Cargando…
Close communication and 2-clubs in corporate networks: Europe 2010
Corporate networks, as induced by interlocking directorates between corporations, provide structures of personal communication between their boards. This paper studies such networks using the framework of a previous paper by Laan et al. (Soc Netw Anal Min, 2016. doi:10.1007/s13278-016-0326-0) where...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Vienna
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7341109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32655707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13278-016-0345-x |
_version_ | 1783555164992438272 |
---|---|
author | Mokken, Robert J. Heemskerk, Eelke M. Laan, Steven |
author_facet | Mokken, Robert J. Heemskerk, Eelke M. Laan, Steven |
author_sort | Mokken, Robert J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Corporate networks, as induced by interlocking directorates between corporations, provide structures of personal communication between their boards. This paper studies such networks using the framework of a previous paper by Laan et al. (Soc Netw Anal Min, 2016. doi:10.1007/s13278-016-0326-0) where close communication is defined by sub-networks, so that each pair of nodes (boards of a corporation) are either neighbours or have at least one common neighbour. These correspond to sub-graphs of diameter at most 2, designated by us earlier as 2-clubs of three types (coteries, social circles and hamlets), and conform three levels of close communication in social networks. They are all contained within the disjoint boroughs of a network, supercommunities which envelope all close communication between nodes of a network. This framework is applied here to an analysis of corporate board interlocks between the top 300 European corporations 2010, using the data from an earlier study by one of us (Heemskerk in Econ Soc 42:74–101, 2013). While the results corroborate the main findings of the earlier studies, our approach also uncovers additional, thus far unrevealed patterns. A single dominant European borough with the Francophone network as its centre and that of Germany only regionally and internally connected. The UK business elite on the other hand is very present and prominent in this European structure of corporate close communication. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7341109 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Springer Vienna |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73411092020-07-09 Close communication and 2-clubs in corporate networks: Europe 2010 Mokken, Robert J. Heemskerk, Eelke M. Laan, Steven Soc Netw Anal Min Original Article Corporate networks, as induced by interlocking directorates between corporations, provide structures of personal communication between their boards. This paper studies such networks using the framework of a previous paper by Laan et al. (Soc Netw Anal Min, 2016. doi:10.1007/s13278-016-0326-0) where close communication is defined by sub-networks, so that each pair of nodes (boards of a corporation) are either neighbours or have at least one common neighbour. These correspond to sub-graphs of diameter at most 2, designated by us earlier as 2-clubs of three types (coteries, social circles and hamlets), and conform three levels of close communication in social networks. They are all contained within the disjoint boroughs of a network, supercommunities which envelope all close communication between nodes of a network. This framework is applied here to an analysis of corporate board interlocks between the top 300 European corporations 2010, using the data from an earlier study by one of us (Heemskerk in Econ Soc 42:74–101, 2013). While the results corroborate the main findings of the earlier studies, our approach also uncovers additional, thus far unrevealed patterns. A single dominant European borough with the Francophone network as its centre and that of Germany only regionally and internally connected. The UK business elite on the other hand is very present and prominent in this European structure of corporate close communication. Springer Vienna 2016-06-22 2016 /pmc/articles/PMC7341109/ /pubmed/32655707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13278-016-0345-x Text en © The Author(s) 2016 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mokken, Robert J. Heemskerk, Eelke M. Laan, Steven Close communication and 2-clubs in corporate networks: Europe 2010 |
title | Close communication and 2-clubs in corporate networks: Europe 2010 |
title_full | Close communication and 2-clubs in corporate networks: Europe 2010 |
title_fullStr | Close communication and 2-clubs in corporate networks: Europe 2010 |
title_full_unstemmed | Close communication and 2-clubs in corporate networks: Europe 2010 |
title_short | Close communication and 2-clubs in corporate networks: Europe 2010 |
title_sort | close communication and 2-clubs in corporate networks: europe 2010 |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7341109/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32655707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s13278-016-0345-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mokkenrobertj closecommunicationand2clubsincorporatenetworkseurope2010 AT heemskerkeelkem closecommunicationand2clubsincorporatenetworkseurope2010 AT laansteven closecommunicationand2clubsincorporatenetworkseurope2010 |