Cargando…

成人急性淋巴细胞白血病自体和异基因造血干细胞移植疗效对比分析

OBJECTVE: To compare the outcomes of adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who underwent autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). METHODS: From Jan 2007 to Dec 2010, 106 adult ALL patients were...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7342517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25854464
http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2015.03.008
_version_ 1783555507867353088
collection PubMed
description OBJECTVE: To compare the outcomes of adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who underwent autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). METHODS: From Jan 2007 to Dec 2010, 106 adult ALL patients were retrospectively divided into two groups, 50 in auto-HSCT group and 56 in allo-HSCT group. Auto-HSCT group included 21 patients with high-risk, 46 patients in CR(1) and 4 cases in CR(2). All the 50 patients had negative minimal residual disease (MRD) prior to HSCT. Allo-HSCT group included 44 patients with high risk, 51 patients in CR(1) and 5 cases in CR(2), 14 patients with positive MRD before allo-HSCT. RESULTS: Of the total 106 patients, 29 patients relapsed at a medium follow-up of 22.9(0.8–63.3) months. The 3-year cumulative relapse rate (RR) was (29.9±8.0)% in auto-HSCT group and (32.7±6.8)% in allo-HSCT group. There were no significant differences in RR and overall survival (OS) between auto-HSCT and allo-HSCT groups, even of stratified risk groups. In standard risk group, 3-year OS was (77.1±13.2)% in auto-HSCT group and (90.9±8.7)% in allo-HSCT group (P=0.739). In high-risk group, 3-year OS was (68.7±10.8)% after auto-HSCT and (45.2±8.5)% after allo-HSCT (P=0.094). CONCLUSION: Due to acceptable RR and OS, adult ALL patients with no MRD before HSCT showed favorable survival. Auto-HSCT may be a considerable choice for adult ALL patients with negative MRD when lacking of donors for allo-HSCT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7342517
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73425172020-07-16 成人急性淋巴细胞白血病自体和异基因造血干细胞移植疗效对比分析 Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 论著 OBJECTVE: To compare the outcomes of adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) who underwent autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). METHODS: From Jan 2007 to Dec 2010, 106 adult ALL patients were retrospectively divided into two groups, 50 in auto-HSCT group and 56 in allo-HSCT group. Auto-HSCT group included 21 patients with high-risk, 46 patients in CR(1) and 4 cases in CR(2). All the 50 patients had negative minimal residual disease (MRD) prior to HSCT. Allo-HSCT group included 44 patients with high risk, 51 patients in CR(1) and 5 cases in CR(2), 14 patients with positive MRD before allo-HSCT. RESULTS: Of the total 106 patients, 29 patients relapsed at a medium follow-up of 22.9(0.8–63.3) months. The 3-year cumulative relapse rate (RR) was (29.9±8.0)% in auto-HSCT group and (32.7±6.8)% in allo-HSCT group. There were no significant differences in RR and overall survival (OS) between auto-HSCT and allo-HSCT groups, even of stratified risk groups. In standard risk group, 3-year OS was (77.1±13.2)% in auto-HSCT group and (90.9±8.7)% in allo-HSCT group (P=0.739). In high-risk group, 3-year OS was (68.7±10.8)% after auto-HSCT and (45.2±8.5)% after allo-HSCT (P=0.094). CONCLUSION: Due to acceptable RR and OS, adult ALL patients with no MRD before HSCT showed favorable survival. Auto-HSCT may be a considerable choice for adult ALL patients with negative MRD when lacking of donors for allo-HSCT. Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology 2015-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7342517/ /pubmed/25854464 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2015.03.008 Text en 2015年版权归中华医学会所有 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (CC-BY-NC). The Copyright own by Publisher. Without authorization, shall not reprint, except this publication article, shall not use this publication format design. Unless otherwise stated, all articles published in this journal do not represent the views of the Chinese Medical Association or the editorial board of this journal.
spellingShingle 论著
成人急性淋巴细胞白血病自体和异基因造血干细胞移植疗效对比分析
title 成人急性淋巴细胞白血病自体和异基因造血干细胞移植疗效对比分析
title_full 成人急性淋巴细胞白血病自体和异基因造血干细胞移植疗效对比分析
title_fullStr 成人急性淋巴细胞白血病自体和异基因造血干细胞移植疗效对比分析
title_full_unstemmed 成人急性淋巴细胞白血病自体和异基因造血干细胞移植疗效对比分析
title_short 成人急性淋巴细胞白血病自体和异基因造血干细胞移植疗效对比分析
title_sort 成人急性淋巴细胞白血病自体和异基因造血干细胞移植疗效对比分析
topic 论著
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7342517/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25854464
http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2015.03.008
work_keys_str_mv AT chéngrénjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngzìtǐhéyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhíliáoxiàoduìbǐfēnxī
AT chéngrénjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngzìtǐhéyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhíliáoxiàoduìbǐfēnxī
AT chéngrénjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngzìtǐhéyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhíliáoxiàoduìbǐfēnxī
AT chéngrénjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngzìtǐhéyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhíliáoxiàoduìbǐfēnxī
AT chéngrénjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngzìtǐhéyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhíliáoxiàoduìbǐfēnxī
AT chéngrénjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngzìtǐhéyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhíliáoxiàoduìbǐfēnxī
AT chéngrénjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngzìtǐhéyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhíliáoxiàoduìbǐfēnxī
AT chéngrénjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngzìtǐhéyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhíliáoxiàoduìbǐfēnxī
AT chéngrénjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngzìtǐhéyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhíliáoxiàoduìbǐfēnxī
AT chéngrénjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngzìtǐhéyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhíliáoxiàoduìbǐfēnxī
AT chéngrénjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngzìtǐhéyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhíliáoxiàoduìbǐfēnxī
AT chéngrénjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngzìtǐhéyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhíliáoxiàoduìbǐfēnxī
AT chéngrénjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngzìtǐhéyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhíliáoxiàoduìbǐfēnxī
AT chéngrénjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngzìtǐhéyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhíliáoxiàoduìbǐfēnxī
AT chéngrénjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngzìtǐhéyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhíliáoxiàoduìbǐfēnxī
AT chéngrénjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngzìtǐhéyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhíliáoxiàoduìbǐfēnxī
AT chéngrénjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngzìtǐhéyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhíliáoxiàoduìbǐfēnxī