Cargando…
盐酸阿那格雷胶囊治疗原发性血小板增多症的有效性和安全性——多中心、随机对照临床研究
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of anagrelide in essential thrombocythemia (ET). METHODS: Patients who diagnosed as ET according to the World Health Organization classification were enrolled. Each patient was assigned to take anagrelide hydrochloride capsule or hydroxyurea tablet by r...
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology
2015
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7342634/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26304075 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2015.07.004 |
_version_ | 1783555550163763200 |
---|---|
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of anagrelide in essential thrombocythemia (ET). METHODS: Patients who diagnosed as ET according to the World Health Organization classification were enrolled. Each patient was assigned to take anagrelide hydrochloride capsule or hydroxyurea tablet by random 1∶1 ratio. Dose of anagrelide started at 2 mg/d, then increased gradually and the maximum dose was 10 mg/d until the platelet counts dropped to (100–400)×10(9)/L, one month later gradually reduced to maintain dose. The dose of hydroxyurea was 1000 mg/d at beginning, then increased gradually, when platelet counts dropped to (100–400)×10(9)/L and kept for one month, reduced to maintain dose as 10 mg·kg(−1)·d(−1). The observation period was 12 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 222 patients were enrolled in seventeen centers (including 113 patients treated with anagrelide and 109 with hydroxyurea). Therapy efficacy can be evaluated in 198 patients (including 97 patients administered with anagrelide and 101 with hydroxyurea). At 12(th) weeks of therapy, the hematologic remission rate was 87.63% (85/97) in anagrelide group and 88.12% (89/107) in hydroxyurea group, the differences between the two groups were not significant (P=0.173). Treatment with anagrelide lowered the platelet counts by a median of 393 (362–1 339)× 10(9)/L from a median of 827 (562–1657)×10(9)/L at the beginning of the observation to 400(127–1130)×10(9)/L after 12 weeks (P<0.001), which were similar to the treatment result of hydroxyurea by a median drop of 398 (597–1846)×10(9)/L (P=0.982). The median time to achieving response of anagrelide group was 7 (3-14) days, superior to that of hydroxyurea for 21 (14–28) significantly (P=0.003). Frequency of anagrelide related adverse events was 65.49 % (74/113), including cardiopalmus (36.28%), headache (21.24%), fatigue (14.16%) and dizzy (11.50%). CONCLUSION: Anagrelide was effective in patients with ET which had similar hematologic remission rate to hydroxyurea and could take effect more quickly than hydroxyurea. Incidence of adverse events was undifferentiated between anagrelide and hydroxyurea, but anagrelide treatment had tolerable adverse effects and no hematologic toxicity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7342634 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2015 |
publisher | Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73426342020-07-16 盐酸阿那格雷胶囊治疗原发性血小板增多症的有效性和安全性——多中心、随机对照临床研究 Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 论著 OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of anagrelide in essential thrombocythemia (ET). METHODS: Patients who diagnosed as ET according to the World Health Organization classification were enrolled. Each patient was assigned to take anagrelide hydrochloride capsule or hydroxyurea tablet by random 1∶1 ratio. Dose of anagrelide started at 2 mg/d, then increased gradually and the maximum dose was 10 mg/d until the platelet counts dropped to (100–400)×10(9)/L, one month later gradually reduced to maintain dose. The dose of hydroxyurea was 1000 mg/d at beginning, then increased gradually, when platelet counts dropped to (100–400)×10(9)/L and kept for one month, reduced to maintain dose as 10 mg·kg(−1)·d(−1). The observation period was 12 weeks. RESULTS: A total of 222 patients were enrolled in seventeen centers (including 113 patients treated with anagrelide and 109 with hydroxyurea). Therapy efficacy can be evaluated in 198 patients (including 97 patients administered with anagrelide and 101 with hydroxyurea). At 12(th) weeks of therapy, the hematologic remission rate was 87.63% (85/97) in anagrelide group and 88.12% (89/107) in hydroxyurea group, the differences between the two groups were not significant (P=0.173). Treatment with anagrelide lowered the platelet counts by a median of 393 (362–1 339)× 10(9)/L from a median of 827 (562–1657)×10(9)/L at the beginning of the observation to 400(127–1130)×10(9)/L after 12 weeks (P<0.001), which were similar to the treatment result of hydroxyurea by a median drop of 398 (597–1846)×10(9)/L (P=0.982). The median time to achieving response of anagrelide group was 7 (3-14) days, superior to that of hydroxyurea for 21 (14–28) significantly (P=0.003). Frequency of anagrelide related adverse events was 65.49 % (74/113), including cardiopalmus (36.28%), headache (21.24%), fatigue (14.16%) and dizzy (11.50%). CONCLUSION: Anagrelide was effective in patients with ET which had similar hematologic remission rate to hydroxyurea and could take effect more quickly than hydroxyurea. Incidence of adverse events was undifferentiated between anagrelide and hydroxyurea, but anagrelide treatment had tolerable adverse effects and no hematologic toxicity. Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology 2015-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7342634/ /pubmed/26304075 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2015.07.004 Text en 2015年版权归中华医学会所有 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (CC-BY-NC). The Copyright own by Publisher. Without authorization, shall not reprint, except this publication article, shall not use this publication format design. Unless otherwise stated, all articles published in this journal do not represent the views of the Chinese Medical Association or the editorial board of this journal. |
spellingShingle | 论著 盐酸阿那格雷胶囊治疗原发性血小板增多症的有效性和安全性——多中心、随机对照临床研究 |
title | 盐酸阿那格雷胶囊治疗原发性血小板增多症的有效性和安全性——多中心、随机对照临床研究 |
title_full | 盐酸阿那格雷胶囊治疗原发性血小板增多症的有效性和安全性——多中心、随机对照临床研究 |
title_fullStr | 盐酸阿那格雷胶囊治疗原发性血小板增多症的有效性和安全性——多中心、随机对照临床研究 |
title_full_unstemmed | 盐酸阿那格雷胶囊治疗原发性血小板增多症的有效性和安全性——多中心、随机对照临床研究 |
title_short | 盐酸阿那格雷胶囊治疗原发性血小板增多症的有效性和安全性——多中心、随机对照临床研究 |
title_sort | 盐酸阿那格雷胶囊治疗原发性血小板增多症的有效性和安全性——多中心、随机对照临床研究 |
topic | 论著 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7342634/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26304075 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2015.07.004 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yánsuānānàgéléijiāonángzhìliáoyuánfāxìngxuèxiǎobǎnzēngduōzhèngdeyǒuxiàoxìnghéānquánxìngduōzhōngxīnsuíjīduìzhàolínchuángyánjiū AT yánsuānānàgéléijiāonángzhìliáoyuánfāxìngxuèxiǎobǎnzēngduōzhèngdeyǒuxiàoxìnghéānquánxìngduōzhōngxīnsuíjīduìzhàolínchuángyánjiū AT yánsuānānàgéléijiāonángzhìliáoyuánfāxìngxuèxiǎobǎnzēngduōzhèngdeyǒuxiàoxìnghéānquánxìngduōzhōngxīnsuíjīduìzhàolínchuángyánjiū AT yánsuānānàgéléijiāonángzhìliáoyuánfāxìngxuèxiǎobǎnzēngduōzhèngdeyǒuxiàoxìnghéānquánxìngduōzhōngxīnsuíjīduìzhàolínchuángyánjiū AT yánsuānānàgéléijiāonángzhìliáoyuánfāxìngxuèxiǎobǎnzēngduōzhèngdeyǒuxiàoxìnghéānquánxìngduōzhōngxīnsuíjīduìzhàolínchuángyánjiū AT yánsuānānàgéléijiāonángzhìliáoyuánfāxìngxuèxiǎobǎnzēngduōzhèngdeyǒuxiàoxìnghéānquánxìngduōzhōngxīnsuíjīduìzhàolínchuángyánjiū AT yánsuānānàgéléijiāonángzhìliáoyuánfāxìngxuèxiǎobǎnzēngduōzhèngdeyǒuxiàoxìnghéānquánxìngduōzhōngxīnsuíjīduìzhàolínchuángyánjiū AT yánsuānānàgéléijiāonángzhìliáoyuánfāxìngxuèxiǎobǎnzēngduōzhèngdeyǒuxiàoxìnghéānquánxìngduōzhōngxīnsuíjīduìzhàolínchuángyánjiū AT yánsuānānàgéléijiāonángzhìliáoyuánfāxìngxuèxiǎobǎnzēngduōzhèngdeyǒuxiàoxìnghéānquánxìngduōzhōngxīnsuíjīduìzhàolínchuángyánjiū AT yánsuānānàgéléijiāonángzhìliáoyuánfāxìngxuèxiǎobǎnzēngduōzhèngdeyǒuxiàoxìnghéānquánxìngduōzhōngxīnsuíjīduìzhàolínchuángyánjiū AT yánsuānānàgéléijiāonángzhìliáoyuánfāxìngxuèxiǎobǎnzēngduōzhèngdeyǒuxiàoxìnghéānquánxìngduōzhōngxīnsuíjīduìzhàolínchuángyánjiū AT yánsuānānàgéléijiāonángzhìliáoyuánfāxìngxuèxiǎobǎnzēngduōzhèngdeyǒuxiàoxìnghéānquánxìngduōzhōngxīnsuíjīduìzhàolínchuángyánjiū AT yánsuānānàgéléijiāonángzhìliáoyuánfāxìngxuèxiǎobǎnzēngduōzhèngdeyǒuxiàoxìnghéānquánxìngduōzhōngxīnsuíjīduìzhàolínchuángyánjiū AT yánsuānānàgéléijiāonángzhìliáoyuánfāxìngxuèxiǎobǎnzēngduōzhèngdeyǒuxiàoxìnghéānquánxìngduōzhōngxīnsuíjīduìzhàolínchuángyánjiū AT yánsuānānàgéléijiāonángzhìliáoyuánfāxìngxuèxiǎobǎnzēngduōzhèngdeyǒuxiàoxìnghéānquánxìngduōzhōngxīnsuíjīduìzhàolínchuángyánjiū AT yánsuānānàgéléijiāonángzhìliáoyuánfāxìngxuèxiǎobǎnzēngduōzhèngdeyǒuxiàoxìnghéānquánxìngduōzhōngxīnsuíjīduìzhàolínchuángyánjiū AT yánsuānānàgéléijiāonángzhìliáoyuánfāxìngxuèxiǎobǎnzēngduōzhèngdeyǒuxiàoxìnghéānquánxìngduōzhōngxīnsuíjīduìzhàolínchuángyánjiū AT yánsuānānàgéléijiāonángzhìliáoyuánfāxìngxuèxiǎobǎnzēngduōzhèngdeyǒuxiàoxìnghéānquánxìngduōzhōngxīnsuíjīduìzhàolínchuángyánjiū AT yánsuānānàgéléijiāonángzhìliáoyuánfāxìngxuèxiǎobǎnzēngduōzhèngdeyǒuxiàoxìnghéānquánxìngduōzhōngxīnsuíjīduìzhàolínchuángyánjiū AT yánsuānānàgéléijiāonángzhìliáoyuánfāxìngxuèxiǎobǎnzēngduōzhèngdeyǒuxiàoxìnghéānquánxìngduōzhōngxīnsuíjīduìzhàolínchuángyánjiū |