Cargando…
When accountability meets power: realizing sexual and reproductive health and rights
This paper addresses a critical concern in realizing sexual and reproductive health and rights through policies and programs – the relationship between power and accountability. We examine accountability strategies for sexual and reproductive health and rights through the lens of power so that we mi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7341588/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32635915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-01221-4 |
_version_ | 1783555269224038400 |
---|---|
author | Sen, Gita Iyer, Aditi Chattopadhyay, Sreeparna Khosla, Rajat |
author_facet | Sen, Gita Iyer, Aditi Chattopadhyay, Sreeparna Khosla, Rajat |
author_sort | Sen, Gita |
collection | PubMed |
description | This paper addresses a critical concern in realizing sexual and reproductive health and rights through policies and programs – the relationship between power and accountability. We examine accountability strategies for sexual and reproductive health and rights through the lens of power so that we might better understand and assess their actual working. Power often derives from deep structural inequalities, but also seeps into norms and beliefs, into what we ‘know’ as truth, and what we believe about the world and about ourselves within it. Power legitimizes hierarchy and authority, and manufactures consent. Its capillary action causes it to spread into every corner and social extremity, but also sets up the possibility of challenge and contestation. Using illustrative examples, we show that in some contexts accountability strategies may confront and transform adverse power relationships. In other contexts, power relations may be more resistant to change, giving rise to contestation, accommodation, negotiation or even subversion of the goals of accountability strategies. This raises an important question about measurement. How is one to assess the achievements of accountability strategies, given the shifting sands on which they are implemented? We argue that power-focused realist evaluations are needed that address four sets of questions about: i) the dimensions and sources of power that an accountability strategy confronts; ii) how power is built into the artefacts of the strategy – its objectives, rules, procedures, financing methods inter alia; iii) what incentives, disincentives and norms for behavior are set up by the interplay of the above; and iv) their consequences for the outcomes of the accountability strategy. We illustrate this approach through examples of performance, social and legal accountability strategies. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7341588 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73415882020-07-14 When accountability meets power: realizing sexual and reproductive health and rights Sen, Gita Iyer, Aditi Chattopadhyay, Sreeparna Khosla, Rajat Int J Equity Health Research This paper addresses a critical concern in realizing sexual and reproductive health and rights through policies and programs – the relationship between power and accountability. We examine accountability strategies for sexual and reproductive health and rights through the lens of power so that we might better understand and assess their actual working. Power often derives from deep structural inequalities, but also seeps into norms and beliefs, into what we ‘know’ as truth, and what we believe about the world and about ourselves within it. Power legitimizes hierarchy and authority, and manufactures consent. Its capillary action causes it to spread into every corner and social extremity, but also sets up the possibility of challenge and contestation. Using illustrative examples, we show that in some contexts accountability strategies may confront and transform adverse power relationships. In other contexts, power relations may be more resistant to change, giving rise to contestation, accommodation, negotiation or even subversion of the goals of accountability strategies. This raises an important question about measurement. How is one to assess the achievements of accountability strategies, given the shifting sands on which they are implemented? We argue that power-focused realist evaluations are needed that address four sets of questions about: i) the dimensions and sources of power that an accountability strategy confronts; ii) how power is built into the artefacts of the strategy – its objectives, rules, procedures, financing methods inter alia; iii) what incentives, disincentives and norms for behavior are set up by the interplay of the above; and iv) their consequences for the outcomes of the accountability strategy. We illustrate this approach through examples of performance, social and legal accountability strategies. BioMed Central 2020-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7341588/ /pubmed/32635915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-01221-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Sen, Gita Iyer, Aditi Chattopadhyay, Sreeparna Khosla, Rajat When accountability meets power: realizing sexual and reproductive health and rights |
title | When accountability meets power: realizing sexual and reproductive health and rights |
title_full | When accountability meets power: realizing sexual and reproductive health and rights |
title_fullStr | When accountability meets power: realizing sexual and reproductive health and rights |
title_full_unstemmed | When accountability meets power: realizing sexual and reproductive health and rights |
title_short | When accountability meets power: realizing sexual and reproductive health and rights |
title_sort | when accountability meets power: realizing sexual and reproductive health and rights |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7341588/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32635915 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12939-020-01221-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sengita whenaccountabilitymeetspowerrealizingsexualandreproductivehealthandrights AT iyeraditi whenaccountabilitymeetspowerrealizingsexualandreproductivehealthandrights AT chattopadhyaysreeparna whenaccountabilitymeetspowerrealizingsexualandreproductivehealthandrights AT khoslarajat whenaccountabilitymeetspowerrealizingsexualandreproductivehealthandrights |