Cargando…

地西他滨联合预激方案治疗53例复发难治正常核型急性髓系白血病的疗效分析

OBJECTIVE: To study clinical characteristics of refractory or relapsed DNMT3A(+) cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (CN-AML) patients, and to explore the overall response rate (ORR) and side effects of these patients followed the therapy including decitabine with CAG or CAG-like regimen....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7342321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26759106
http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2015.12.010
_version_ 1783555445918531584
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To study clinical characteristics of refractory or relapsed DNMT3A(+) cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (CN-AML) patients, and to explore the overall response rate (ORR) and side effects of these patients followed the therapy including decitabine with CAG or CAG-like regimen. METHODS: In this study we retrospectively analyzed 53 refractory or relapsed CN-AML patients receiving the therapy including decitabine combined with CAG and CAG-like regimen in our center from April 2011 to October 2014. The clinical characteristics and ORR were further analyzed. Based on gene mutations, these patients could be divided into 2 groups: DNMT3A(+) AML patients (n=24) and DNMT3A(−)AML patients (n=29). RESULTS: The median age of DNMT3A(+) AML patients was 46 years old, higher white blood cells and bone marrow blasts were observed in DNMT3A(+) AML group. The ORR and complete response (CR) rate of DNMT3A(+) group were 62.50% and 54.17%, respectively. No differences were observed in ORR and CR rates (P>0.05) between these two groups. DNMT3A(+)/FLT3-ITD(+) CN-AML patients (n=14) had higher ORR and CR rates than DNMT3A(−)/FLT3-ITD(+)CN-AML patients (n=15) (P=0.040 and 0.042, respectively). The one-year overall survival (OS) of DNMT3A(+) AML group and DNMT3A(−)AML group were 59.58%, 54.09%, no differences were observed (P=0.438). 25 patients received further therapy of allo-HSCT, the one-year OS of DNMT3A(+) CN-AML was 87.50% and one-year disease free survival (DFS) was 72.73%, while the one-year OS was 61.54% and one-year DFS was 58.02% in DNMT3A(−)group. No differences were observed between 2 groups (P=0.456, 0.217). CONCLUSION: Decitabine combined with CAG or CAG-like regimen was an effective and safe treatment for refractory or relapsed CN-AML patients. Compared to DNMT3A(−)/FLT3-ITD(+) CN-AML patients, DNMT3A(+)/FLT3-ITD(+) CN-AML patients had higher ORR and CR rates. Decitabine bridged hematopoietic stem cells transplant could likely improve the survival of refractory or relapsed CN-AML patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7342321
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73423212020-07-16 地西他滨联合预激方案治疗53例复发难治正常核型急性髓系白血病的疗效分析 Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 论著 OBJECTIVE: To study clinical characteristics of refractory or relapsed DNMT3A(+) cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (CN-AML) patients, and to explore the overall response rate (ORR) and side effects of these patients followed the therapy including decitabine with CAG or CAG-like regimen. METHODS: In this study we retrospectively analyzed 53 refractory or relapsed CN-AML patients receiving the therapy including decitabine combined with CAG and CAG-like regimen in our center from April 2011 to October 2014. The clinical characteristics and ORR were further analyzed. Based on gene mutations, these patients could be divided into 2 groups: DNMT3A(+) AML patients (n=24) and DNMT3A(−)AML patients (n=29). RESULTS: The median age of DNMT3A(+) AML patients was 46 years old, higher white blood cells and bone marrow blasts were observed in DNMT3A(+) AML group. The ORR and complete response (CR) rate of DNMT3A(+) group were 62.50% and 54.17%, respectively. No differences were observed in ORR and CR rates (P>0.05) between these two groups. DNMT3A(+)/FLT3-ITD(+) CN-AML patients (n=14) had higher ORR and CR rates than DNMT3A(−)/FLT3-ITD(+)CN-AML patients (n=15) (P=0.040 and 0.042, respectively). The one-year overall survival (OS) of DNMT3A(+) AML group and DNMT3A(−)AML group were 59.58%, 54.09%, no differences were observed (P=0.438). 25 patients received further therapy of allo-HSCT, the one-year OS of DNMT3A(+) CN-AML was 87.50% and one-year disease free survival (DFS) was 72.73%, while the one-year OS was 61.54% and one-year DFS was 58.02% in DNMT3A(−)group. No differences were observed between 2 groups (P=0.456, 0.217). CONCLUSION: Decitabine combined with CAG or CAG-like regimen was an effective and safe treatment for refractory or relapsed CN-AML patients. Compared to DNMT3A(−)/FLT3-ITD(+) CN-AML patients, DNMT3A(+)/FLT3-ITD(+) CN-AML patients had higher ORR and CR rates. Decitabine bridged hematopoietic stem cells transplant could likely improve the survival of refractory or relapsed CN-AML patients. Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology 2015-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7342321/ /pubmed/26759106 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2015.12.010 Text en 2015年版权归中华医学会所有 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (CC-BY-NC). The Copyright own by Publisher. Without authorization, shall not reprint, except this publication article, shall not use this publication format design. Unless otherwise stated, all articles published in this journal do not represent the views of the Chinese Medical Association or the editorial board of this journal.
spellingShingle 论著
地西他滨联合预激方案治疗53例复发难治正常核型急性髓系白血病的疗效分析
title 地西他滨联合预激方案治疗53例复发难治正常核型急性髓系白血病的疗效分析
title_full 地西他滨联合预激方案治疗53例复发难治正常核型急性髓系白血病的疗效分析
title_fullStr 地西他滨联合预激方案治疗53例复发难治正常核型急性髓系白血病的疗效分析
title_full_unstemmed 地西他滨联合预激方案治疗53例复发难治正常核型急性髓系白血病的疗效分析
title_short 地西他滨联合预激方案治疗53例复发难治正常核型急性髓系白血病的疗效分析
title_sort 地西他滨联合预激方案治疗53例复发难治正常核型急性髓系白血病的疗效分析
topic 论著
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7342321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26759106
http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2015.12.010
work_keys_str_mv AT dexītābīnliánhéyùjīfāngànzhìliáo53lìfùfānánzhìzhèngchánghéxíngjíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàofēnxī
AT dexītābīnliánhéyùjīfāngànzhìliáo53lìfùfānánzhìzhèngchánghéxíngjíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàofēnxī
AT dexītābīnliánhéyùjīfāngànzhìliáo53lìfùfānánzhìzhèngchánghéxíngjíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàofēnxī
AT dexītābīnliánhéyùjīfāngànzhìliáo53lìfùfānánzhìzhèngchánghéxíngjíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàofēnxī
AT dexītābīnliánhéyùjīfāngànzhìliáo53lìfùfānánzhìzhèngchánghéxíngjíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàofēnxī
AT dexītābīnliánhéyùjīfāngànzhìliáo53lìfùfānánzhìzhèngchánghéxíngjíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàofēnxī
AT dexītābīnliánhéyùjīfāngànzhìliáo53lìfùfānánzhìzhèngchánghéxíngjíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàofēnxī
AT dexītābīnliánhéyùjīfāngànzhìliáo53lìfùfānánzhìzhèngchánghéxíngjíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàofēnxī