the study, 132 intervention and 139 controls. Visits to psychologists/psychotherapists were higher among intervention participants with high stress (20%, n = 87) during follow-up compared to corresponding controls (7%, n = 97) (p < 0.05). Collaborative care measures were more common among the stressed intervention participants (23%) post-inclusion compared to the stressed controls (11%) (p < 0.05). The amount of received cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) was higher among the stressed intervention group (16%) than among controls (10%) during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The intervention group that used the WSQ with physicians’ feedback had an increased number of rehabilitative measures and treatment more in line with established guidelines compared to treatment as usual. Findings of the study indicate that the WSQ can assist in identifying work stress in primary healthcare and contribute to physicians’ recommendations of suitable rehabilitative measures at an earlier stage compared to treatment as usual. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov. Identifier: NCT02480855. Registered 20 May 2015. BioMed Central 2020-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7339485/ /pubmed/32631243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01210-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sandheimer, Christine
Hedenrud, Tove
Hensing, Gunnel
Holmgren, Kristina
Effects of a work stress intervention on healthcare use and treatment compared to treatment as usual: a randomised controlled trial in Swedish primary healthcare
title Effects of a work stress intervention on healthcare use and treatment compared to treatment as usual: a randomised controlled trial in Swedish primary healthcare
title_full Effects of a work stress intervention on healthcare use and treatment compared to treatment as usual: a randomised controlled trial in Swedish primary healthcare
title_fullStr Effects of a work stress intervention on healthcare use and treatment compared to treatment as usual: a randomised controlled trial in Swedish primary healthcare
title_full_unstemmed Effects of a work stress intervention on healthcare use and treatment compared to treatment as usual: a randomised controlled trial in Swedish primary healthcare
title_short Effects of a work stress intervention on healthcare use and treatment compared to treatment as usual: a randomised controlled trial in Swedish primary healthcare
title_sort effects of a work stress intervention on healthcare use and treatment compared to treatment as usual: a randomised controlled trial in swedish primary healthcare
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7339485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32631243
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12875-020-01210-0
work_keys_str_mv AT sandheimerchristine effectsofaworkstressinterventiononhealthcareuseandtreatmentcomparedtotreatmentasusualarandomisedcontrolledtrialinswedishprimaryhealthcare
AT hedenrudtove effectsofaworkstressinterventiononhealthcareuseandtreatmentcomparedtotreatmentasusualarandomisedcontrolledtrialinswedishprimaryhealthcare
AT hensinggunnel effectsofaworkstressinterventiononhealthcareuseandtreatmentcomparedtotreatmentasusualarandomisedcontrolledtrialinswedishprimaryhealthcare
AT holmgrenkristina effectsofaworkstressinterventiononhealthcareuseandtreatmentcomparedtotreatmentasusualarandomisedcontrolledtrialinswedishprimaryhealthcare