Cargando…

复发/难治自身免疫性溶血性贫血患者脾切除术疗效分析

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes of splenectomy in the treatment of relapsed/refractory autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA). METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed in 30 cases with relapsed/refractory AIHA who were treated with splenectomy in our hospital. The pre- and post-operative blood...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7342661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30831628
http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2019.02.007
_version_ 1783555560290910208
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes of splenectomy in the treatment of relapsed/refractory autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA). METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed in 30 cases with relapsed/refractory AIHA who were treated with splenectomy in our hospital. The pre- and post-operative blood routine indexes and responses were followed up. RESULTS: Among the 30 relapsed/refractory AIHA patients, 20 were pure AIHA (including 13 patients with warm antibody AIHA, 2 with warm-cold double antibody AIHA and 5 with Coombs negative AIHA) and 10 were Evans syndrome. The short-term response was evaluated 10–14 days after operation, and the overall response rate (ORR) of short-term response was 90% [12 cases in complete response (CR), 6 cases in partial response (PR)] in 20 therapeutic evaluable cases. Among 13 patients with long-term follow-up data, except 3 patients with Evans syndrome died (2 cases were refractory to splenectomy, 1 case relapsed after surgery), the ORR of 10 patients with relapsed/refractory pure AIHA at 6 months and 12 months were 90% (9/10) and 70% (7/10), respectively, with a median follow-up of 14 (4–156) months. At the end of follow-up, 3 cases had maintained CR for more than 3 years. CONCLUSION: The short-term response of splenectomy as a second-line treatment for relapsed/refractory AIHA is satisfactory, and long-term outcome of splenectomy is up to 70% at 1 year. Approximately one-third of patients could maintain sustained remission.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7342661
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73426612020-07-16 复发/难治自身免疫性溶血性贫血患者脾切除术疗效分析 Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 论著 OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the outcomes of splenectomy in the treatment of relapsed/refractory autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA). METHODS: Retrospective analysis was performed in 30 cases with relapsed/refractory AIHA who were treated with splenectomy in our hospital. The pre- and post-operative blood routine indexes and responses were followed up. RESULTS: Among the 30 relapsed/refractory AIHA patients, 20 were pure AIHA (including 13 patients with warm antibody AIHA, 2 with warm-cold double antibody AIHA and 5 with Coombs negative AIHA) and 10 were Evans syndrome. The short-term response was evaluated 10–14 days after operation, and the overall response rate (ORR) of short-term response was 90% [12 cases in complete response (CR), 6 cases in partial response (PR)] in 20 therapeutic evaluable cases. Among 13 patients with long-term follow-up data, except 3 patients with Evans syndrome died (2 cases were refractory to splenectomy, 1 case relapsed after surgery), the ORR of 10 patients with relapsed/refractory pure AIHA at 6 months and 12 months were 90% (9/10) and 70% (7/10), respectively, with a median follow-up of 14 (4–156) months. At the end of follow-up, 3 cases had maintained CR for more than 3 years. CONCLUSION: The short-term response of splenectomy as a second-line treatment for relapsed/refractory AIHA is satisfactory, and long-term outcome of splenectomy is up to 70% at 1 year. Approximately one-third of patients could maintain sustained remission. Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology 2019-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7342661/ /pubmed/30831628 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2019.02.007 Text en 2019年版权归中华医学会所有 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (CC-BY-NC). The Copyright own by Publisher. Without authorization, shall not reprint, except this publication article, shall not use this publication format design. Unless otherwise stated, all articles published in this journal do not represent the views of the Chinese Medical Association or the editorial board of this journal.
spellingShingle 论著
复发/难治自身免疫性溶血性贫血患者脾切除术疗效分析
title 复发/难治自身免疫性溶血性贫血患者脾切除术疗效分析
title_full 复发/难治自身免疫性溶血性贫血患者脾切除术疗效分析
title_fullStr 复发/难治自身免疫性溶血性贫血患者脾切除术疗效分析
title_full_unstemmed 复发/难治自身免疫性溶血性贫血患者脾切除术疗效分析
title_short 复发/难治自身免疫性溶血性贫血患者脾切除术疗效分析
title_sort 复发/难治自身免疫性溶血性贫血患者脾切除术疗效分析
topic 论著
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7342661/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30831628
http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2019.02.007
work_keys_str_mv AT fùfānánzhìzìshēnmiǎnyìxìngróngxuèxìngpínxuèhuànzhěpíqièchúshùliáoxiàofēnxī
AT fùfānánzhìzìshēnmiǎnyìxìngróngxuèxìngpínxuèhuànzhěpíqièchúshùliáoxiàofēnxī
AT fùfānánzhìzìshēnmiǎnyìxìngróngxuèxìngpínxuèhuànzhěpíqièchúshùliáoxiàofēnxī
AT fùfānánzhìzìshēnmiǎnyìxìngróngxuèxìngpínxuèhuànzhěpíqièchúshùliáoxiàofēnxī
AT fùfānánzhìzìshēnmiǎnyìxìngróngxuèxìngpínxuèhuànzhěpíqièchúshùliáoxiàofēnxī
AT fùfānánzhìzìshēnmiǎnyìxìngróngxuèxìngpínxuèhuànzhěpíqièchúshùliáoxiàofēnxī
AT fùfānánzhìzìshēnmiǎnyìxìngróngxuèxìngpínxuèhuànzhěpíqièchúshùliáoxiàofēnxī
AT fùfānánzhìzìshēnmiǎnyìxìngróngxuèxìngpínxuèhuànzhěpíqièchúshùliáoxiàofēnxī