Cargando…

Low ligation has a lower anastomotic leakage rate after rectal cancer surgery

BACKGROUND: For laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery, the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) can be ligated at its origin from the aorta [high ligation (HL)] or distally to the origin of the left colic artery [low ligation (LL)]. Whether different ligation levels are related to different postoperative c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Jia-Nan, Liu, Zheng, Wang, Zhi-Jie, Zhao, Fu-Qiang, Wei, Fang-Ze, Mei, Shi-Wen, Shen, Hai-Yu, Li, Juan, Pei, Wei, Wang, Zheng, Yu, Jun, Liu, Qian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7340993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32699578
http://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v12.i6.632
_version_ 1783555140585783296
author Chen, Jia-Nan
Liu, Zheng
Wang, Zhi-Jie
Zhao, Fu-Qiang
Wei, Fang-Ze
Mei, Shi-Wen
Shen, Hai-Yu
Li, Juan
Pei, Wei
Wang, Zheng
Yu, Jun
Liu, Qian
author_facet Chen, Jia-Nan
Liu, Zheng
Wang, Zhi-Jie
Zhao, Fu-Qiang
Wei, Fang-Ze
Mei, Shi-Wen
Shen, Hai-Yu
Li, Juan
Pei, Wei
Wang, Zheng
Yu, Jun
Liu, Qian
author_sort Chen, Jia-Nan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: For laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery, the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) can be ligated at its origin from the aorta [high ligation (HL)] or distally to the origin of the left colic artery [low ligation (LL)]. Whether different ligation levels are related to different postoperative complications, operation time, and lymph node yield remains controversial. Therefore, we designed this study to determine the effects of different ligation levels in rectal cancer surgery. AIM: To investigate the operative results following HL and LL of the IMA in rectal cancer patients. METHODS: From January 2017 to July 2019, this retrospective cohort study collected information from 462 consecutive rectal cancer patients. According to the ligation level, 235 patients were assigned to the HL group while 227 patients were assigned to the LL group. Data regarding the clinical characteristics, surgical characteristics and complications, pathological outcomes and postoperative recovery were obtained and compared between the two groups. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the possible risk factors for anastomotic leakage (AL). RESULTS: Compared to the HL group, the LL group had a significantly lower AL rate, with 6 (2.8%) cases in the LL group and 24 (11.0%) cases in the HL group (P = 0.001). The HL group also had a higher diverting stoma rate (16.5% vs 7.5%, P = 0.003). A multivariate logistic regression analysis was subsequently performed to adjust for the confounding factors and confirmed that HL (OR = 3.599; 95%CI: 1.374-9.425; P = 0.009), tumor located below the peritoneal reflection (OR = 2.751; 95%CI: 0.772-3.985; P = 0.031) and age (≥ 65 years) (OR = 2.494; 95%CI: 1.080-5.760; P = 0.032) were risk factors for AL. There were no differences in terms of patient demographics, pathological outcomes, lymph nodes harvested, blood loss, hospital stay and urinary function (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: In rectal cancer surgery, LL should be the preferred method, as it has a lower AL and diverting stoma rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7340993
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73409932020-07-21 Low ligation has a lower anastomotic leakage rate after rectal cancer surgery Chen, Jia-Nan Liu, Zheng Wang, Zhi-Jie Zhao, Fu-Qiang Wei, Fang-Ze Mei, Shi-Wen Shen, Hai-Yu Li, Juan Pei, Wei Wang, Zheng Yu, Jun Liu, Qian World J Gastrointest Oncol Retrospective Cohort Study BACKGROUND: For laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery, the inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) can be ligated at its origin from the aorta [high ligation (HL)] or distally to the origin of the left colic artery [low ligation (LL)]. Whether different ligation levels are related to different postoperative complications, operation time, and lymph node yield remains controversial. Therefore, we designed this study to determine the effects of different ligation levels in rectal cancer surgery. AIM: To investigate the operative results following HL and LL of the IMA in rectal cancer patients. METHODS: From January 2017 to July 2019, this retrospective cohort study collected information from 462 consecutive rectal cancer patients. According to the ligation level, 235 patients were assigned to the HL group while 227 patients were assigned to the LL group. Data regarding the clinical characteristics, surgical characteristics and complications, pathological outcomes and postoperative recovery were obtained and compared between the two groups. A multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the possible risk factors for anastomotic leakage (AL). RESULTS: Compared to the HL group, the LL group had a significantly lower AL rate, with 6 (2.8%) cases in the LL group and 24 (11.0%) cases in the HL group (P = 0.001). The HL group also had a higher diverting stoma rate (16.5% vs 7.5%, P = 0.003). A multivariate logistic regression analysis was subsequently performed to adjust for the confounding factors and confirmed that HL (OR = 3.599; 95%CI: 1.374-9.425; P = 0.009), tumor located below the peritoneal reflection (OR = 2.751; 95%CI: 0.772-3.985; P = 0.031) and age (≥ 65 years) (OR = 2.494; 95%CI: 1.080-5.760; P = 0.032) were risk factors for AL. There were no differences in terms of patient demographics, pathological outcomes, lymph nodes harvested, blood loss, hospital stay and urinary function (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: In rectal cancer surgery, LL should be the preferred method, as it has a lower AL and diverting stoma rate. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2020-06-15 2020-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7340993/ /pubmed/32699578 http://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v12.i6.632 Text en ©The Author(s) 2020. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Retrospective Cohort Study
Chen, Jia-Nan
Liu, Zheng
Wang, Zhi-Jie
Zhao, Fu-Qiang
Wei, Fang-Ze
Mei, Shi-Wen
Shen, Hai-Yu
Li, Juan
Pei, Wei
Wang, Zheng
Yu, Jun
Liu, Qian
Low ligation has a lower anastomotic leakage rate after rectal cancer surgery
title Low ligation has a lower anastomotic leakage rate after rectal cancer surgery
title_full Low ligation has a lower anastomotic leakage rate after rectal cancer surgery
title_fullStr Low ligation has a lower anastomotic leakage rate after rectal cancer surgery
title_full_unstemmed Low ligation has a lower anastomotic leakage rate after rectal cancer surgery
title_short Low ligation has a lower anastomotic leakage rate after rectal cancer surgery
title_sort low ligation has a lower anastomotic leakage rate after rectal cancer surgery
topic Retrospective Cohort Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7340993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32699578
http://dx.doi.org/10.4251/wjgo.v12.i6.632
work_keys_str_mv AT chenjianan lowligationhasaloweranastomoticleakagerateafterrectalcancersurgery
AT liuzheng lowligationhasaloweranastomoticleakagerateafterrectalcancersurgery
AT wangzhijie lowligationhasaloweranastomoticleakagerateafterrectalcancersurgery
AT zhaofuqiang lowligationhasaloweranastomoticleakagerateafterrectalcancersurgery
AT weifangze lowligationhasaloweranastomoticleakagerateafterrectalcancersurgery
AT meishiwen lowligationhasaloweranastomoticleakagerateafterrectalcancersurgery
AT shenhaiyu lowligationhasaloweranastomoticleakagerateafterrectalcancersurgery
AT lijuan lowligationhasaloweranastomoticleakagerateafterrectalcancersurgery
AT peiwei lowligationhasaloweranastomoticleakagerateafterrectalcancersurgery
AT wangzheng lowligationhasaloweranastomoticleakagerateafterrectalcancersurgery
AT yujun lowligationhasaloweranastomoticleakagerateafterrectalcancersurgery
AT liuqian lowligationhasaloweranastomoticleakagerateafterrectalcancersurgery