Cargando…

供受者性别组合对急性白血病单倍体相合造血干细胞移植预后的影响

OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of donor-recipient sex matching on outcome of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) for acute leukemia in the setting of T-cell-replete transplants. METHODS: The retrospective study is based on 1 160 consecutive patients who receive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology 2018
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7342888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29779349
http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2018.05.010
_version_ 1783555621017092096
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of donor-recipient sex matching on outcome of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) for acute leukemia in the setting of T-cell-replete transplants. METHODS: The retrospective study is based on 1 160 consecutive patients who received their first haplo-HSCT for acute leukemia between April 2002 and December 2014 at Peking University Institute of Hematology. The patients were divided into the sex-matched group and sex-mismatched group in terms of the recipient and donor sex. Then we conducted an analysis in four subgroups, male patients with male donors (M→M), male patients with female donors (F→M), female patients with female donors (F→F), and female patients with male donors (M→F). Transplant outcomes were measured in terms of hematopoietic recovery, acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD), relapse, nonrelapse mortality (NRM), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in the above four subgroups. Then univariate and multivariate analysis were conducted. RESULTS: There was a higher 3-year and 5-year NRM but no difference in other transplant outcomes in sex-mismatched group when compared with the sex-matched group. F→M was compared with M→M, and the former group had higher 3-year and 5-year cumulative incidences of NRM (25.5% vs 16.1%, P=0.002; 27.1% vs 17.3%, P=0.002), decreased 5-year DFS (56.9% vs 64.4%, P=0.044), decreased 3-year OS (62.6% vs 69.8%, P=0.045). There was no significant difference in 3-year DFS and 5-year OS. There was no significant difference in grade Ⅱ–Ⅳ aGVHD and cGVHD incidence. When F→F group was compared with M→F group, only a higher grade Ⅱ–Ⅳ aGVHD incidence (43.9% vs 34.6%, P=0.047) existed. F→M was proved to be the independent risk factor influencing NRM and OS in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: In haplo-HSCT for acute leukemia, the donor-recipient sex combination of male patients with female donors was of a poorer prognosis, so a male donor was a better choice for a male patient.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7342888
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2018
publisher Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73428882020-07-16 供受者性别组合对急性白血病单倍体相合造血干细胞移植预后的影响 Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 论著 OBJECTIVE: To determine the influence of donor-recipient sex matching on outcome of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT) for acute leukemia in the setting of T-cell-replete transplants. METHODS: The retrospective study is based on 1 160 consecutive patients who received their first haplo-HSCT for acute leukemia between April 2002 and December 2014 at Peking University Institute of Hematology. The patients were divided into the sex-matched group and sex-mismatched group in terms of the recipient and donor sex. Then we conducted an analysis in four subgroups, male patients with male donors (M→M), male patients with female donors (F→M), female patients with female donors (F→F), and female patients with male donors (M→F). Transplant outcomes were measured in terms of hematopoietic recovery, acute graft versus host disease (aGVHD), relapse, nonrelapse mortality (NRM), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in the above four subgroups. Then univariate and multivariate analysis were conducted. RESULTS: There was a higher 3-year and 5-year NRM but no difference in other transplant outcomes in sex-mismatched group when compared with the sex-matched group. F→M was compared with M→M, and the former group had higher 3-year and 5-year cumulative incidences of NRM (25.5% vs 16.1%, P=0.002; 27.1% vs 17.3%, P=0.002), decreased 5-year DFS (56.9% vs 64.4%, P=0.044), decreased 3-year OS (62.6% vs 69.8%, P=0.045). There was no significant difference in 3-year DFS and 5-year OS. There was no significant difference in grade Ⅱ–Ⅳ aGVHD and cGVHD incidence. When F→F group was compared with M→F group, only a higher grade Ⅱ–Ⅳ aGVHD incidence (43.9% vs 34.6%, P=0.047) existed. F→M was proved to be the independent risk factor influencing NRM and OS in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: In haplo-HSCT for acute leukemia, the donor-recipient sex combination of male patients with female donors was of a poorer prognosis, so a male donor was a better choice for a male patient. Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology 2018-05 /pmc/articles/PMC7342888/ /pubmed/29779349 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2018.05.010 Text en 2018年版权归中华医学会所有 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (CC-BY-NC). The Copyright own by Publisher. Without authorization, shall not reprint, except this publication article, shall not use this publication format design. Unless otherwise stated, all articles published in this journal do not represent the views of the Chinese Medical Association or the editorial board of this journal.
spellingShingle 论著
供受者性别组合对急性白血病单倍体相合造血干细胞移植预后的影响
title 供受者性别组合对急性白血病单倍体相合造血干细胞移植预后的影响
title_full 供受者性别组合对急性白血病单倍体相合造血干细胞移植预后的影响
title_fullStr 供受者性别组合对急性白血病单倍体相合造血干细胞移植预后的影响
title_full_unstemmed 供受者性别组合对急性白血病单倍体相合造血干细胞移植预后的影响
title_short 供受者性别组合对急性白血病单倍体相合造血干细胞移植预后的影响
title_sort 供受者性别组合对急性白血病单倍体相合造血干细胞移植预后的影响
topic 论著
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7342888/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29779349
http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2018.05.010
work_keys_str_mv AT gōngshòuzhěxìngbiézǔhéduìjíxìngbáixuèbìngdānbèitǐxiānghézàoxuègànxìbāoyízhíyùhòudeyǐngxiǎng
AT gōngshòuzhěxìngbiézǔhéduìjíxìngbáixuèbìngdānbèitǐxiānghézàoxuègànxìbāoyízhíyùhòudeyǐngxiǎng
AT gōngshòuzhěxìngbiézǔhéduìjíxìngbáixuèbìngdānbèitǐxiānghézàoxuègànxìbāoyízhíyùhòudeyǐngxiǎng
AT gōngshòuzhěxìngbiézǔhéduìjíxìngbáixuèbìngdānbèitǐxiānghézàoxuègànxìbāoyízhíyùhòudeyǐngxiǎng
AT gōngshòuzhěxìngbiézǔhéduìjíxìngbáixuèbìngdānbèitǐxiānghézàoxuègànxìbāoyízhíyùhòudeyǐngxiǎng
AT gōngshòuzhěxìngbiézǔhéduìjíxìngbáixuèbìngdānbèitǐxiānghézàoxuègànxìbāoyízhíyùhòudeyǐngxiǎng