Cargando…

Sigmoid resection with primary anastomosis versus the Hartmann’s procedure for perforated diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE: The optimal surgical approach for perforated diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis (Hinchey grade III or IV) remains debated. In recent years, accumulating evidence comparing sigmoid resection with primary anastomosis (PA) with the Hartmann’s procedure (HP) was presented. Theref...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lambrichts, Daniël PV, Edomskis, Pim P, van der Bogt, Ruben D, Kleinrensink, Gert-Jan, Bemelman, Willem A, Lange, Johan F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7340681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32504331
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-020-03617-8
_version_ 1783555082150739968
author Lambrichts, Daniël PV
Edomskis, Pim P
van der Bogt, Ruben D
Kleinrensink, Gert-Jan
Bemelman, Willem A
Lange, Johan F
author_facet Lambrichts, Daniël PV
Edomskis, Pim P
van der Bogt, Ruben D
Kleinrensink, Gert-Jan
Bemelman, Willem A
Lange, Johan F
author_sort Lambrichts, Daniël PV
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The optimal surgical approach for perforated diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis (Hinchey grade III or IV) remains debated. In recent years, accumulating evidence comparing sigmoid resection with primary anastomosis (PA) with the Hartmann’s procedure (HP) was presented. Therefore, the aim was to provide an updated and extensive synthesis of the available evidence. METHODS: A systematic search in Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases was performed. Studies comparing PA to HP for adult patients with Hinchey III or IV diverticulitis were included. Data on mortality, morbidity, stoma reversal, and patient-reported and cost-related outcomes were extracted. Random effects models were used to pool data and estimate odds ratios (ORs). RESULTS: From a total of 1560 articles, four randomized controlled trials and ten observational studies were identified, reporting on 1066 Hinchey III/IV patients. Based on trial outcomes, PA was found to be favorable over HP in terms of stoma reversal rates (OR 2.62, 95% CI 1.29, 5.31) and reversal-related morbidity (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.16, 0.69). No differences in mortality (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.32, 2.19), morbidity (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.65, 1.51), and reintervention rates (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.39, 2.11) after the index procedure were demonstrated. Data on patient-reported and cost-related outcomes were scarce, as well as outcomes in PA patients with or without ileostomy construction and Hinchey IV patients. CONCLUSION: Although between-study heterogeneity needs to be taken into account, the present results indicate that primary anastomosis seems to be the preferred option over Hartmann’s procedure in selected patients with Hinchey III or IV diverticulitis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00384-020-03617-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7340681
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73406812020-07-09 Sigmoid resection with primary anastomosis versus the Hartmann’s procedure for perforated diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis Lambrichts, Daniël PV Edomskis, Pim P van der Bogt, Ruben D Kleinrensink, Gert-Jan Bemelman, Willem A Lange, Johan F Int J Colorectal Dis Review PURPOSE: The optimal surgical approach for perforated diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis (Hinchey grade III or IV) remains debated. In recent years, accumulating evidence comparing sigmoid resection with primary anastomosis (PA) with the Hartmann’s procedure (HP) was presented. Therefore, the aim was to provide an updated and extensive synthesis of the available evidence. METHODS: A systematic search in Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases was performed. Studies comparing PA to HP for adult patients with Hinchey III or IV diverticulitis were included. Data on mortality, morbidity, stoma reversal, and patient-reported and cost-related outcomes were extracted. Random effects models were used to pool data and estimate odds ratios (ORs). RESULTS: From a total of 1560 articles, four randomized controlled trials and ten observational studies were identified, reporting on 1066 Hinchey III/IV patients. Based on trial outcomes, PA was found to be favorable over HP in terms of stoma reversal rates (OR 2.62, 95% CI 1.29, 5.31) and reversal-related morbidity (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.16, 0.69). No differences in mortality (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.32, 2.19), morbidity (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.65, 1.51), and reintervention rates (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.39, 2.11) after the index procedure were demonstrated. Data on patient-reported and cost-related outcomes were scarce, as well as outcomes in PA patients with or without ileostomy construction and Hinchey IV patients. CONCLUSION: Although between-study heterogeneity needs to be taken into account, the present results indicate that primary anastomosis seems to be the preferred option over Hartmann’s procedure in selected patients with Hinchey III or IV diverticulitis. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s00384-020-03617-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-06-05 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7340681/ /pubmed/32504331 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-020-03617-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Review
Lambrichts, Daniël PV
Edomskis, Pim P
van der Bogt, Ruben D
Kleinrensink, Gert-Jan
Bemelman, Willem A
Lange, Johan F
Sigmoid resection with primary anastomosis versus the Hartmann’s procedure for perforated diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Sigmoid resection with primary anastomosis versus the Hartmann’s procedure for perforated diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Sigmoid resection with primary anastomosis versus the Hartmann’s procedure for perforated diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Sigmoid resection with primary anastomosis versus the Hartmann’s procedure for perforated diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Sigmoid resection with primary anastomosis versus the Hartmann’s procedure for perforated diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Sigmoid resection with primary anastomosis versus the Hartmann’s procedure for perforated diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort sigmoid resection with primary anastomosis versus the hartmann’s procedure for perforated diverticulitis with purulent or fecal peritonitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7340681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32504331
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00384-020-03617-8
work_keys_str_mv AT lambrichtsdanielpv sigmoidresectionwithprimaryanastomosisversusthehartmannsprocedureforperforateddiverticulitiswithpurulentorfecalperitonitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT edomskispimp sigmoidresectionwithprimaryanastomosisversusthehartmannsprocedureforperforateddiverticulitiswithpurulentorfecalperitonitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vanderbogtrubend sigmoidresectionwithprimaryanastomosisversusthehartmannsprocedureforperforateddiverticulitiswithpurulentorfecalperitonitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT kleinrensinkgertjan sigmoidresectionwithprimaryanastomosisversusthehartmannsprocedureforperforateddiverticulitiswithpurulentorfecalperitonitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT bemelmanwillema sigmoidresectionwithprimaryanastomosisversusthehartmannsprocedureforperforateddiverticulitiswithpurulentorfecalperitonitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT langejohanf sigmoidresectionwithprimaryanastomosisversusthehartmannsprocedureforperforateddiverticulitiswithpurulentorfecalperitonitisasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis