Cargando…

A narrative systematic review of tobacco cessation interventions in Sub-Saharan Africa

AIM: In the face of increasing tobacco consumption in Sub-Saharan Africa, it is crucial to not only curb the uptake of tobacco, but to ensure that tobacco users quit. Considering the minimal attention that tobacco cessation interventions receive in Sub-Saharan Africa, this review aims to describe st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Peer, Nasheeta, Naicker, Ashika, Khan, Munira, Kengne, Andre-Pascal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7340350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32676190
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312120936907
_version_ 1783555035064434688
author Peer, Nasheeta
Naicker, Ashika
Khan, Munira
Kengne, Andre-Pascal
author_facet Peer, Nasheeta
Naicker, Ashika
Khan, Munira
Kengne, Andre-Pascal
author_sort Peer, Nasheeta
collection PubMed
description AIM: In the face of increasing tobacco consumption in Sub-Saharan Africa, it is crucial to not only curb the uptake of tobacco, but to ensure that tobacco users quit. Considering the minimal attention that tobacco cessation interventions receive in Sub-Saharan Africa, this review aims to describe studies that evaluated tobacco cessation interventions in the region. METHODS: A search of studies published till December 2019 that evaluated tobacco cessation interventions in Sub-Saharan Africa and examined tobacco quit rates was conducted in PubMed-Medline, Web of Science and Scopus. Study designs were not limited to randomised control trials but needed to include a control group. RESULTS: Of the 454 titles and abstracts reviewed, eight studies, all conducted in South Africa, were included. The earliest publication was from 1988 and the most recent from 2019. Five studies were randomised control trials, two were quasi-experimental and one was a case–control study. Populations studied included community-based smokers (four studies) and university students, while the relevant clinic-based studies were conducted in pregnant women, tuberculosis patients and HIV-infected patients. Sample sizes were 23 in the case–control study, 87–561 in randomised control trials, and 979 (pregnant women) and 4090 (three rural communities) in the quasi-experimental studies. Four studies included nicotine replacement therapy in the interventions while four utilised only psychotherapy without adjunct pharmacotherapy. Quit rates were evaluated by exhaled carbon monoxide levels (five studies), blood carbon monoxide, urinary cotinine levels and self-reported quit rates. Four studies (two each with and without pharmacotherapy) reported significantly better outcomes in the intervention versus the control groups while one study findings (without pharmacotherapy) were significant in women but not men. CONCLUSION: This review highlights that scant attention has been paid to tobacco cessation intervention in Sub-Saharan Africa. The heterogeneity of these studies precluded comparisons across interventions or populations. There is a need for evidence-based low-cost tobacco cessation intervention that target high-risk population in Sub-Saharan Africa.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7340350
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73403502020-07-15 A narrative systematic review of tobacco cessation interventions in Sub-Saharan Africa Peer, Nasheeta Naicker, Ashika Khan, Munira Kengne, Andre-Pascal SAGE Open Med Systematic Review AIM: In the face of increasing tobacco consumption in Sub-Saharan Africa, it is crucial to not only curb the uptake of tobacco, but to ensure that tobacco users quit. Considering the minimal attention that tobacco cessation interventions receive in Sub-Saharan Africa, this review aims to describe studies that evaluated tobacco cessation interventions in the region. METHODS: A search of studies published till December 2019 that evaluated tobacco cessation interventions in Sub-Saharan Africa and examined tobacco quit rates was conducted in PubMed-Medline, Web of Science and Scopus. Study designs were not limited to randomised control trials but needed to include a control group. RESULTS: Of the 454 titles and abstracts reviewed, eight studies, all conducted in South Africa, were included. The earliest publication was from 1988 and the most recent from 2019. Five studies were randomised control trials, two were quasi-experimental and one was a case–control study. Populations studied included community-based smokers (four studies) and university students, while the relevant clinic-based studies were conducted in pregnant women, tuberculosis patients and HIV-infected patients. Sample sizes were 23 in the case–control study, 87–561 in randomised control trials, and 979 (pregnant women) and 4090 (three rural communities) in the quasi-experimental studies. Four studies included nicotine replacement therapy in the interventions while four utilised only psychotherapy without adjunct pharmacotherapy. Quit rates were evaluated by exhaled carbon monoxide levels (five studies), blood carbon monoxide, urinary cotinine levels and self-reported quit rates. Four studies (two each with and without pharmacotherapy) reported significantly better outcomes in the intervention versus the control groups while one study findings (without pharmacotherapy) were significant in women but not men. CONCLUSION: This review highlights that scant attention has been paid to tobacco cessation intervention in Sub-Saharan Africa. The heterogeneity of these studies precluded comparisons across interventions or populations. There is a need for evidence-based low-cost tobacco cessation intervention that target high-risk population in Sub-Saharan Africa. SAGE Publications 2020-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7340350/ /pubmed/32676190 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312120936907 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Peer, Nasheeta
Naicker, Ashika
Khan, Munira
Kengne, Andre-Pascal
A narrative systematic review of tobacco cessation interventions in Sub-Saharan Africa
title A narrative systematic review of tobacco cessation interventions in Sub-Saharan Africa
title_full A narrative systematic review of tobacco cessation interventions in Sub-Saharan Africa
title_fullStr A narrative systematic review of tobacco cessation interventions in Sub-Saharan Africa
title_full_unstemmed A narrative systematic review of tobacco cessation interventions in Sub-Saharan Africa
title_short A narrative systematic review of tobacco cessation interventions in Sub-Saharan Africa
title_sort narrative systematic review of tobacco cessation interventions in sub-saharan africa
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7340350/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32676190
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2050312120936907
work_keys_str_mv AT peernasheeta anarrativesystematicreviewoftobaccocessationinterventionsinsubsaharanafrica
AT naickerashika anarrativesystematicreviewoftobaccocessationinterventionsinsubsaharanafrica
AT khanmunira anarrativesystematicreviewoftobaccocessationinterventionsinsubsaharanafrica
AT kengneandrepascal anarrativesystematicreviewoftobaccocessationinterventionsinsubsaharanafrica
AT peernasheeta narrativesystematicreviewoftobaccocessationinterventionsinsubsaharanafrica
AT naickerashika narrativesystematicreviewoftobaccocessationinterventionsinsubsaharanafrica
AT khanmunira narrativesystematicreviewoftobaccocessationinterventionsinsubsaharanafrica
AT kengneandrepascal narrativesystematicreviewoftobaccocessationinterventionsinsubsaharanafrica