Cargando…

自体与同胞全相合造血干细胞移植治疗PH(+)急性淋巴细胞白血病的疗效比较

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of autologous HSCT(auto-HSCT)with matched sibling donor(MSD)HSCT in Ph(+) ALL and provide a basis for the choice of transplantation method. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated the outcomes of 78 adult patients with Ph(+) ALL who underwent auto-HSCT(n=31)and MS...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7342073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32536133
http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2020.05.003
_version_ 1783555359963611136
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of autologous HSCT(auto-HSCT)with matched sibling donor(MSD)HSCT in Ph(+) ALL and provide a basis for the choice of transplantation method. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated the outcomes of 78 adult patients with Ph(+) ALL who underwent auto-HSCT(n=31)and MSD-HSCT(n=47)in Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, CAMS & PUMC, from January 2008 to December 2017. The overall survival(OS)rate, leukemia-free survival(LFS)rate, cumulative incidence of relapse(CIR)rate, nonrelapse mortality(NRM)rate, and the impact of achievement of complete molecular response(CMR)within 3 months and sustaining CMR up to transplantation(s3CMR)on transplantation method were explored. RESULTS: The median time of neutrophil and platelet reconstitution in auto-HSCT and MSD-HSCT groups were 12(10–29)days vs 14(11–24)days(P=0.006)and 17.5(10–62)days vs 7(10–33)days(P=0.794), respectively. In the MSD-HSCT group, the incidence of Ⅱ–Ⅳ and Ⅲ–Ⅳ acute graft-versus-host disease(GVHD)was 27.7%(13/47)and 8.5%(4/47), respectively. The incidence of limited and extensive chronic GVHD was 17.0%(8/47)and 12.8%(6/47), respectively. The estimated CIR, NRM, LFS, and OS at 3 years were not significantly different between auto-HSCT and MSD-HSCT groups(P>0.05). For 44 patients who achieved s3CMR, 3-year OS[(84.0±8.6)% vs(78.0±8.7)%, P=0.612], LFS[(70.3±10.3)% vs(68.2±10.1)%, P=0.970], CIR[(24.9±10.0)% vs(14.4±8.0)%, P=0.286], and NRM[(4.7±4.7)% vs(17.4±8.1)%, P=0.209]of the auto-HSCT and MSD-HSCT groups were not significantly different. However, for 34 patients who did not reach s3CMR, 3-year cumulative relapse rate of patients in the auto-HSCT group was significantly higher than MSD-HSCT group[(80.0±14.7)% vs(39.6±10.9)%, P=0.057]. CONCLUSION: auto-HSCT with maintenance therapy after HSCT appears to be an attractive treatment option for patients with Ph(+) ALL especially for those with s3CMR maintained up to transplantation. For non-s3CMR patients, allogeneic transplantation may be more effective from lower relapse.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7342073
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73420732020-07-16 自体与同胞全相合造血干细胞移植治疗PH(+)急性淋巴细胞白血病的疗效比较 Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 论著 OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of autologous HSCT(auto-HSCT)with matched sibling donor(MSD)HSCT in Ph(+) ALL and provide a basis for the choice of transplantation method. METHODS: We retrospectively investigated the outcomes of 78 adult patients with Ph(+) ALL who underwent auto-HSCT(n=31)and MSD-HSCT(n=47)in Institute of Hematology and Blood Diseases Hospital, CAMS & PUMC, from January 2008 to December 2017. The overall survival(OS)rate, leukemia-free survival(LFS)rate, cumulative incidence of relapse(CIR)rate, nonrelapse mortality(NRM)rate, and the impact of achievement of complete molecular response(CMR)within 3 months and sustaining CMR up to transplantation(s3CMR)on transplantation method were explored. RESULTS: The median time of neutrophil and platelet reconstitution in auto-HSCT and MSD-HSCT groups were 12(10–29)days vs 14(11–24)days(P=0.006)and 17.5(10–62)days vs 7(10–33)days(P=0.794), respectively. In the MSD-HSCT group, the incidence of Ⅱ–Ⅳ and Ⅲ–Ⅳ acute graft-versus-host disease(GVHD)was 27.7%(13/47)and 8.5%(4/47), respectively. The incidence of limited and extensive chronic GVHD was 17.0%(8/47)and 12.8%(6/47), respectively. The estimated CIR, NRM, LFS, and OS at 3 years were not significantly different between auto-HSCT and MSD-HSCT groups(P>0.05). For 44 patients who achieved s3CMR, 3-year OS[(84.0±8.6)% vs(78.0±8.7)%, P=0.612], LFS[(70.3±10.3)% vs(68.2±10.1)%, P=0.970], CIR[(24.9±10.0)% vs(14.4±8.0)%, P=0.286], and NRM[(4.7±4.7)% vs(17.4±8.1)%, P=0.209]of the auto-HSCT and MSD-HSCT groups were not significantly different. However, for 34 patients who did not reach s3CMR, 3-year cumulative relapse rate of patients in the auto-HSCT group was significantly higher than MSD-HSCT group[(80.0±14.7)% vs(39.6±10.9)%, P=0.057]. CONCLUSION: auto-HSCT with maintenance therapy after HSCT appears to be an attractive treatment option for patients with Ph(+) ALL especially for those with s3CMR maintained up to transplantation. For non-s3CMR patients, allogeneic transplantation may be more effective from lower relapse. Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology 2020-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7342073/ /pubmed/32536133 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2020.05.003 Text en 2020年版权归中华医学会所有 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (CC-BY-NC). The Copyright own by Publisher. Without authorization, shall not reprint, except this publication article, shall not use this publication format design. Unless otherwise stated, all articles published in this journal do not represent the views of the Chinese Medical Association or the editorial board of this journal.
spellingShingle 论著
自体与同胞全相合造血干细胞移植治疗PH(+)急性淋巴细胞白血病的疗效比较
title 自体与同胞全相合造血干细胞移植治疗PH(+)急性淋巴细胞白血病的疗效比较
title_full 自体与同胞全相合造血干细胞移植治疗PH(+)急性淋巴细胞白血病的疗效比较
title_fullStr 自体与同胞全相合造血干细胞移植治疗PH(+)急性淋巴细胞白血病的疗效比较
title_full_unstemmed 自体与同胞全相合造血干细胞移植治疗PH(+)急性淋巴细胞白血病的疗效比较
title_short 自体与同胞全相合造血干细胞移植治疗PH(+)急性淋巴细胞白血病的疗效比较
title_sort 自体与同胞全相合造血干细胞移植治疗ph(+)急性淋巴细胞白血病的疗效比较
topic 论著
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7342073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32536133
http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2020.05.003
work_keys_str_mv AT zìtǐyǔtóngbāoquánxiānghézàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáophjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT zìtǐyǔtóngbāoquánxiānghézàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáophjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT zìtǐyǔtóngbāoquánxiānghézàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáophjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT zìtǐyǔtóngbāoquánxiānghézàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáophjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT zìtǐyǔtóngbāoquánxiānghézàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáophjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT zìtǐyǔtóngbāoquánxiānghézàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáophjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT zìtǐyǔtóngbāoquánxiānghézàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáophjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT zìtǐyǔtóngbāoquánxiānghézàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáophjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT zìtǐyǔtóngbāoquánxiānghézàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáophjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT zìtǐyǔtóngbāoquánxiānghézàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáophjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT zìtǐyǔtóngbāoquánxiānghézàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáophjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT zìtǐyǔtóngbāoquánxiānghézàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáophjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT zìtǐyǔtóngbāoquánxiānghézàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáophjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàobǐjiào