Cargando…

How do patients and the public understand overtesting and overdiagnosis? A protocol for a thematic meta-synthesis of qualitative research

INTRODUCTION: Examining patient and public understanding of overtesting and overdiagnosis (OverTD) is vital for reducing the burden of OverTD. Studies from disparate contexts, disciplines and focusing on disparate healthcare issues have examined patient and public understanding of OverTD. A synthesi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rozbroj, Tomas, Haas, Romi, O’Connor, Denise A, Thomas, Rae, McCaffery, Kirsten, Carter, Stacy, Buchbinder, Rachelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7342480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32636285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037283
_version_ 1783555497631154176
author Rozbroj, Tomas
Haas, Romi
O’Connor, Denise A
Thomas, Rae
McCaffery, Kirsten
Carter, Stacy
Buchbinder, Rachelle
author_facet Rozbroj, Tomas
Haas, Romi
O’Connor, Denise A
Thomas, Rae
McCaffery, Kirsten
Carter, Stacy
Buchbinder, Rachelle
author_sort Rozbroj, Tomas
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Examining patient and public understanding of overtesting and overdiagnosis (OverTD) is vital for reducing the burden of OverTD. Studies from disparate contexts, disciplines and focusing on disparate healthcare issues have examined patient and public understanding of OverTD. A synthesis is needed to bring this literature together, examine common themes, strengthen conclusions and identify gaps. This will help steer further research, policy and practice to improve patient and public understanding of OverTD. The objective of this study is to synthesise qualitative research data about patient and public understanding of OverTD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A thematic meta-synthesis will be used to synthesise primary qualitative research and qualitative components of primary mixed-methods research about patient and public understanding of OverTD. Studies published in English will be included. These will be identified using systematic searches from inception to March 2020 in the Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO and MEDLINE databases. Studies that satisfy eligibility criteria will be assessed for methodological quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist. Thematic meta-synthesis will comprise three stages: (1) line-by-line coding; (2) generation of descriptive themes and (3) generation of analytic themes. Confidence in the synthesis findings will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Confidence in Evidence (GRADE CERQual) approach. A summary of GRADE CERQual results will be presented alongside the key themes. Study eligibility screening, data extraction, analysis and the CASP and GRADE CERQual assessments will be undertaken independently by two review authors. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required for this secondary analysis of published data. The results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and may be presented in conference papers and elsewhere. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020156838
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7342480
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73424802020-07-09 How do patients and the public understand overtesting and overdiagnosis? A protocol for a thematic meta-synthesis of qualitative research Rozbroj, Tomas Haas, Romi O’Connor, Denise A Thomas, Rae McCaffery, Kirsten Carter, Stacy Buchbinder, Rachelle BMJ Open Health Services Research INTRODUCTION: Examining patient and public understanding of overtesting and overdiagnosis (OverTD) is vital for reducing the burden of OverTD. Studies from disparate contexts, disciplines and focusing on disparate healthcare issues have examined patient and public understanding of OverTD. A synthesis is needed to bring this literature together, examine common themes, strengthen conclusions and identify gaps. This will help steer further research, policy and practice to improve patient and public understanding of OverTD. The objective of this study is to synthesise qualitative research data about patient and public understanding of OverTD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A thematic meta-synthesis will be used to synthesise primary qualitative research and qualitative components of primary mixed-methods research about patient and public understanding of OverTD. Studies published in English will be included. These will be identified using systematic searches from inception to March 2020 in the Scopus, CINAHL, PsycINFO and MEDLINE databases. Studies that satisfy eligibility criteria will be assessed for methodological quality using the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) checklist. Thematic meta-synthesis will comprise three stages: (1) line-by-line coding; (2) generation of descriptive themes and (3) generation of analytic themes. Confidence in the synthesis findings will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Confidence in Evidence (GRADE CERQual) approach. A summary of GRADE CERQual results will be presented alongside the key themes. Study eligibility screening, data extraction, analysis and the CASP and GRADE CERQual assessments will be undertaken independently by two review authors. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval is not required for this secondary analysis of published data. The results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and may be presented in conference papers and elsewhere. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42020156838 BMJ Publishing Group 2020-07-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7342480/ /pubmed/32636285 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037283 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Rozbroj, Tomas
Haas, Romi
O’Connor, Denise A
Thomas, Rae
McCaffery, Kirsten
Carter, Stacy
Buchbinder, Rachelle
How do patients and the public understand overtesting and overdiagnosis? A protocol for a thematic meta-synthesis of qualitative research
title How do patients and the public understand overtesting and overdiagnosis? A protocol for a thematic meta-synthesis of qualitative research
title_full How do patients and the public understand overtesting and overdiagnosis? A protocol for a thematic meta-synthesis of qualitative research
title_fullStr How do patients and the public understand overtesting and overdiagnosis? A protocol for a thematic meta-synthesis of qualitative research
title_full_unstemmed How do patients and the public understand overtesting and overdiagnosis? A protocol for a thematic meta-synthesis of qualitative research
title_short How do patients and the public understand overtesting and overdiagnosis? A protocol for a thematic meta-synthesis of qualitative research
title_sort how do patients and the public understand overtesting and overdiagnosis? a protocol for a thematic meta-synthesis of qualitative research
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7342480/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32636285
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037283
work_keys_str_mv AT rozbrojtomas howdopatientsandthepublicunderstandovertestingandoverdiagnosisaprotocolforathematicmetasynthesisofqualitativeresearch
AT haasromi howdopatientsandthepublicunderstandovertestingandoverdiagnosisaprotocolforathematicmetasynthesisofqualitativeresearch
AT oconnordenisea howdopatientsandthepublicunderstandovertestingandoverdiagnosisaprotocolforathematicmetasynthesisofqualitativeresearch
AT thomasrae howdopatientsandthepublicunderstandovertestingandoverdiagnosisaprotocolforathematicmetasynthesisofqualitativeresearch
AT mccafferykirsten howdopatientsandthepublicunderstandovertestingandoverdiagnosisaprotocolforathematicmetasynthesisofqualitativeresearch
AT carterstacy howdopatientsandthepublicunderstandovertestingandoverdiagnosisaprotocolforathematicmetasynthesisofqualitativeresearch
AT buchbinderrachelle howdopatientsandthepublicunderstandovertestingandoverdiagnosisaprotocolforathematicmetasynthesisofqualitativeresearch