Cargando…

自体与无关供者造血干细胞移植治疗首次缓解期成人原发性急性髓系白血病的疗效比较

OBJECTIVE: To compare differences of autologous and unrelated donor stem cell transplantation(auto-HSCT and URD-HSCT)for adults with primary acute myeloid leukemia(AML)in first complete remission(CR(1))from a single center and to investigate the appropriate patients for the 2 types of transplant. ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7342061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32536132
http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2020.05.002
_version_ 1783555355391819776
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare differences of autologous and unrelated donor stem cell transplantation(auto-HSCT and URD-HSCT)for adults with primary acute myeloid leukemia(AML)in first complete remission(CR(1))from a single center and to investigate the appropriate patients for the 2 types of transplant. METHODS: In this retrospective investigation, we studied adults with primary AML who received auto-HSCT and URD-HSCT from March 2008 to November 2018. Overall survival(OS), leukemia-freesurvival(LFS), relapse, transplant-relatedmortality(TRM), andhematopoietic reconstitution were compared along with the prognostic value of cytogenetics. RESULTS: A total of 147 adult patients were enrolled in this study(n=87 for auto-HSCT and n=60 for URD-HSCT). Baseline characteristics were comparable between the 2 groups. The accumulative neutrophil engraftment rate at+30 days was not statistically different between the 2 groups[92.6%(95% CI 86.9%–98.3%)vs 98.3%(95% CI 95.0%–100.0%), P=0.270], whereas the accumulative platelet engraftment rate at+60 days was significantly lower in the auto-HSCT group[83.6%(95% CI 75.8%–91.4%)vs 93.3%(95% CI 87.0%–99.6%), P<0.001]. In patients undergoing URD-HSCT, the accumulative incidences of acute GVHD(aGVHD)and gradeⅡ–ⅣaGVHD were 56.7%(95% CI 43.0%–68.2%)and 16.7%(95% CI 8.5%–27.2%), and the incidences of chronic GVHD(cGVHD)and extensive cGVHD were 33.3%(95% CI 21.7%–45.4%)and 15.0%(95% CI 7.3%–25.2%), respectively. After a median follow-up of 53.8(0.8–127.8)months, patients in the 2 groups demonstrated comparable OS and LFS at 5 years after transplant[71.7%(95% CI 61.7%–81.7%)vs 67.8%(95% CI 55.8%–79.8%), P=0.556;64.6%(95% CI 54.4%–74.8%)vs 68.1%(95% CI 56.3%–79.9%), P=0.642]. Patients in the auto-HSCT group showed significantly higher incidence of relapse at 5 years after transplant[31.9%(95% CI 22.2%–42.1%)vs 15.1%(95% CI 7.4%–25.6%), P=0.015]and significantly lower incidence of TRM[3.4%(95% CI 0.9%–8.9%)vs 16.7%(95% CI 8.5%–27.2%), P=0.006]compared with the URD group. HLA mismatching had no effects on the incidences of hematopoietic reconstitution, GVHD, OS, LFS, relapse, and TRM. Patients of cytogenetically favorable and intermediate risk demonstrated comparable OS and LFS after auto-HSCT and URD-HSCT, while patients of poor risk had significantly higher relapse and lower LFS after auto-HSCT. CONCLUSION: In this study, adults with primary AML in CR(1)demonstrated relatively higher relapse but lower TRM after auto-HSCT, resulting in comparable survival to that of URD-HSCT. In the absence of matched sibling donors, patients of cytogenetically poor risk should receive URD-HSCT in order to achieve lower relapse and better survival.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7342061
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73420612020-07-16 自体与无关供者造血干细胞移植治疗首次缓解期成人原发性急性髓系白血病的疗效比较 Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 论著 OBJECTIVE: To compare differences of autologous and unrelated donor stem cell transplantation(auto-HSCT and URD-HSCT)for adults with primary acute myeloid leukemia(AML)in first complete remission(CR(1))from a single center and to investigate the appropriate patients for the 2 types of transplant. METHODS: In this retrospective investigation, we studied adults with primary AML who received auto-HSCT and URD-HSCT from March 2008 to November 2018. Overall survival(OS), leukemia-freesurvival(LFS), relapse, transplant-relatedmortality(TRM), andhematopoietic reconstitution were compared along with the prognostic value of cytogenetics. RESULTS: A total of 147 adult patients were enrolled in this study(n=87 for auto-HSCT and n=60 for URD-HSCT). Baseline characteristics were comparable between the 2 groups. The accumulative neutrophil engraftment rate at+30 days was not statistically different between the 2 groups[92.6%(95% CI 86.9%–98.3%)vs 98.3%(95% CI 95.0%–100.0%), P=0.270], whereas the accumulative platelet engraftment rate at+60 days was significantly lower in the auto-HSCT group[83.6%(95% CI 75.8%–91.4%)vs 93.3%(95% CI 87.0%–99.6%), P<0.001]. In patients undergoing URD-HSCT, the accumulative incidences of acute GVHD(aGVHD)and gradeⅡ–ⅣaGVHD were 56.7%(95% CI 43.0%–68.2%)and 16.7%(95% CI 8.5%–27.2%), and the incidences of chronic GVHD(cGVHD)and extensive cGVHD were 33.3%(95% CI 21.7%–45.4%)and 15.0%(95% CI 7.3%–25.2%), respectively. After a median follow-up of 53.8(0.8–127.8)months, patients in the 2 groups demonstrated comparable OS and LFS at 5 years after transplant[71.7%(95% CI 61.7%–81.7%)vs 67.8%(95% CI 55.8%–79.8%), P=0.556;64.6%(95% CI 54.4%–74.8%)vs 68.1%(95% CI 56.3%–79.9%), P=0.642]. Patients in the auto-HSCT group showed significantly higher incidence of relapse at 5 years after transplant[31.9%(95% CI 22.2%–42.1%)vs 15.1%(95% CI 7.4%–25.6%), P=0.015]and significantly lower incidence of TRM[3.4%(95% CI 0.9%–8.9%)vs 16.7%(95% CI 8.5%–27.2%), P=0.006]compared with the URD group. HLA mismatching had no effects on the incidences of hematopoietic reconstitution, GVHD, OS, LFS, relapse, and TRM. Patients of cytogenetically favorable and intermediate risk demonstrated comparable OS and LFS after auto-HSCT and URD-HSCT, while patients of poor risk had significantly higher relapse and lower LFS after auto-HSCT. CONCLUSION: In this study, adults with primary AML in CR(1)demonstrated relatively higher relapse but lower TRM after auto-HSCT, resulting in comparable survival to that of URD-HSCT. In the absence of matched sibling donors, patients of cytogenetically poor risk should receive URD-HSCT in order to achieve lower relapse and better survival. Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7342061/ /pubmed/32536132 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2020.05.002 Text en 2020年版权归中华医学会所有 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (CC-BY-NC). The Copyright own by Publisher. Without authorization, shall not reprint, except this publication article, shall not use this publication format design. Unless otherwise stated, all articles published in this journal do not represent the views of the Chinese Medical Association or the editorial board of this journal.
spellingShingle 论著
自体与无关供者造血干细胞移植治疗首次缓解期成人原发性急性髓系白血病的疗效比较
title 自体与无关供者造血干细胞移植治疗首次缓解期成人原发性急性髓系白血病的疗效比较
title_full 自体与无关供者造血干细胞移植治疗首次缓解期成人原发性急性髓系白血病的疗效比较
title_fullStr 自体与无关供者造血干细胞移植治疗首次缓解期成人原发性急性髓系白血病的疗效比较
title_full_unstemmed 自体与无关供者造血干细胞移植治疗首次缓解期成人原发性急性髓系白血病的疗效比较
title_short 自体与无关供者造血干细胞移植治疗首次缓解期成人原发性急性髓系白血病的疗效比较
title_sort 自体与无关供者造血干细胞移植治疗首次缓解期成人原发性急性髓系白血病的疗效比较
topic 论著
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7342061/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32536132
http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2020.05.002
work_keys_str_mv AT zìtǐyǔwúguāngōngzhězàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáoshǒucìhuǎnjiěqīchéngrényuánfāxìngjíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT zìtǐyǔwúguāngōngzhězàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáoshǒucìhuǎnjiěqīchéngrényuánfāxìngjíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT zìtǐyǔwúguāngōngzhězàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáoshǒucìhuǎnjiěqīchéngrényuánfāxìngjíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT zìtǐyǔwúguāngōngzhězàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáoshǒucìhuǎnjiěqīchéngrényuánfāxìngjíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT zìtǐyǔwúguāngōngzhězàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáoshǒucìhuǎnjiěqīchéngrényuánfāxìngjíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT zìtǐyǔwúguāngōngzhězàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáoshǒucìhuǎnjiěqīchéngrényuánfāxìngjíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT zìtǐyǔwúguāngōngzhězàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáoshǒucìhuǎnjiěqīchéngrényuánfāxìngjíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT zìtǐyǔwúguāngōngzhězàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáoshǒucìhuǎnjiěqīchéngrényuánfāxìngjíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT zìtǐyǔwúguāngōngzhězàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáoshǒucìhuǎnjiěqīchéngrényuánfāxìngjíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT zìtǐyǔwúguāngōngzhězàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáoshǒucìhuǎnjiěqīchéngrényuánfāxìngjíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàobǐjiào