Cargando…

The role of Visual Evoked Potential (VEP) in monitoring the progression and in guiding the treatment of glaucoma patients with poor compliance

Objectives: The objectives of the present study were to analyze the possibility of using pattern VEPs (VEP of pattern type) in glaucoma patients and their role in the follow-up and coordination/ management of anti-glaucoma treatment. Patients and Methods: This is a prospective study on 54 eyes of 30...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Firan, Anne Marie, Iancu, Raluca Claudia, Bujor, Inna Adriana, Ciuluvică, Radu Constantin, Tudosescu, Ruxandra, Ungureanu, Emil, Pașca, Irena Gabriela, Voinea, Liliana, Istrate, Sînziana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Romanian Society of Ophthalmology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7339685/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32685788
Descripción
Sumario:Objectives: The objectives of the present study were to analyze the possibility of using pattern VEPs (VEP of pattern type) in glaucoma patients and their role in the follow-up and coordination/ management of anti-glaucoma treatment. Patients and Methods: This is a prospective study on 54 eyes of 30 consecutive glaucoma patients, whose compliance capacity did not allow automatic perimetry and OCT scan to be carried out. The patients were divided into two groups: group A – the study group and group B – the control group. All patients underwent FO exam and pachymetry, plus VEP exam for group A patients. Patients were analyzed at the initial visit and at 1 month, 3, 6, 12 months. Statistical analysis was made using t-test, ANOVA, Fisher test and Pearson correlation coefficient. Results: These participants presented a positive correlation between C/ D ratio and the latency of the P100 wave at 1 degree and a negative correlation between C/ D ratio and the amplitude of the P100 wave both at 1 degree (60 arc minutes) and at 0.25 degrees (15 arc minutes). During the study, the values of the latent P100 changed statistically at 6 months and at 1 year. Using all the data, the authors of the study considered it necessary to modify the treatment for 2 patients out of 13 in group B and for 9 patients out of 16 in group A (p = 0,02892). Conclusions: VEP supplies additional/ further data that significantly help guiding the treatment and monitoring the progression, therefore, it should be part of the routine examination for these patients. Further studies are necessary to deepen our understanding of the visual evoked potentials utility.