Cargando…
亲缘半相合与无关供者造血干细胞移植治疗重型再生障碍性贫血的疗效比较
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of HLA-haploidentical donor hematopoietic transplantation (Haplo-HSCT) for severe aplastic anemia (SAA) by compared with the same period of unrelated donor transplantation (UD-HSCT). METHODS: Of a cohort of 50 SAA patients between September 2012 and July 2014, 26...
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7342309/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26876251 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2016.01.007 |
_version_ | 1783555441245028352 |
---|---|
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of HLA-haploidentical donor hematopoietic transplantation (Haplo-HSCT) for severe aplastic anemia (SAA) by compared with the same period of unrelated donor transplantation (UD-HSCT). METHODS: Of a cohort of 50 SAA patients between September 2012 and July 2014, 26 patients underwent UD-HSCT and 24 patients Haplo-HSCT. RESULTS: OS rate was 91.3% with a median follow-up of 9 (2–26) months. According to transplant type, there was no significant difference between UD- and Haplo-HSCT (96.1% vs 86.0%, P=0.30). 3 of 50 (6%) patients had primary engraft failure. Haplo-HSCT developed higher significantly incidence of Ⅱ–Ⅳ aGVHD (37.5% vs 3.83%, P=0.003) and cGVHD (37.5% vs 15.3%, P=0.030) than UD-HSCT. Haplo-HSCT also had significantly higher incidences of CMV viremia (78.2% vs 46.1%, P=0.005) and EBV viremia (43.1% vs 16.0%, P=0.040), respectively than UD-HSCT. But the incidences of hemorrhagic cystitis were similar between two transplant types (39.1% vs 23.0%, P=0.120). CONCLUSION: This study showed favorable outcome of Haplo-HSCT for SAA, which was comparable with UD-HSCT. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7342309 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2016 |
publisher | Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73423092020-07-16 亲缘半相合与无关供者造血干细胞移植治疗重型再生障碍性贫血的疗效比较 Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 论著 OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of HLA-haploidentical donor hematopoietic transplantation (Haplo-HSCT) for severe aplastic anemia (SAA) by compared with the same period of unrelated donor transplantation (UD-HSCT). METHODS: Of a cohort of 50 SAA patients between September 2012 and July 2014, 26 patients underwent UD-HSCT and 24 patients Haplo-HSCT. RESULTS: OS rate was 91.3% with a median follow-up of 9 (2–26) months. According to transplant type, there was no significant difference between UD- and Haplo-HSCT (96.1% vs 86.0%, P=0.30). 3 of 50 (6%) patients had primary engraft failure. Haplo-HSCT developed higher significantly incidence of Ⅱ–Ⅳ aGVHD (37.5% vs 3.83%, P=0.003) and cGVHD (37.5% vs 15.3%, P=0.030) than UD-HSCT. Haplo-HSCT also had significantly higher incidences of CMV viremia (78.2% vs 46.1%, P=0.005) and EBV viremia (43.1% vs 16.0%, P=0.040), respectively than UD-HSCT. But the incidences of hemorrhagic cystitis were similar between two transplant types (39.1% vs 23.0%, P=0.120). CONCLUSION: This study showed favorable outcome of Haplo-HSCT for SAA, which was comparable with UD-HSCT. Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology 2016-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7342309/ /pubmed/26876251 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2016.01.007 Text en 2016年版权归中华医学会所有 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (CC-BY-NC). The Copyright own by Publisher. Without authorization, shall not reprint, except this publication article, shall not use this publication format design. Unless otherwise stated, all articles published in this journal do not represent the views of the Chinese Medical Association or the editorial board of this journal. |
spellingShingle | 论著 亲缘半相合与无关供者造血干细胞移植治疗重型再生障碍性贫血的疗效比较 |
title | 亲缘半相合与无关供者造血干细胞移植治疗重型再生障碍性贫血的疗效比较 |
title_full | 亲缘半相合与无关供者造血干细胞移植治疗重型再生障碍性贫血的疗效比较 |
title_fullStr | 亲缘半相合与无关供者造血干细胞移植治疗重型再生障碍性贫血的疗效比较 |
title_full_unstemmed | 亲缘半相合与无关供者造血干细胞移植治疗重型再生障碍性贫血的疗效比较 |
title_short | 亲缘半相合与无关供者造血干细胞移植治疗重型再生障碍性贫血的疗效比较 |
title_sort | 亲缘半相合与无关供者造血干细胞移植治疗重型再生障碍性贫血的疗效比较 |
topic | 论著 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7342309/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26876251 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2016.01.007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT qīnyuánbànxiānghéyǔwúguāngōngzhězàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáozhòngxíngzàishēngzhàngàixìngpínxuèdeliáoxiàobǐjiào AT qīnyuánbànxiānghéyǔwúguāngōngzhězàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáozhòngxíngzàishēngzhàngàixìngpínxuèdeliáoxiàobǐjiào AT qīnyuánbànxiānghéyǔwúguāngōngzhězàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáozhòngxíngzàishēngzhàngàixìngpínxuèdeliáoxiàobǐjiào AT qīnyuánbànxiānghéyǔwúguāngōngzhězàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáozhòngxíngzàishēngzhàngàixìngpínxuèdeliáoxiàobǐjiào AT qīnyuánbànxiānghéyǔwúguāngōngzhězàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáozhòngxíngzàishēngzhàngàixìngpínxuèdeliáoxiàobǐjiào AT qīnyuánbànxiānghéyǔwúguāngōngzhězàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáozhòngxíngzàishēngzhàngàixìngpínxuèdeliáoxiàobǐjiào AT qīnyuánbànxiānghéyǔwúguāngōngzhězàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáozhòngxíngzàishēngzhàngàixìngpínxuèdeliáoxiàobǐjiào AT qīnyuánbànxiānghéyǔwúguāngōngzhězàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáozhòngxíngzàishēngzhàngàixìngpínxuèdeliáoxiàobǐjiào AT qīnyuánbànxiānghéyǔwúguāngōngzhězàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáozhòngxíngzàishēngzhàngàixìngpínxuèdeliáoxiàobǐjiào AT qīnyuánbànxiānghéyǔwúguāngōngzhězàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáozhòngxíngzàishēngzhàngàixìngpínxuèdeliáoxiàobǐjiào AT qīnyuánbànxiānghéyǔwúguāngōngzhězàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáozhòngxíngzàishēngzhàngàixìngpínxuèdeliáoxiàobǐjiào |