Cargando…

不同异基因造血干细胞移植方式治疗167例中高危骨髓增生异常综合征疗效比较

OBJECTIVE: To investigate three different types of donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for intermediate and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). METHODS: Between August 2001 and May 2015, 167 consecutive patients with MDS in intermediate and high-risk who underwent allogeneic H...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7342729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28468091
http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2017.04.008
_version_ 1783555586112094208
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To investigate three different types of donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for intermediate and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). METHODS: Between August 2001 and May 2015, 167 consecutive patients with MDS in intermediate and high-risk who underwent allogeneic HSCT were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: With the median follow up of 60 (12–177) months, The total 5-year DFS was 67.8% (95%CI 60.0%–75.6%). Among three different types of donor, 5-year DFS rates were 68.0% (95%CI 54.1%–81.9%) in MSD-HSCT vs 77.4% (95%CI 62.1%–92.7%) in MUD-HSCT vs 64.0% (95% CI 52.4%–75.6%) in Haplo-HSCT (P=0.632), respectively. Univariate analysis showed that median disease course before HSCT was the influencing factor of DFS (P=0.018). Five-year relapse and TRM had no correlation with the above-mentioned factor. CONCLUSION: Haplo-HSCT for intermediate and high-risk MDS achieved similar effect produced by MUD or MSD, Haplo-HSCT could be used as an important alternative donor. allo-HSCT must be performed on intermediate and high-risk MDS patients as early as possible after diagnosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7342729
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73427292020-07-16 不同异基因造血干细胞移植方式治疗167例中高危骨髓增生异常综合征疗效比较 Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 论著 OBJECTIVE: To investigate three different types of donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for intermediate and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). METHODS: Between August 2001 and May 2015, 167 consecutive patients with MDS in intermediate and high-risk who underwent allogeneic HSCT were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: With the median follow up of 60 (12–177) months, The total 5-year DFS was 67.8% (95%CI 60.0%–75.6%). Among three different types of donor, 5-year DFS rates were 68.0% (95%CI 54.1%–81.9%) in MSD-HSCT vs 77.4% (95%CI 62.1%–92.7%) in MUD-HSCT vs 64.0% (95% CI 52.4%–75.6%) in Haplo-HSCT (P=0.632), respectively. Univariate analysis showed that median disease course before HSCT was the influencing factor of DFS (P=0.018). Five-year relapse and TRM had no correlation with the above-mentioned factor. CONCLUSION: Haplo-HSCT for intermediate and high-risk MDS achieved similar effect produced by MUD or MSD, Haplo-HSCT could be used as an important alternative donor. allo-HSCT must be performed on intermediate and high-risk MDS patients as early as possible after diagnosis. Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology 2017-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7342729/ /pubmed/28468091 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2017.04.008 Text en 2017年版权归中华医学会所有 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (CC-BY-NC). The Copyright own by Publisher. Without authorization, shall not reprint, except this publication article, shall not use this publication format design. Unless otherwise stated, all articles published in this journal do not represent the views of the Chinese Medical Association or the editorial board of this journal.
spellingShingle 论著
不同异基因造血干细胞移植方式治疗167例中高危骨髓增生异常综合征疗效比较
title 不同异基因造血干细胞移植方式治疗167例中高危骨髓增生异常综合征疗效比较
title_full 不同异基因造血干细胞移植方式治疗167例中高危骨髓增生异常综合征疗效比较
title_fullStr 不同异基因造血干细胞移植方式治疗167例中高危骨髓增生异常综合征疗效比较
title_full_unstemmed 不同异基因造血干细胞移植方式治疗167例中高危骨髓增生异常综合征疗效比较
title_short 不同异基因造血干细胞移植方式治疗167例中高危骨髓增生异常综合征疗效比较
title_sort 不同异基因造血干细胞移植方式治疗167例中高危骨髓增生异常综合征疗效比较
topic 论著
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7342729/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28468091
http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2017.04.008
work_keys_str_mv AT bùtóngyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhífāngshìzhìliáo167lìzhōnggāowēigǔsuǐzēngshēngyìchángzōnghézhēngliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT bùtóngyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhífāngshìzhìliáo167lìzhōnggāowēigǔsuǐzēngshēngyìchángzōnghézhēngliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT bùtóngyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhífāngshìzhìliáo167lìzhōnggāowēigǔsuǐzēngshēngyìchángzōnghézhēngliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT bùtóngyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhífāngshìzhìliáo167lìzhōnggāowēigǔsuǐzēngshēngyìchángzōnghézhēngliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT bùtóngyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhífāngshìzhìliáo167lìzhōnggāowēigǔsuǐzēngshēngyìchángzōnghézhēngliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT bùtóngyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhífāngshìzhìliáo167lìzhōnggāowēigǔsuǐzēngshēngyìchángzōnghézhēngliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT bùtóngyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhífāngshìzhìliáo167lìzhōnggāowēigǔsuǐzēngshēngyìchángzōnghézhēngliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT bùtóngyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhífāngshìzhìliáo167lìzhōnggāowēigǔsuǐzēngshēngyìchángzōnghézhēngliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT bùtóngyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhífāngshìzhìliáo167lìzhōnggāowēigǔsuǐzēngshēngyìchángzōnghézhēngliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT bùtóngyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhífāngshìzhìliáo167lìzhōnggāowēigǔsuǐzēngshēngyìchángzōnghézhēngliáoxiàobǐjiào
AT bùtóngyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhífāngshìzhìliáo167lìzhōnggāowēigǔsuǐzēngshēngyìchángzōnghézhēngliáoxiàobǐjiào