Cargando…
非血缘脐血干细胞移植与同胞造血干细胞移植治疗MDS-EB和AML-MRC的对比观察
OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy of umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from HLA-matched sibling donors (MSD-HSCT) in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome-EB (MDS-EB) or acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (AM...
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
---|---|
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7343011/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31104440 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2019.04.006 |
_version_ | 1783555667736395776 |
---|---|
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy of umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from HLA-matched sibling donors (MSD-HSCT) in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome-EB (MDS-EB) or acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC). METHODS: A cohort of 64 patients (including 38 cases of MDS-EB and 26 cases of AML-MRC) who received UCBT/MSD-HSCT from February 2011 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: ①Compared with MSD-HSCT group, UCBT group had a higher proportion of AML-MRC patients [52.8% (19/36) vs 25.0% (7/28), P=0.025], and a lower median age [13 (1.5-52) years vs 32 (10-57) years, P=0.001]. ②The engraftment of neutrophils both in UCBT and MSD-HSCT groups on +42 d was 100%, and the median engraftment time was 17.5 (11–31) d and 11.5 (10–20) d, respectively. The engraftment of platelet at +100 d in UCBT group was 91.4%, the median engraftment time was 40 (15–96) d; The engraftment of platelet at +100 d in MSD-HSCT group was 100%, and the median engraftment time was 15 (11–43) d. ③There were no statistically significant differences in terms of the cumulative incidence of Ⅱ-Ⅳ and Ⅲ/Ⅳ aGVHD of 100 d and transplant related mortality (TRM) of 180 d, relapse rate, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) between UCBT and MSD-HSCT groups (P>0.05). ④The 3-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) and severe chronic GVHD in UCBT group were lower than of MSD-HSCT group [28.3% (95%CI 13.4%–45.3%) vs 67.9% (95%CI 46.1%–82.4%), P=0.002; 10.3% (95%CI 2.5%–24.8%) vs 50.0% (95%CI 30.0%–67.1%), respectively, P<0.001]. The cumulative 3-year incidence of GVHD-free and relapse-free survival (GRFS) of UCBT group was significantly higher than of MSD-HSCT group [55.0% (95%CI 36.0%–70.6%) vs 28.6% (95%CI 13.5%–45.6%), P=0.038]. CONCLUSION: UCBT could obtain better quality of life after transplantation than MSD-HSCT in treatment of MDS-EB/AML-MRC. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7343011 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73430112020-07-16 非血缘脐血干细胞移植与同胞造血干细胞移植治疗MDS-EB和AML-MRC的对比观察 Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 论著 OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy of umbilical cord blood transplantation (UCBT) and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation from HLA-matched sibling donors (MSD-HSCT) in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome-EB (MDS-EB) or acute myeloid leukemia with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC). METHODS: A cohort of 64 patients (including 38 cases of MDS-EB and 26 cases of AML-MRC) who received UCBT/MSD-HSCT from February 2011 to December 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: ①Compared with MSD-HSCT group, UCBT group had a higher proportion of AML-MRC patients [52.8% (19/36) vs 25.0% (7/28), P=0.025], and a lower median age [13 (1.5-52) years vs 32 (10-57) years, P=0.001]. ②The engraftment of neutrophils both in UCBT and MSD-HSCT groups on +42 d was 100%, and the median engraftment time was 17.5 (11–31) d and 11.5 (10–20) d, respectively. The engraftment of platelet at +100 d in UCBT group was 91.4%, the median engraftment time was 40 (15–96) d; The engraftment of platelet at +100 d in MSD-HSCT group was 100%, and the median engraftment time was 15 (11–43) d. ③There were no statistically significant differences in terms of the cumulative incidence of Ⅱ-Ⅳ and Ⅲ/Ⅳ aGVHD of 100 d and transplant related mortality (TRM) of 180 d, relapse rate, overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS) between UCBT and MSD-HSCT groups (P>0.05). ④The 3-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) and severe chronic GVHD in UCBT group were lower than of MSD-HSCT group [28.3% (95%CI 13.4%–45.3%) vs 67.9% (95%CI 46.1%–82.4%), P=0.002; 10.3% (95%CI 2.5%–24.8%) vs 50.0% (95%CI 30.0%–67.1%), respectively, P<0.001]. The cumulative 3-year incidence of GVHD-free and relapse-free survival (GRFS) of UCBT group was significantly higher than of MSD-HSCT group [55.0% (95%CI 36.0%–70.6%) vs 28.6% (95%CI 13.5%–45.6%), P=0.038]. CONCLUSION: UCBT could obtain better quality of life after transplantation than MSD-HSCT in treatment of MDS-EB/AML-MRC. Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology 2019-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7343011/ /pubmed/31104440 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2019.04.006 Text en 2019年版权归中华医学会所有 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (CC-BY-NC). The Copyright own by Publisher. Without authorization, shall not reprint, except this publication article, shall not use this publication format design. Unless otherwise stated, all articles published in this journal do not represent the views of the Chinese Medical Association or the editorial board of this journal. |
spellingShingle | 论著 非血缘脐血干细胞移植与同胞造血干细胞移植治疗MDS-EB和AML-MRC的对比观察 |
title | 非血缘脐血干细胞移植与同胞造血干细胞移植治疗MDS-EB和AML-MRC的对比观察 |
title_full | 非血缘脐血干细胞移植与同胞造血干细胞移植治疗MDS-EB和AML-MRC的对比观察 |
title_fullStr | 非血缘脐血干细胞移植与同胞造血干细胞移植治疗MDS-EB和AML-MRC的对比观察 |
title_full_unstemmed | 非血缘脐血干细胞移植与同胞造血干细胞移植治疗MDS-EB和AML-MRC的对比观察 |
title_short | 非血缘脐血干细胞移植与同胞造血干细胞移植治疗MDS-EB和AML-MRC的对比观察 |
title_sort | 非血缘脐血干细胞移植与同胞造血干细胞移植治疗mds-eb和aml-mrc的对比观察 |
topic | 论著 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7343011/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31104440 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2019.04.006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fēixuèyuánqíxuègànxìbāoyízhíyǔtóngbāozàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáomdsebhéamlmrcdeduìbǐguānchá AT fēixuèyuánqíxuègànxìbāoyízhíyǔtóngbāozàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáomdsebhéamlmrcdeduìbǐguānchá AT fēixuèyuánqíxuègànxìbāoyízhíyǔtóngbāozàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáomdsebhéamlmrcdeduìbǐguānchá AT fēixuèyuánqíxuègànxìbāoyízhíyǔtóngbāozàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáomdsebhéamlmrcdeduìbǐguānchá AT fēixuèyuánqíxuègànxìbāoyízhíyǔtóngbāozàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáomdsebhéamlmrcdeduìbǐguānchá AT fēixuèyuánqíxuègànxìbāoyízhíyǔtóngbāozàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáomdsebhéamlmrcdeduìbǐguānchá AT fēixuèyuánqíxuègànxìbāoyízhíyǔtóngbāozàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáomdsebhéamlmrcdeduìbǐguānchá AT fēixuèyuánqíxuègànxìbāoyízhíyǔtóngbāozàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáomdsebhéamlmrcdeduìbǐguānchá AT fēixuèyuánqíxuègànxìbāoyízhíyǔtóngbāozàoxuègànxìbāoyízhízhìliáomdsebhéamlmrcdeduìbǐguānchá |