Cargando…
不同异基因造血干细胞移植方式治疗167例中高危骨髓增生异常综合征疗效比较
OBJECTIVE: To investigate three different types of donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for intermediate and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). METHODS: Between August 2001 and May 2015, 167 consecutive patients with MDS in intermediate and high-risk who underwent allogeneic H...
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7342729/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28468091 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2017.04.008 |
_version_ | 1783555586112094208 |
---|---|
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To investigate three different types of donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for intermediate and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). METHODS: Between August 2001 and May 2015, 167 consecutive patients with MDS in intermediate and high-risk who underwent allogeneic HSCT were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: With the median follow up of 60 (12–177) months, The total 5-year DFS was 67.8% (95%CI 60.0%–75.6%). Among three different types of donor, 5-year DFS rates were 68.0% (95%CI 54.1%–81.9%) in MSD-HSCT vs 77.4% (95%CI 62.1%–92.7%) in MUD-HSCT vs 64.0% (95% CI 52.4%–75.6%) in Haplo-HSCT (P=0.632), respectively. Univariate analysis showed that median disease course before HSCT was the influencing factor of DFS (P=0.018). Five-year relapse and TRM had no correlation with the above-mentioned factor. CONCLUSION: Haplo-HSCT for intermediate and high-risk MDS achieved similar effect produced by MUD or MSD, Haplo-HSCT could be used as an important alternative donor. allo-HSCT must be performed on intermediate and high-risk MDS patients as early as possible after diagnosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7342729 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73427292020-07-16 不同异基因造血干细胞移植方式治疗167例中高危骨髓增生异常综合征疗效比较 Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 论著 OBJECTIVE: To investigate three different types of donor hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) for intermediate and high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). METHODS: Between August 2001 and May 2015, 167 consecutive patients with MDS in intermediate and high-risk who underwent allogeneic HSCT were analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: With the median follow up of 60 (12–177) months, The total 5-year DFS was 67.8% (95%CI 60.0%–75.6%). Among three different types of donor, 5-year DFS rates were 68.0% (95%CI 54.1%–81.9%) in MSD-HSCT vs 77.4% (95%CI 62.1%–92.7%) in MUD-HSCT vs 64.0% (95% CI 52.4%–75.6%) in Haplo-HSCT (P=0.632), respectively. Univariate analysis showed that median disease course before HSCT was the influencing factor of DFS (P=0.018). Five-year relapse and TRM had no correlation with the above-mentioned factor. CONCLUSION: Haplo-HSCT for intermediate and high-risk MDS achieved similar effect produced by MUD or MSD, Haplo-HSCT could be used as an important alternative donor. allo-HSCT must be performed on intermediate and high-risk MDS patients as early as possible after diagnosis. Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology 2017-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7342729/ /pubmed/28468091 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2017.04.008 Text en 2017年版权归中华医学会所有 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (CC-BY-NC). The Copyright own by Publisher. Without authorization, shall not reprint, except this publication article, shall not use this publication format design. Unless otherwise stated, all articles published in this journal do not represent the views of the Chinese Medical Association or the editorial board of this journal. |
spellingShingle | 论著 不同异基因造血干细胞移植方式治疗167例中高危骨髓增生异常综合征疗效比较 |
title | 不同异基因造血干细胞移植方式治疗167例中高危骨髓增生异常综合征疗效比较 |
title_full | 不同异基因造血干细胞移植方式治疗167例中高危骨髓增生异常综合征疗效比较 |
title_fullStr | 不同异基因造血干细胞移植方式治疗167例中高危骨髓增生异常综合征疗效比较 |
title_full_unstemmed | 不同异基因造血干细胞移植方式治疗167例中高危骨髓增生异常综合征疗效比较 |
title_short | 不同异基因造血干细胞移植方式治疗167例中高危骨髓增生异常综合征疗效比较 |
title_sort | 不同异基因造血干细胞移植方式治疗167例中高危骨髓增生异常综合征疗效比较 |
topic | 论著 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7342729/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28468091 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2017.04.008 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bùtóngyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhífāngshìzhìliáo167lìzhōnggāowēigǔsuǐzēngshēngyìchángzōnghézhēngliáoxiàobǐjiào AT bùtóngyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhífāngshìzhìliáo167lìzhōnggāowēigǔsuǐzēngshēngyìchángzōnghézhēngliáoxiàobǐjiào AT bùtóngyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhífāngshìzhìliáo167lìzhōnggāowēigǔsuǐzēngshēngyìchángzōnghézhēngliáoxiàobǐjiào AT bùtóngyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhífāngshìzhìliáo167lìzhōnggāowēigǔsuǐzēngshēngyìchángzōnghézhēngliáoxiàobǐjiào AT bùtóngyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhífāngshìzhìliáo167lìzhōnggāowēigǔsuǐzēngshēngyìchángzōnghézhēngliáoxiàobǐjiào AT bùtóngyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhífāngshìzhìliáo167lìzhōnggāowēigǔsuǐzēngshēngyìchángzōnghézhēngliáoxiàobǐjiào AT bùtóngyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhífāngshìzhìliáo167lìzhōnggāowēigǔsuǐzēngshēngyìchángzōnghézhēngliáoxiàobǐjiào AT bùtóngyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhífāngshìzhìliáo167lìzhōnggāowēigǔsuǐzēngshēngyìchángzōnghézhēngliáoxiàobǐjiào AT bùtóngyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhífāngshìzhìliáo167lìzhōnggāowēigǔsuǐzēngshēngyìchángzōnghézhēngliáoxiàobǐjiào AT bùtóngyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhífāngshìzhìliáo167lìzhōnggāowēigǔsuǐzēngshēngyìchángzōnghézhēngliáoxiàobǐjiào AT bùtóngyìjīyīnzàoxuègànxìbāoyízhífāngshìzhìliáo167lìzhōnggāowēigǔsuǐzēngshēngyìchángzōnghézhēngliáoxiàobǐjiào |