Cargando…
Chemical signals from eggs facilitate cryptic female choice in humans
Mate choice can continue after mating via chemical communication between the female reproductive system and sperm. While there is a growing appreciation that females can bias sperm use and paternity by exerting cryptic female choice for preferred males, we know surprisingly little about the mechanis...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7341926/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32517615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.0805 |
_version_ | 1783555330339241984 |
---|---|
author | Fitzpatrick, John L. Willis, Charlotte Devigili, Alessandro Young, Amy Carroll, Michael Hunter, Helen R. Brison, Daniel R. |
author_facet | Fitzpatrick, John L. Willis, Charlotte Devigili, Alessandro Young, Amy Carroll, Michael Hunter, Helen R. Brison, Daniel R. |
author_sort | Fitzpatrick, John L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Mate choice can continue after mating via chemical communication between the female reproductive system and sperm. While there is a growing appreciation that females can bias sperm use and paternity by exerting cryptic female choice for preferred males, we know surprisingly little about the mechanisms underlying these post-mating choices. In particular, whether chemical signals released from eggs (chemoattractants) allow females to exert cryptic female choice to favour sperm from specific males remains an open question, particularly in species (including humans) where adults exercise pre-mating mate choice. Here, we adapt a classic dichotomous mate choice assay to the microscopic scale to assess gamete-mediated mate choice in humans. We examined how sperm respond to follicular fluid, a source of human sperm chemoattractants, from either their partner or a non-partner female when experiencing a simultaneous or non-simultaneous choice between follicular fluids. We report robust evidence under these two distinct experimental conditions that follicular fluid from different females consistently and differentially attracts sperm from specific males. This chemoattractant-moderated choice of sperm offers eggs an avenue to exercise independent mate preference. Indeed, gamete-mediated mate choice did not reinforce pre-mating human mate choice decisions. Our results demonstrate that chemoattractants facilitate gamete-mediated mate choice in humans, which offers females the opportunity to exert cryptic female choice for sperm from specific males. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7341926 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | The Royal Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73419262020-07-12 Chemical signals from eggs facilitate cryptic female choice in humans Fitzpatrick, John L. Willis, Charlotte Devigili, Alessandro Young, Amy Carroll, Michael Hunter, Helen R. Brison, Daniel R. Proc Biol Sci Evolution Mate choice can continue after mating via chemical communication between the female reproductive system and sperm. While there is a growing appreciation that females can bias sperm use and paternity by exerting cryptic female choice for preferred males, we know surprisingly little about the mechanisms underlying these post-mating choices. In particular, whether chemical signals released from eggs (chemoattractants) allow females to exert cryptic female choice to favour sperm from specific males remains an open question, particularly in species (including humans) where adults exercise pre-mating mate choice. Here, we adapt a classic dichotomous mate choice assay to the microscopic scale to assess gamete-mediated mate choice in humans. We examined how sperm respond to follicular fluid, a source of human sperm chemoattractants, from either their partner or a non-partner female when experiencing a simultaneous or non-simultaneous choice between follicular fluids. We report robust evidence under these two distinct experimental conditions that follicular fluid from different females consistently and differentially attracts sperm from specific males. This chemoattractant-moderated choice of sperm offers eggs an avenue to exercise independent mate preference. Indeed, gamete-mediated mate choice did not reinforce pre-mating human mate choice decisions. Our results demonstrate that chemoattractants facilitate gamete-mediated mate choice in humans, which offers females the opportunity to exert cryptic female choice for sperm from specific males. The Royal Society 2020-06-10 2020-06-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7341926/ /pubmed/32517615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.0805 Text en © 2020 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Evolution Fitzpatrick, John L. Willis, Charlotte Devigili, Alessandro Young, Amy Carroll, Michael Hunter, Helen R. Brison, Daniel R. Chemical signals from eggs facilitate cryptic female choice in humans |
title | Chemical signals from eggs facilitate cryptic female choice in humans |
title_full | Chemical signals from eggs facilitate cryptic female choice in humans |
title_fullStr | Chemical signals from eggs facilitate cryptic female choice in humans |
title_full_unstemmed | Chemical signals from eggs facilitate cryptic female choice in humans |
title_short | Chemical signals from eggs facilitate cryptic female choice in humans |
title_sort | chemical signals from eggs facilitate cryptic female choice in humans |
topic | Evolution |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7341926/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32517615 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.0805 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fitzpatrickjohnl chemicalsignalsfromeggsfacilitatecrypticfemalechoiceinhumans AT willischarlotte chemicalsignalsfromeggsfacilitatecrypticfemalechoiceinhumans AT devigilialessandro chemicalsignalsfromeggsfacilitatecrypticfemalechoiceinhumans AT youngamy chemicalsignalsfromeggsfacilitatecrypticfemalechoiceinhumans AT carrollmichael chemicalsignalsfromeggsfacilitatecrypticfemalechoiceinhumans AT hunterhelenr chemicalsignalsfromeggsfacilitatecrypticfemalechoiceinhumans AT brisondanielr chemicalsignalsfromeggsfacilitatecrypticfemalechoiceinhumans |