Cargando…

酪氨酸激酶抑制剂联合化疗后行异基因造血干细胞移植治疗Ph(+)急性淋巴细胞白血病与异基因造血干细胞移植治疗Ph(−)急性淋巴细胞白血病的疗效比较

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of the Ph(+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients treated with combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and chemotherapy followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and Ph(−)ALL patients with allo-HSCT. METHODS: A total...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7342638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26304085
http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2015.07.014
_version_ 1783555551659032576
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of the Ph(+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients treated with combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and chemotherapy followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and Ph(−)ALL patients with allo-HSCT. METHODS: A total of 19 Ph(+)ALL patients were matched with 19 Ph(−)ALL patients from 55 B-ALL patients receiving allo-HSCT in our hospital between January 2003 and August 2014 and were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Gender, median age, number of patients with blood white count more than 30× 10(9)/L, number of patients with meningeal leukemia, disease status before allo-HSCT, period of allo-HSCT, the source of stem cell from donors, HLA disparities between donor and recipient, conditioning regimens and number of infused mononuclear cells and CD34(+) cells were comparable between two groups of Ph(+) and 19 Ph(−)ALL patients. The median time of engraftment of neutrophil cells was 12 days versus 13 days (P=0.284) and that of platelet 14 days versus 17 days (P=0.246), which were comparable between two groups. The estimated 3-year overall survival (OS) in Ph(+) and Ph-ALL groups was (67.5±12.4)% versus (74.3±11.4)% (P=0.434) and 3-year disease free survival (DFS) was (67.8±12.4)% versus (74.3±11.4)% (P=0.456), respectively. The cumulative incidence of degree Ⅱ-Ⅳ acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) in Ph(+) and Ph(−)ALL group was (15.8±8.4)% versus (21.1±9.4)% (P=0.665) and that of degree Ⅲ-Ⅳ aGVHD was (5.6±5.4)% versus (11.5±7.6)% (P=0.541), respectively. The cumulative incidence of cGVHD was (44.1±14.0)% in Ph(+)ALL group versus (44.1±13.0)% in Ph(−)ALL group (P=0.835) and that of extensive cGVHD was (13.1±8.7)% versus (6.2±6.1)% (P=0.379), respectively. The cumulative relapse rate and the cumulative non-relapse rate in both group also have no statistical difference [(10.8±7.2)% versus (20.0±10.7)% (P=0.957) and (23.9±12.4)% versus (7.1±6.9)% (P=0.224), respectively]. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of Ph(+)ALL treated with combination of chemotherapy and TKIs and followed by allo-HSCT is comparable to that of Ph(−)ALL with allo-HSCT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7342638
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73426382020-07-16 酪氨酸激酶抑制剂联合化疗后行异基因造血干细胞移植治疗Ph(+)急性淋巴细胞白血病与异基因造血干细胞移植治疗Ph(−)急性淋巴细胞白血病的疗效比较 Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 论著 OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of the Ph(+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) patients treated with combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and chemotherapy followed by allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) and Ph(−)ALL patients with allo-HSCT. METHODS: A total of 19 Ph(+)ALL patients were matched with 19 Ph(−)ALL patients from 55 B-ALL patients receiving allo-HSCT in our hospital between January 2003 and August 2014 and were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Gender, median age, number of patients with blood white count more than 30× 10(9)/L, number of patients with meningeal leukemia, disease status before allo-HSCT, period of allo-HSCT, the source of stem cell from donors, HLA disparities between donor and recipient, conditioning regimens and number of infused mononuclear cells and CD34(+) cells were comparable between two groups of Ph(+) and 19 Ph(−)ALL patients. The median time of engraftment of neutrophil cells was 12 days versus 13 days (P=0.284) and that of platelet 14 days versus 17 days (P=0.246), which were comparable between two groups. The estimated 3-year overall survival (OS) in Ph(+) and Ph-ALL groups was (67.5±12.4)% versus (74.3±11.4)% (P=0.434) and 3-year disease free survival (DFS) was (67.8±12.4)% versus (74.3±11.4)% (P=0.456), respectively. The cumulative incidence of degree Ⅱ-Ⅳ acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) in Ph(+) and Ph(−)ALL group was (15.8±8.4)% versus (21.1±9.4)% (P=0.665) and that of degree Ⅲ-Ⅳ aGVHD was (5.6±5.4)% versus (11.5±7.6)% (P=0.541), respectively. The cumulative incidence of cGVHD was (44.1±14.0)% in Ph(+)ALL group versus (44.1±13.0)% in Ph(−)ALL group (P=0.835) and that of extensive cGVHD was (13.1±8.7)% versus (6.2±6.1)% (P=0.379), respectively. The cumulative relapse rate and the cumulative non-relapse rate in both group also have no statistical difference [(10.8±7.2)% versus (20.0±10.7)% (P=0.957) and (23.9±12.4)% versus (7.1±6.9)% (P=0.224), respectively]. CONCLUSION: The efficacy of Ph(+)ALL treated with combination of chemotherapy and TKIs and followed by allo-HSCT is comparable to that of Ph(−)ALL with allo-HSCT. Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology 2015-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7342638/ /pubmed/26304085 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2015.07.014 Text en 2015年版权归中华医学会所有 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (CC-BY-NC). The Copyright own by Publisher. Without authorization, shall not reprint, except this publication article, shall not use this publication format design. Unless otherwise stated, all articles published in this journal do not represent the views of the Chinese Medical Association or the editorial board of this journal.
spellingShingle 论著
酪氨酸激酶抑制剂联合化疗后行异基因造血干细胞移植治疗Ph(+)急性淋巴细胞白血病与异基因造血干细胞移植治疗Ph(−)急性淋巴细胞白血病的疗效比较
title 酪氨酸激酶抑制剂联合化疗后行异基因造血干细胞移植治疗Ph(+)急性淋巴细胞白血病与异基因造血干细胞移植治疗Ph(−)急性淋巴细胞白血病的疗效比较
title_full 酪氨酸激酶抑制剂联合化疗后行异基因造血干细胞移植治疗Ph(+)急性淋巴细胞白血病与异基因造血干细胞移植治疗Ph(−)急性淋巴细胞白血病的疗效比较
title_fullStr 酪氨酸激酶抑制剂联合化疗后行异基因造血干细胞移植治疗Ph(+)急性淋巴细胞白血病与异基因造血干细胞移植治疗Ph(−)急性淋巴细胞白血病的疗效比较
title_full_unstemmed 酪氨酸激酶抑制剂联合化疗后行异基因造血干细胞移植治疗Ph(+)急性淋巴细胞白血病与异基因造血干细胞移植治疗Ph(−)急性淋巴细胞白血病的疗效比较
title_short 酪氨酸激酶抑制剂联合化疗后行异基因造血干细胞移植治疗Ph(+)急性淋巴细胞白血病与异基因造血干细胞移植治疗Ph(−)急性淋巴细胞白血病的疗效比较
title_sort 酪氨酸激酶抑制剂联合化疗后行异基因造血干细胞移植治疗ph(+)急性淋巴细胞白血病与异基因造血干细胞移植治疗ph(−)急性淋巴细胞白血病的疗效比较
topic 论著
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7342638/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26304085
http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2015.07.014
work_keys_str_mv AT làoānsuānjīméiyìzhìjìliánhéhuàliáohòuxíngyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáophjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngyǔyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáophjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT làoānsuānjīméiyìzhìjìliánhéhuàliáohòuxíngyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáophjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngyǔyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáophjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT làoānsuānjīméiyìzhìjìliánhéhuàliáohòuxíngyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáophjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngyǔyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáophjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT làoānsuānjīméiyìzhìjìliánhéhuàliáohòuxíngyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáophjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngyǔyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáophjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT làoānsuānjīméiyìzhìjìliánhéhuàliáohòuxíngyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáophjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngyǔyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáophjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT làoānsuānjīméiyìzhìjìliánhéhuàliáohòuxíngyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáophjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngyǔyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáophjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT làoānsuānjīméiyìzhìjìliánhéhuàliáohòuxíngyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáophjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngyǔyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáophjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT làoānsuānjīméiyìzhìjìliánhéhuàliáohòuxíngyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáophjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngyǔyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáophjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT làoānsuānjīméiyìzhìjìliánhéhuàliáohòuxíngyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáophjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngyǔyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáophjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT làoānsuānjīméiyìzhìjìliánhéhuàliáohòuxíngyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáophjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngyǔyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáophjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT làoānsuānjīméiyìzhìjìliánhéhuàliáohòuxíngyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáophjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngyǔyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáophjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT làoānsuānjīméiyìzhìjìliánhéhuàliáohòuxíngyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáophjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngyǔyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáophjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT làoānsuānjīméiyìzhìjìliánhéhuàliáohòuxíngyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáophjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngyǔyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáophjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT làoānsuānjīméiyìzhìjìliánhéhuàliáohòuxíngyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáophjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngyǔyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáophjíxìnglínbāxìbāobáixuèbìngdeliáoxiàobǐjiào