Cargando…
A Review of Enteric Methane Emission Measurement Techniques in Ruminants
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Enteric methane emissions from ruminants are a major contributor to atmospheric greenhouse gas accumulation in agricultural production systems, which may consequently contribute to climate change. Accurate measurement of methane production in ruminants is vital to develop robust nati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7341254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32521767 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10061004 |
_version_ | 1783555196611198976 |
---|---|
author | Zhao, Yiguang Nan, Xuemei Yang, Liang Zheng, Shanshan Jiang, Linshu Xiong, Benhai |
author_facet | Zhao, Yiguang Nan, Xuemei Yang, Liang Zheng, Shanshan Jiang, Linshu Xiong, Benhai |
author_sort | Zhao, Yiguang |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Enteric methane emissions from ruminants are a major contributor to atmospheric greenhouse gas accumulation in agricultural production systems, which may consequently contribute to climate change. Accurate measurement of methane production in ruminants is vital to develop robust national greenhouse gas emission inventories and to evaluate mitigation strategies of methane emissions. This review summarizes several common methane measurement techniques suitable for ruminant production and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of each method. There is not a perfect technique for all situations. The appropriate technique depends on the objectives and resources available. Sophisticated techniques such as respiration chambers, sulphur hexafluoride tracer and ventilated hood are usually highly accurate but labor and time intensive. Simplified techniques such as GreenFeed, sniffer method, facemask, laser methane detector and portable accumulation chamber may be less accurate but are rapid with a high throughput. In general, an understanding of measurement mechanisms and the advantages and disadvantages with an appreciation of animal behavior and welfare is necessary for all techniques. ABSTRACT: To identify relationships between animal, dietary and management factors and the resulting methane (CH(4)) emissions, and to identify potential mitigation strategies for CH(4) production, it is vital to develop reliable and accurate CH(4) measurement techniques. This review outlines various methods for measuring enteric CH(4) emissions from ruminants such as respiration chambers (RC), sulphur hexafluoride (SF(6)) tracer, GreenFeed, sniffer method, ventilated hood, facemask, laser CH(4) detector and portable accumulation chamber. The advantages and disadvantages of these techniques are discussed. In general, RC, SF(6) and ventilated hood are capable of 24 h continuous measurements for each individual animal, providing accurate reference methods used for research and inventory purposes. However, they require high labor input, animal training and are time consuming. In contrast, short-term measurement techniques (i.e., GreenFeed, sniffer method, facemask, laser CH(4) detector and portable accumulation chamber) contain additional variations in timing and frequency of measurements obtained relative to the 24 h feeding cycle. However, they are suitable for large-scale measurements under commercial conditions due to their simplicity and high throughput. Successful use of these techniques relies on optimal matching between the objectives of the studies and the mechanism of each method with consideration of animal behavior and welfare. This review can provide useful information in selecting suitable techniques for CH(4) emission measurement in ruminants. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7341254 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73412542020-07-14 A Review of Enteric Methane Emission Measurement Techniques in Ruminants Zhao, Yiguang Nan, Xuemei Yang, Liang Zheng, Shanshan Jiang, Linshu Xiong, Benhai Animals (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: Enteric methane emissions from ruminants are a major contributor to atmospheric greenhouse gas accumulation in agricultural production systems, which may consequently contribute to climate change. Accurate measurement of methane production in ruminants is vital to develop robust national greenhouse gas emission inventories and to evaluate mitigation strategies of methane emissions. This review summarizes several common methane measurement techniques suitable for ruminant production and discusses the advantages and disadvantages of each method. There is not a perfect technique for all situations. The appropriate technique depends on the objectives and resources available. Sophisticated techniques such as respiration chambers, sulphur hexafluoride tracer and ventilated hood are usually highly accurate but labor and time intensive. Simplified techniques such as GreenFeed, sniffer method, facemask, laser methane detector and portable accumulation chamber may be less accurate but are rapid with a high throughput. In general, an understanding of measurement mechanisms and the advantages and disadvantages with an appreciation of animal behavior and welfare is necessary for all techniques. ABSTRACT: To identify relationships between animal, dietary and management factors and the resulting methane (CH(4)) emissions, and to identify potential mitigation strategies for CH(4) production, it is vital to develop reliable and accurate CH(4) measurement techniques. This review outlines various methods for measuring enteric CH(4) emissions from ruminants such as respiration chambers (RC), sulphur hexafluoride (SF(6)) tracer, GreenFeed, sniffer method, ventilated hood, facemask, laser CH(4) detector and portable accumulation chamber. The advantages and disadvantages of these techniques are discussed. In general, RC, SF(6) and ventilated hood are capable of 24 h continuous measurements for each individual animal, providing accurate reference methods used for research and inventory purposes. However, they require high labor input, animal training and are time consuming. In contrast, short-term measurement techniques (i.e., GreenFeed, sniffer method, facemask, laser CH(4) detector and portable accumulation chamber) contain additional variations in timing and frequency of measurements obtained relative to the 24 h feeding cycle. However, they are suitable for large-scale measurements under commercial conditions due to their simplicity and high throughput. Successful use of these techniques relies on optimal matching between the objectives of the studies and the mechanism of each method with consideration of animal behavior and welfare. This review can provide useful information in selecting suitable techniques for CH(4) emission measurement in ruminants. MDPI 2020-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7341254/ /pubmed/32521767 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10061004 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Zhao, Yiguang Nan, Xuemei Yang, Liang Zheng, Shanshan Jiang, Linshu Xiong, Benhai A Review of Enteric Methane Emission Measurement Techniques in Ruminants |
title | A Review of Enteric Methane Emission Measurement Techniques in Ruminants |
title_full | A Review of Enteric Methane Emission Measurement Techniques in Ruminants |
title_fullStr | A Review of Enteric Methane Emission Measurement Techniques in Ruminants |
title_full_unstemmed | A Review of Enteric Methane Emission Measurement Techniques in Ruminants |
title_short | A Review of Enteric Methane Emission Measurement Techniques in Ruminants |
title_sort | review of enteric methane emission measurement techniques in ruminants |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7341254/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32521767 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani10061004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhaoyiguang areviewofentericmethaneemissionmeasurementtechniquesinruminants AT nanxuemei areviewofentericmethaneemissionmeasurementtechniquesinruminants AT yangliang areviewofentericmethaneemissionmeasurementtechniquesinruminants AT zhengshanshan areviewofentericmethaneemissionmeasurementtechniquesinruminants AT jianglinshu areviewofentericmethaneemissionmeasurementtechniquesinruminants AT xiongbenhai areviewofentericmethaneemissionmeasurementtechniquesinruminants AT zhaoyiguang reviewofentericmethaneemissionmeasurementtechniquesinruminants AT nanxuemei reviewofentericmethaneemissionmeasurementtechniquesinruminants AT yangliang reviewofentericmethaneemissionmeasurementtechniquesinruminants AT zhengshanshan reviewofentericmethaneemissionmeasurementtechniquesinruminants AT jianglinshu reviewofentericmethaneemissionmeasurementtechniquesinruminants AT xiongbenhai reviewofentericmethaneemissionmeasurementtechniquesinruminants |