Cargando…

Comparative whole genome DNA methylation profiling across cattle tissues reveals global and tissue-specific methylation patterns

BACKGROUND: Efforts to improve animal health, and understand genetic bases for production, may benefit from a comprehensive analysis of animal genomes and epigenomes. Although DNA methylation has been well studied in humans and other model species, its distribution patterns and regulatory impacts in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhou, Yang, Liu, Shuli, Hu, Yan, Fang, Lingzhao, Gao, Yahui, Xia, Han, Schroeder, Steven G., Rosen, Benjamin D., Connor, Erin E., Li, Cong-jun, Baldwin, Ransom L., Cole, John B., Van Tassell, Curtis P., Yang, Liguo, Ma, Li, Liu, George E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7339546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32631327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-020-00793-5
_version_ 1783554914411085824
author Zhou, Yang
Liu, Shuli
Hu, Yan
Fang, Lingzhao
Gao, Yahui
Xia, Han
Schroeder, Steven G.
Rosen, Benjamin D.
Connor, Erin E.
Li, Cong-jun
Baldwin, Ransom L.
Cole, John B.
Van Tassell, Curtis P.
Yang, Liguo
Ma, Li
Liu, George E.
author_facet Zhou, Yang
Liu, Shuli
Hu, Yan
Fang, Lingzhao
Gao, Yahui
Xia, Han
Schroeder, Steven G.
Rosen, Benjamin D.
Connor, Erin E.
Li, Cong-jun
Baldwin, Ransom L.
Cole, John B.
Van Tassell, Curtis P.
Yang, Liguo
Ma, Li
Liu, George E.
author_sort Zhou, Yang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Efforts to improve animal health, and understand genetic bases for production, may benefit from a comprehensive analysis of animal genomes and epigenomes. Although DNA methylation has been well studied in humans and other model species, its distribution patterns and regulatory impacts in cattle are still largely unknown. Here, we present the largest collection of cattle DNA methylation epigenomic data to date. RESULTS: Using Holstein cattle, we generated 29 whole genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) datasets for 16 tissues, 47 corresponding RNA-seq datasets, and 2 whole genome sequencing datasets. We did read mapping and DNA methylation calling based on two different cattle assemblies, demonstrating the high quality of the long-read-based assembly markedly improved DNA methylation results. We observed large differences across cattle tissues in the methylation patterns of global CpG sites, partially methylated domains (PMDs), hypomethylated regions (HMRs), CG islands (CGIs), and common repeats. We detected that each tissue had a distinct set of PMDs, which showed tissue-specific patterns. Similar to human PMD, cattle PMDs were often linked to a general decrease of gene expression and a decrease in active histone marks and related to long-range chromatin organizations, like topologically associated domains (TADs). We tested a classification of the HMRs based on their distributions relative to transcription start sites (TSSs) and detected tissue-specific TSS-HMRs and genes that showed strong tissue effects. When performing cross-species comparisons of paired genes (two opposite strand genes with their TSS located in the same HMR), we found out they were more consistently co-expressed among human, mouse, sheep, goat, yak, pig, and chicken, but showed lower consistent ratios in more divergent species. We further used these WGBS data to detect 50,023 experimentally supported CGIs across bovine tissues and found that they might function as a guard against C-to-T mutations for TSS-HMRs. Although common repeats were often heavily methylated, some young Bov-A2 repeats were hypomethylated in sperm and could affect the promoter structures by exposing potential transcription factor binding sites. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a comprehensive resource for bovine epigenomic research and enables new discoveries about DNA methylation and its role in complex traits.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7339546
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73395462020-07-09 Comparative whole genome DNA methylation profiling across cattle tissues reveals global and tissue-specific methylation patterns Zhou, Yang Liu, Shuli Hu, Yan Fang, Lingzhao Gao, Yahui Xia, Han Schroeder, Steven G. Rosen, Benjamin D. Connor, Erin E. Li, Cong-jun Baldwin, Ransom L. Cole, John B. Van Tassell, Curtis P. Yang, Liguo Ma, Li Liu, George E. BMC Biol Research Article BACKGROUND: Efforts to improve animal health, and understand genetic bases for production, may benefit from a comprehensive analysis of animal genomes and epigenomes. Although DNA methylation has been well studied in humans and other model species, its distribution patterns and regulatory impacts in cattle are still largely unknown. Here, we present the largest collection of cattle DNA methylation epigenomic data to date. RESULTS: Using Holstein cattle, we generated 29 whole genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) datasets for 16 tissues, 47 corresponding RNA-seq datasets, and 2 whole genome sequencing datasets. We did read mapping and DNA methylation calling based on two different cattle assemblies, demonstrating the high quality of the long-read-based assembly markedly improved DNA methylation results. We observed large differences across cattle tissues in the methylation patterns of global CpG sites, partially methylated domains (PMDs), hypomethylated regions (HMRs), CG islands (CGIs), and common repeats. We detected that each tissue had a distinct set of PMDs, which showed tissue-specific patterns. Similar to human PMD, cattle PMDs were often linked to a general decrease of gene expression and a decrease in active histone marks and related to long-range chromatin organizations, like topologically associated domains (TADs). We tested a classification of the HMRs based on their distributions relative to transcription start sites (TSSs) and detected tissue-specific TSS-HMRs and genes that showed strong tissue effects. When performing cross-species comparisons of paired genes (two opposite strand genes with their TSS located in the same HMR), we found out they were more consistently co-expressed among human, mouse, sheep, goat, yak, pig, and chicken, but showed lower consistent ratios in more divergent species. We further used these WGBS data to detect 50,023 experimentally supported CGIs across bovine tissues and found that they might function as a guard against C-to-T mutations for TSS-HMRs. Although common repeats were often heavily methylated, some young Bov-A2 repeats were hypomethylated in sperm and could affect the promoter structures by exposing potential transcription factor binding sites. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a comprehensive resource for bovine epigenomic research and enables new discoveries about DNA methylation and its role in complex traits. BioMed Central 2020-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7339546/ /pubmed/32631327 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-020-00793-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhou, Yang
Liu, Shuli
Hu, Yan
Fang, Lingzhao
Gao, Yahui
Xia, Han
Schroeder, Steven G.
Rosen, Benjamin D.
Connor, Erin E.
Li, Cong-jun
Baldwin, Ransom L.
Cole, John B.
Van Tassell, Curtis P.
Yang, Liguo
Ma, Li
Liu, George E.
Comparative whole genome DNA methylation profiling across cattle tissues reveals global and tissue-specific methylation patterns
title Comparative whole genome DNA methylation profiling across cattle tissues reveals global and tissue-specific methylation patterns
title_full Comparative whole genome DNA methylation profiling across cattle tissues reveals global and tissue-specific methylation patterns
title_fullStr Comparative whole genome DNA methylation profiling across cattle tissues reveals global and tissue-specific methylation patterns
title_full_unstemmed Comparative whole genome DNA methylation profiling across cattle tissues reveals global and tissue-specific methylation patterns
title_short Comparative whole genome DNA methylation profiling across cattle tissues reveals global and tissue-specific methylation patterns
title_sort comparative whole genome dna methylation profiling across cattle tissues reveals global and tissue-specific methylation patterns
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7339546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32631327
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12915-020-00793-5
work_keys_str_mv AT zhouyang comparativewholegenomednamethylationprofilingacrosscattletissuesrevealsglobalandtissuespecificmethylationpatterns
AT liushuli comparativewholegenomednamethylationprofilingacrosscattletissuesrevealsglobalandtissuespecificmethylationpatterns
AT huyan comparativewholegenomednamethylationprofilingacrosscattletissuesrevealsglobalandtissuespecificmethylationpatterns
AT fanglingzhao comparativewholegenomednamethylationprofilingacrosscattletissuesrevealsglobalandtissuespecificmethylationpatterns
AT gaoyahui comparativewholegenomednamethylationprofilingacrosscattletissuesrevealsglobalandtissuespecificmethylationpatterns
AT xiahan comparativewholegenomednamethylationprofilingacrosscattletissuesrevealsglobalandtissuespecificmethylationpatterns
AT schroedersteveng comparativewholegenomednamethylationprofilingacrosscattletissuesrevealsglobalandtissuespecificmethylationpatterns
AT rosenbenjamind comparativewholegenomednamethylationprofilingacrosscattletissuesrevealsglobalandtissuespecificmethylationpatterns
AT connorerine comparativewholegenomednamethylationprofilingacrosscattletissuesrevealsglobalandtissuespecificmethylationpatterns
AT licongjun comparativewholegenomednamethylationprofilingacrosscattletissuesrevealsglobalandtissuespecificmethylationpatterns
AT baldwinransoml comparativewholegenomednamethylationprofilingacrosscattletissuesrevealsglobalandtissuespecificmethylationpatterns
AT colejohnb comparativewholegenomednamethylationprofilingacrosscattletissuesrevealsglobalandtissuespecificmethylationpatterns
AT vantassellcurtisp comparativewholegenomednamethylationprofilingacrosscattletissuesrevealsglobalandtissuespecificmethylationpatterns
AT yangliguo comparativewholegenomednamethylationprofilingacrosscattletissuesrevealsglobalandtissuespecificmethylationpatterns
AT mali comparativewholegenomednamethylationprofilingacrosscattletissuesrevealsglobalandtissuespecificmethylationpatterns
AT liugeorgee comparativewholegenomednamethylationprofilingacrosscattletissuesrevealsglobalandtissuespecificmethylationpatterns