Cargando…

Towards a better estimation of prevalence of female genital mutilation in the European Union: a situation analysis

BACKGROUND: Female genital mutilation (FGM) is a harmful cultural practice that is predominantly documented in Africa, but also occurs in other parts of the world. Due to migration, women who have undergone FGM can also be found in the European Union (EU). Due to a lack of systematic representative...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: De Schrijver, L., Van Baelen, L., Van Eekert, N., Leye, E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7341583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32641062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-00947-2
_version_ 1783555268058021888
author De Schrijver, L.
Van Baelen, L.
Van Eekert, N.
Leye, E.
author_facet De Schrijver, L.
Van Baelen, L.
Van Eekert, N.
Leye, E.
author_sort De Schrijver, L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Female genital mutilation (FGM) is a harmful cultural practice that is predominantly documented in Africa, but also occurs in other parts of the world. Due to migration, women who have undergone FGM can also be found in the European Union (EU). Due to a lack of systematic representative surveys on the topic in EU, the prevalence of FGM and the number of women and children subjected to the practice remains unknown. However, information on the magnitude of the problem in the EU is necessary for policy makers to design and track preventive measures and to determine resource allocation. METHODS: Between March 2015 and May 2015, we performed a situation analysis consisting of a critical interpretive synthesis and SWOT-analysis of available at the time peer reviewed and grey literature document on national prevalence studies on FGM in the EU. Studies estimating the prevalence of FGM and the number of girls and women subjected to the practice in the EU were mapped to analyse their methodologies and identify their Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT). Distinction was made between direct and indirect estimation methods. RESULTS: Thirteen publications matched the prioritized inclusion criteria. The situation analysis showed that both direct and indirect methodologies were used to estimate FGM prevalence and the number of girls and women subjected to FGM in the EU. The SWOT-analysis indicated that due to the large variations in the targeted population and the available secondary information in EU Member States, one single estimation method is not applicable in all Member States. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest a twofold method for estimating the number of girls and women who have undergone fgm in the EU. For countries with a low expected prevalence of women who have undergone fgm, the indirect method will provide a good enough estimation of the FGM prevalence. The extrapolation-of-fgm-countries-prevalence-data-method, based on the documented FGM prevalence numbers in DHS and MICS surveys, can be used for indirect estimations of girls and women subjected to FGM in the eu. For countries with a high expected prevalence of FGM in the EU Member State, we recommend to combine both a direct estimation method (e.g. in the form of a survey conducted in the target population) and an indirect estimation method and to use a sample design as developed by the FGM-PREV project. The choice for a direct or indirect method will ultimately depend on available financial means and the purpose for the estimation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7341583
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73415832020-07-14 Towards a better estimation of prevalence of female genital mutilation in the European Union: a situation analysis De Schrijver, L. Van Baelen, L. Van Eekert, N. Leye, E. Reprod Health Review BACKGROUND: Female genital mutilation (FGM) is a harmful cultural practice that is predominantly documented in Africa, but also occurs in other parts of the world. Due to migration, women who have undergone FGM can also be found in the European Union (EU). Due to a lack of systematic representative surveys on the topic in EU, the prevalence of FGM and the number of women and children subjected to the practice remains unknown. However, information on the magnitude of the problem in the EU is necessary for policy makers to design and track preventive measures and to determine resource allocation. METHODS: Between March 2015 and May 2015, we performed a situation analysis consisting of a critical interpretive synthesis and SWOT-analysis of available at the time peer reviewed and grey literature document on national prevalence studies on FGM in the EU. Studies estimating the prevalence of FGM and the number of girls and women subjected to the practice in the EU were mapped to analyse their methodologies and identify their Strengths, Weakness, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT). Distinction was made between direct and indirect estimation methods. RESULTS: Thirteen publications matched the prioritized inclusion criteria. The situation analysis showed that both direct and indirect methodologies were used to estimate FGM prevalence and the number of girls and women subjected to FGM in the EU. The SWOT-analysis indicated that due to the large variations in the targeted population and the available secondary information in EU Member States, one single estimation method is not applicable in all Member States. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest a twofold method for estimating the number of girls and women who have undergone fgm in the EU. For countries with a low expected prevalence of women who have undergone fgm, the indirect method will provide a good enough estimation of the FGM prevalence. The extrapolation-of-fgm-countries-prevalence-data-method, based on the documented FGM prevalence numbers in DHS and MICS surveys, can be used for indirect estimations of girls and women subjected to FGM in the eu. For countries with a high expected prevalence of FGM in the EU Member State, we recommend to combine both a direct estimation method (e.g. in the form of a survey conducted in the target population) and an indirect estimation method and to use a sample design as developed by the FGM-PREV project. The choice for a direct or indirect method will ultimately depend on available financial means and the purpose for the estimation. BioMed Central 2020-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7341583/ /pubmed/32641062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-00947-2 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Review
De Schrijver, L.
Van Baelen, L.
Van Eekert, N.
Leye, E.
Towards a better estimation of prevalence of female genital mutilation in the European Union: a situation analysis
title Towards a better estimation of prevalence of female genital mutilation in the European Union: a situation analysis
title_full Towards a better estimation of prevalence of female genital mutilation in the European Union: a situation analysis
title_fullStr Towards a better estimation of prevalence of female genital mutilation in the European Union: a situation analysis
title_full_unstemmed Towards a better estimation of prevalence of female genital mutilation in the European Union: a situation analysis
title_short Towards a better estimation of prevalence of female genital mutilation in the European Union: a situation analysis
title_sort towards a better estimation of prevalence of female genital mutilation in the european union: a situation analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7341583/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32641062
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-020-00947-2
work_keys_str_mv AT deschrijverl towardsabetterestimationofprevalenceoffemalegenitalmutilationintheeuropeanunionasituationanalysis
AT vanbaelenl towardsabetterestimationofprevalenceoffemalegenitalmutilationintheeuropeanunionasituationanalysis
AT vaneekertn towardsabetterestimationofprevalenceoffemalegenitalmutilationintheeuropeanunionasituationanalysis
AT leyee towardsabetterestimationofprevalenceoffemalegenitalmutilationintheeuropeanunionasituationanalysis