Cargando…

A Review of Enteric Methane Emission Measurement Techniques in Ruminants

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Enteric methane emissions from ruminants are a major contributor to atmospheric greenhouse gas accumulation in agricultural production systems, which may consequently contribute to climate change. Accurate measurement of methane production in ruminants is vital to develop robust nati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Yiguang, Nan, Xuemei, Yang, Liang, Zheng, Shanshan, Jiang, Linshu, Xiong, Benhai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7341254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32521767
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10061004
_version_ 1783555196611198976
author Zhao, Yiguang
Nan, Xuemei
Yang, Liang
Zheng, Shanshan
Jiang, Linshu
Xiong, Benhai
author_facet Zhao, Yiguang
Nan, Xuemei
Yang, Liang
Zheng, Shanshan
Jiang, Linshu
Xiong, Benhai
author_sort Zhao, Yiguang
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Enteric methane emissions from ruminants are a major contributor to atmospheric greenhouse gas accumulation in agricultural production systems, which may consequently contribute to climate change. Accurate measurement of methane production in ruminants is vital to develop robust national greenhouse gas emission inventories and to evaluate mitigation strategies of methane emissions. This review summarizes several common methane measurement techniques suitable for ruminant production and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of each method. There is not a perfect technique for all situations. The appropriate technique depends on the objectives and resources available. Sophisticated techniques such as respiration chambers, sulphur hexafluoride tracer and ventilated hood are usually highly accurate but labor and time intensive. Simplified techniques such as GreenFeed, sniffer method, facemask, laser methane detector and portable accumulation chamber may be less accurate but are rapid with a high throughput. In general, an understanding of measurement mechanisms and the advantages and disadvantages with an appreciation of animal behavior and welfare is necessary for all techniques. ABSTRACT: To identify relationships between animal, dietary and management factors and the resulting methane (CH(4)) emissions, and to identify potential mitigation strategies for CH(4) production, it is vital to develop reliable and accurate CH(4) measurement techniques. This review outlines various methods for measuring enteric CH(4) emissions from ruminants such as respiration chambers (RC), sulphur hexafluoride (SF(6)) tracer, GreenFeed, sniffer method, ventilated hood, facemask, laser CH(4) detector and portable accumulation chamber. The advantages and disadvantages of these techniques are discussed. In general, RC, SF(6) and ventilated hood are capable of 24 h continuous measurements for each individual animal, providing accurate reference methods used for research and inventory purposes. However, they require high labor input, animal training and are time consuming. In contrast, short-term measurement techniques (i.e., GreenFeed, sniffer method, facemask, laser CH(4) detector and portable accumulation chamber) contain additional variations in timing and frequency of measurements obtained relative to the 24 h feeding cycle. However, they are suitable for large-scale measurements under commercial conditions due to their simplicity and high throughput. Successful use of these techniques relies on optimal matching between the objectives of the studies and the mechanism of each method with consideration of animal behavior and welfare. This review can provide useful information in selecting suitable techniques for CH(4) emission measurement in ruminants.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7341254
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73412542020-07-14 A Review of Enteric Methane Emission Measurement Techniques in Ruminants Zhao, Yiguang Nan, Xuemei Yang, Liang Zheng, Shanshan Jiang, Linshu Xiong, Benhai Animals (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: Enteric methane emissions from ruminants are a major contributor to atmospheric greenhouse gas accumulation in agricultural production systems, which may consequently contribute to climate change. Accurate measurement of methane production in ruminants is vital to develop robust national greenhouse gas emission inventories and to evaluate mitigation strategies of methane emissions. This review summarizes several common methane measurement techniques suitable for ruminant production and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of each method. There is not a perfect technique for all situations. The appropriate technique depends on the objectives and resources available. Sophisticated techniques such as respiration chambers, sulphur hexafluoride tracer and ventilated hood are usually highly accurate but labor and time intensive. Simplified techniques such as GreenFeed, sniffer method, facemask, laser methane detector and portable accumulation chamber may be less accurate but are rapid with a high throughput. In general, an understanding of measurement mechanisms and the advantages and disadvantages with an appreciation of animal behavior and welfare is necessary for all techniques. ABSTRACT: To identify relationships between animal, dietary and management factors and the resulting methane (CH(4)) emissions, and to identify potential mitigation strategies for CH(4) production, it is vital to develop reliable and accurate CH(4) measurement techniques. This review outlines various methods for measuring enteric CH(4) emissions from ruminants such as respiration chambers (RC), sulphur hexafluoride (SF(6)) tracer, GreenFeed, sniffer method, ventilated hood, facemask, laser CH(4) detector and portable accumulation chamber. The advantages and disadvantages of these techniques are discussed. In general, RC, SF(6) and ventilated hood are capable of 24 h continuous measurements for each individual animal, providing accurate reference methods used for research and inventory purposes. However, they require high labor input, animal training and are time consuming. In contrast, short-term measurement techniques (i.e., GreenFeed, sniffer method, facemask, laser CH(4) detector and portable accumulation chamber) contain additional variations in timing and frequency of measurements obtained relative to the 24 h feeding cycle. However, they are suitable for large-scale measurements under commercial conditions due to their simplicity and high throughput. Successful use of these techniques relies on optimal matching between the objectives of the studies and the mechanism of each method with consideration of animal behavior and welfare. This review can provide useful information in selecting suitable techniques for CH(4) emission measurement in ruminants. MDPI 2020-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7341254/ /pubmed/32521767 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10061004 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Zhao, Yiguang
Nan, Xuemei
Yang, Liang
Zheng, Shanshan
Jiang, Linshu
Xiong, Benhai
A Review of Enteric Methane Emission Measurement Techniques in Ruminants
title A Review of Enteric Methane Emission Measurement Techniques in Ruminants
title_full A Review of Enteric Methane Emission Measurement Techniques in Ruminants
title_fullStr A Review of Enteric Methane Emission Measurement Techniques in Ruminants
title_full_unstemmed A Review of Enteric Methane Emission Measurement Techniques in Ruminants
title_short A Review of Enteric Methane Emission Measurement Techniques in Ruminants
title_sort review of enteric methane emission measurement techniques in ruminants
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7341254/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32521767
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10061004
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaoyiguang areviewofentericmethaneemissionmeasurementtechniquesinruminants
AT nanxuemei areviewofentericmethaneemissionmeasurementtechniquesinruminants
AT yangliang areviewofentericmethaneemissionmeasurementtechniquesinruminants
AT zhengshanshan areviewofentericmethaneemissionmeasurementtechniquesinruminants
AT jianglinshu areviewofentericmethaneemissionmeasurementtechniquesinruminants
AT xiongbenhai areviewofentericmethaneemissionmeasurementtechniquesinruminants
AT zhaoyiguang reviewofentericmethaneemissionmeasurementtechniquesinruminants
AT nanxuemei reviewofentericmethaneemissionmeasurementtechniquesinruminants
AT yangliang reviewofentericmethaneemissionmeasurementtechniquesinruminants
AT zhengshanshan reviewofentericmethaneemissionmeasurementtechniquesinruminants
AT jianglinshu reviewofentericmethaneemissionmeasurementtechniquesinruminants
AT xiongbenhai reviewofentericmethaneemissionmeasurementtechniquesinruminants