Cargando…

Evaluation of safety and efficacy of different protocols of collagen cross linking for keratoconus

Introduction: Collagen cross-linking is a well-established modality that could stop the keratoconus from progressing. Off late, newer protocols have been suggested for progressive keratoconus, which include the use of hypoosmolar riboflavin for thinner corneas and the use of accelerated CXL protocol...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Tanu, Taneja, Mukesh, Murthy, Somasheila, Vaddavalli, Pravin Krishna
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Romanian Society of Ophthalmology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7339692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32685782
_version_ 1783554935124656128
author Singh, Tanu
Taneja, Mukesh
Murthy, Somasheila
Vaddavalli, Pravin Krishna
author_facet Singh, Tanu
Taneja, Mukesh
Murthy, Somasheila
Vaddavalli, Pravin Krishna
author_sort Singh, Tanu
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Collagen cross-linking is a well-established modality that could stop the keratoconus from progressing. Off late, newer protocols have been suggested for progressive keratoconus, which include the use of hypoosmolar riboflavin for thinner corneas and the use of accelerated CXL protocol to reduce the effective treatment time. Objective: To assess the safety and efficacy of different protocols of conventional CXL, hypoosmolar CXL and accelerated CXL in patients with keratoconus. Materials & methods: It was a prospective, interventional study with minimum of 12 months follow-up. Patients were divided into 3 groups; conventional CXL, CXL using hypotonic riboflavin and accelerated CXL group. Primary outcome measures - For efficacy, Sim Kmax and Sim Kmin (Progression (Kmax > +1 D), stabilization (Kmax +1 D to -1 D) and regression (Kmax > -1 D). For safety - endothelial count evaluation (decrease >10% amounted to compromise the safety of the procedure). Secondary outcome measures - BCVA and adverse events. Results: 32 eyes underwent isotonic CXL treatment. Pre-treatment and post-treatment BCVA were 0.16 +/- 0.15 and 0.10 +/- 0.11 log MAR; specular counts 2782.81 +/- 307.25 (cells/ mm2) and 2708.5 +/- 263.27 (cells/ mm2) (p=0.05); KMax values 55.31 +/- 4.12 D and 53.9 +/- 3.77 D (p=0.0001). 16 eyes underwent hypotonic CXL treatment. Pre-treatment and post-treatment BCVA were 0.15 +/- 0.13 log MAR and 0.14 +/- 0.14; specular count 2701.19 +/- 243.25 (cells/ mm2) and 2713.5 +/- 369 (cells/ mm2) (p= 1) and KMax values 54.74 +/- 7.44 D and 52.74 +/- 6.76 D (p = 0.002). 15 eyes underwent accelerated CXL treatment. Pre-treatment and post-treatment BCVA were 0.16 +/- 0.15 and 0.10 +/- 0.12 log MAR; specular counts 2967.53 +/- 356.48 and 2893.07 +/- 336.55 (cells/ mm2) (p = 0.78) and KMax values 55.19 +/- 5.46 D and 54.24 +/- 5.33 D (p = 0.337). Conclusion: All three protocols appeared safe and efficacious as therapeutic regimen for progressive keratoconus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7339692
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Romanian Society of Ophthalmology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73396922020-07-17 Evaluation of safety and efficacy of different protocols of collagen cross linking for keratoconus Singh, Tanu Taneja, Mukesh Murthy, Somasheila Vaddavalli, Pravin Krishna Rom J Ophthalmol General Articles Introduction: Collagen cross-linking is a well-established modality that could stop the keratoconus from progressing. Off late, newer protocols have been suggested for progressive keratoconus, which include the use of hypoosmolar riboflavin for thinner corneas and the use of accelerated CXL protocol to reduce the effective treatment time. Objective: To assess the safety and efficacy of different protocols of conventional CXL, hypoosmolar CXL and accelerated CXL in patients with keratoconus. Materials & methods: It was a prospective, interventional study with minimum of 12 months follow-up. Patients were divided into 3 groups; conventional CXL, CXL using hypotonic riboflavin and accelerated CXL group. Primary outcome measures - For efficacy, Sim Kmax and Sim Kmin (Progression (Kmax > +1 D), stabilization (Kmax +1 D to -1 D) and regression (Kmax > -1 D). For safety - endothelial count evaluation (decrease >10% amounted to compromise the safety of the procedure). Secondary outcome measures - BCVA and adverse events. Results: 32 eyes underwent isotonic CXL treatment. Pre-treatment and post-treatment BCVA were 0.16 +/- 0.15 and 0.10 +/- 0.11 log MAR; specular counts 2782.81 +/- 307.25 (cells/ mm2) and 2708.5 +/- 263.27 (cells/ mm2) (p=0.05); KMax values 55.31 +/- 4.12 D and 53.9 +/- 3.77 D (p=0.0001). 16 eyes underwent hypotonic CXL treatment. Pre-treatment and post-treatment BCVA were 0.15 +/- 0.13 log MAR and 0.14 +/- 0.14; specular count 2701.19 +/- 243.25 (cells/ mm2) and 2713.5 +/- 369 (cells/ mm2) (p= 1) and KMax values 54.74 +/- 7.44 D and 52.74 +/- 6.76 D (p = 0.002). 15 eyes underwent accelerated CXL treatment. Pre-treatment and post-treatment BCVA were 0.16 +/- 0.15 and 0.10 +/- 0.12 log MAR; specular counts 2967.53 +/- 356.48 and 2893.07 +/- 336.55 (cells/ mm2) (p = 0.78) and KMax values 55.19 +/- 5.46 D and 54.24 +/- 5.33 D (p = 0.337). Conclusion: All three protocols appeared safe and efficacious as therapeutic regimen for progressive keratoconus. Romanian Society of Ophthalmology 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7339692/ /pubmed/32685782 Text en ©Romanian Society of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle General Articles
Singh, Tanu
Taneja, Mukesh
Murthy, Somasheila
Vaddavalli, Pravin Krishna
Evaluation of safety and efficacy of different protocols of collagen cross linking for keratoconus
title Evaluation of safety and efficacy of different protocols of collagen cross linking for keratoconus
title_full Evaluation of safety and efficacy of different protocols of collagen cross linking for keratoconus
title_fullStr Evaluation of safety and efficacy of different protocols of collagen cross linking for keratoconus
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of safety and efficacy of different protocols of collagen cross linking for keratoconus
title_short Evaluation of safety and efficacy of different protocols of collagen cross linking for keratoconus
title_sort evaluation of safety and efficacy of different protocols of collagen cross linking for keratoconus
topic General Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7339692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32685782
work_keys_str_mv AT singhtanu evaluationofsafetyandefficacyofdifferentprotocolsofcollagencrosslinkingforkeratoconus
AT tanejamukesh evaluationofsafetyandefficacyofdifferentprotocolsofcollagencrosslinkingforkeratoconus
AT murthysomasheila evaluationofsafetyandefficacyofdifferentprotocolsofcollagencrosslinkingforkeratoconus
AT vaddavallipravinkrishna evaluationofsafetyandefficacyofdifferentprotocolsofcollagencrosslinkingforkeratoconus