Cargando…

不同巩固治疗方式对低危组急性髓系白血病患者预后的影响

OBJECTIVE: To explore the impact on prognosis in favorable-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with different consolidation regimens after first complete remission (CR(1)). METHODS: A total of 107 cases of non-refractory adult AML from January 2010 to June 2015 in single center were enrolled...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7342968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28655096
http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2017.06.010
_version_ 1783555651135340544
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To explore the impact on prognosis in favorable-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with different consolidation regimens after first complete remission (CR(1)). METHODS: A total of 107 cases of non-refractory adult AML from January 2010 to June 2015 in single center were enrolled in the study. HD-Ara-C group (38 cases) as the control group, we explore the prognosis in three consolidation regimens, including micro-transplantation (16 cases), autologous transplantation (auto-PBSCT, 14 cases), allogeneic transplantation (allo-HSCT, 39 cases). RESULTS: Of 107 patients (59 males and 48 females), with a median age of 33 (16–59) years old and a median follow-up of 36.5 (5.3–79.1) months, the overall relapse rate was 20.6% (22/107), and overall mortality rate was 18.7% (20/107). The 5 years cumulative relapse rate (CIR) of HD-Ara-C, micro-transplantation, auto-PBSCT and allo-HSCT group were 39.7%, 6.2%, 14.3% and 5.6%, respectively (P<0.001). The CIR of the observed group was lower than the HD-Ara-C group. The 5 years progression-free survival (PFS) rate of HD-Ara-C, micro-transplantation, auto-PBSCT and allo-HSCT group were 44.7%, 93.8%, 85.7% and 78.1%, respectively (P=0.011). The PFS of observed groups were similar, but superior to that in HD-Ara-C group. The 5-year overall survival (OS) in four groups was 54.9%, 100%, 92.9% and 77.4%, respectively (P>0.05). Multiple factors analysis showed that compared to HD-Ara-C regimen, allo-HSCT could improve PFS (HR=0.376, P=0.031), but not OS (P>0.05); micro-transplantation and auto-PBSCT could not improve the PFS or OS (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: As compared with HD-Ara-C regimen, allo-HSCT could obviously decrease CIR, improve PFS, but treatment-related mortality is high. These results show that auto-PBSCT and micro-transplantation have similar outcomes, compared to HD-Ara-C regimen, so both can be used as a option of consolidation treatment for favorable-risk AML.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7342968
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73429682020-07-16 不同巩固治疗方式对低危组急性髓系白血病患者预后的影响 Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 论著 OBJECTIVE: To explore the impact on prognosis in favorable-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with different consolidation regimens after first complete remission (CR(1)). METHODS: A total of 107 cases of non-refractory adult AML from January 2010 to June 2015 in single center were enrolled in the study. HD-Ara-C group (38 cases) as the control group, we explore the prognosis in three consolidation regimens, including micro-transplantation (16 cases), autologous transplantation (auto-PBSCT, 14 cases), allogeneic transplantation (allo-HSCT, 39 cases). RESULTS: Of 107 patients (59 males and 48 females), with a median age of 33 (16–59) years old and a median follow-up of 36.5 (5.3–79.1) months, the overall relapse rate was 20.6% (22/107), and overall mortality rate was 18.7% (20/107). The 5 years cumulative relapse rate (CIR) of HD-Ara-C, micro-transplantation, auto-PBSCT and allo-HSCT group were 39.7%, 6.2%, 14.3% and 5.6%, respectively (P<0.001). The CIR of the observed group was lower than the HD-Ara-C group. The 5 years progression-free survival (PFS) rate of HD-Ara-C, micro-transplantation, auto-PBSCT and allo-HSCT group were 44.7%, 93.8%, 85.7% and 78.1%, respectively (P=0.011). The PFS of observed groups were similar, but superior to that in HD-Ara-C group. The 5-year overall survival (OS) in four groups was 54.9%, 100%, 92.9% and 77.4%, respectively (P>0.05). Multiple factors analysis showed that compared to HD-Ara-C regimen, allo-HSCT could improve PFS (HR=0.376, P=0.031), but not OS (P>0.05); micro-transplantation and auto-PBSCT could not improve the PFS or OS (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: As compared with HD-Ara-C regimen, allo-HSCT could obviously decrease CIR, improve PFS, but treatment-related mortality is high. These results show that auto-PBSCT and micro-transplantation have similar outcomes, compared to HD-Ara-C regimen, so both can be used as a option of consolidation treatment for favorable-risk AML. Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology 2017-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7342968/ /pubmed/28655096 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2017.06.010 Text en 2017年版权归中华医学会所有 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (CC-BY-NC). The Copyright own by Publisher. Without authorization, shall not reprint, except this publication article, shall not use this publication format design. Unless otherwise stated, all articles published in this journal do not represent the views of the Chinese Medical Association or the editorial board of this journal.
spellingShingle 论著
不同巩固治疗方式对低危组急性髓系白血病患者预后的影响
title 不同巩固治疗方式对低危组急性髓系白血病患者预后的影响
title_full 不同巩固治疗方式对低危组急性髓系白血病患者预后的影响
title_fullStr 不同巩固治疗方式对低危组急性髓系白血病患者预后的影响
title_full_unstemmed 不同巩固治疗方式对低危组急性髓系白血病患者预后的影响
title_short 不同巩固治疗方式对低危组急性髓系白血病患者预后的影响
title_sort 不同巩固治疗方式对低危组急性髓系白血病患者预后的影响
topic 论著
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7342968/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28655096
http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2017.06.010
work_keys_str_mv AT bùtónggǒnggùzhìliáofāngshìduìdīwēizǔjíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìnghuànzhěyùhòudeyǐngxiǎng
AT bùtónggǒnggùzhìliáofāngshìduìdīwēizǔjíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìnghuànzhěyùhòudeyǐngxiǎng
AT bùtónggǒnggùzhìliáofāngshìduìdīwēizǔjíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìnghuànzhěyùhòudeyǐngxiǎng
AT bùtónggǒnggùzhìliáofāngshìduìdīwēizǔjíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìnghuànzhěyùhòudeyǐngxiǎng
AT bùtónggǒnggùzhìliáofāngshìduìdīwēizǔjíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìnghuànzhěyùhòudeyǐngxiǎng
AT bùtónggǒnggùzhìliáofāngshìduìdīwēizǔjíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìnghuànzhěyùhòudeyǐngxiǎng
AT bùtónggǒnggùzhìliáofāngshìduìdīwēizǔjíxìngsuǐxìbáixuèbìnghuànzhěyùhòudeyǐngxiǎng