Cargando…

血清游离轻链比值及差值对初诊多发性骨髓瘤患者预后价值的评估与比较

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognostic value of serum free light chain ratio (rFLC) and difference (dFLC) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). METHODS: Clinical data of 479 cases of newly diagnosed MM patients with FLC test records referred to our hospital from January 2012 to March 2016 were coll...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7343019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31104445
http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2019.04.011
_version_ 1783555670837035008
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognostic value of serum free light chain ratio (rFLC) and difference (dFLC) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). METHODS: Clinical data of 479 cases of newly diagnosed MM patients with FLC test records referred to our hospital from January 2012 to March 2016 were collected. rFLC preferred cut-off values were selected as≤14.828,14.828-364.597, ≥364.597 according to the literatures. The dFLC was divided into ≤112.85,112.85-2891.83, ≥2891.83 mg/L three groups. The rFLC and dFLC values among the death, the non-death, the progress and the non-progress groups were compared by t test. The correlation analysis showed that the rFLC and dFLC values were related to the death or progression of the disease. Logistic regression was used to analyze the correlation between each factor and death or progression. Univariate survival analysis (PFS) and total survival (OS) were performed using Kaplan-Meier. Single-variable and multivariate prognostic analysis were performed using Cox model. RESULTS: The cutoff values of rFLC less than 14.828 or dFLC less than or equal to 112.85 mg/L impacted most significant on OS and PFS of the patients (P<0.05). Different rFLC cut-off values between two groups showed that when rFLC=14.828, OS was significantly better than the other two groups (NR vs 61 & 47 months, P=0.019); different dFLC cut-off values between two groups disclosed that PFS and OS were statistically significant when dFLC less than or equal to 112.85 mg/L compared with the other two groups (P<0.05). The 4-year PFS/OS rates in the initial dFLC≤112.85 mg/L and rFLC≤14.828 groups was significantly higher than of the other two groups. CONCLUSION: Different cutoff levels of rFLC and dFLC might have obviously effects on the prognoses of patients with newly diagnosed MM. The difference of survival prognosis would be more pronounced when rFLC≤14.828 or dFLC≤112.85 mg/L with lower risk of death and lower risk ratio, which might be ideal cutoff value for determining the prognosis of these patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7343019
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73430192020-07-16 血清游离轻链比值及差值对初诊多发性骨髓瘤患者预后价值的评估与比较 Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 论著 OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prognostic value of serum free light chain ratio (rFLC) and difference (dFLC) in patients with multiple myeloma (MM). METHODS: Clinical data of 479 cases of newly diagnosed MM patients with FLC test records referred to our hospital from January 2012 to March 2016 were collected. rFLC preferred cut-off values were selected as≤14.828,14.828-364.597, ≥364.597 according to the literatures. The dFLC was divided into ≤112.85,112.85-2891.83, ≥2891.83 mg/L three groups. The rFLC and dFLC values among the death, the non-death, the progress and the non-progress groups were compared by t test. The correlation analysis showed that the rFLC and dFLC values were related to the death or progression of the disease. Logistic regression was used to analyze the correlation between each factor and death or progression. Univariate survival analysis (PFS) and total survival (OS) were performed using Kaplan-Meier. Single-variable and multivariate prognostic analysis were performed using Cox model. RESULTS: The cutoff values of rFLC less than 14.828 or dFLC less than or equal to 112.85 mg/L impacted most significant on OS and PFS of the patients (P<0.05). Different rFLC cut-off values between two groups showed that when rFLC=14.828, OS was significantly better than the other two groups (NR vs 61 & 47 months, P=0.019); different dFLC cut-off values between two groups disclosed that PFS and OS were statistically significant when dFLC less than or equal to 112.85 mg/L compared with the other two groups (P<0.05). The 4-year PFS/OS rates in the initial dFLC≤112.85 mg/L and rFLC≤14.828 groups was significantly higher than of the other two groups. CONCLUSION: Different cutoff levels of rFLC and dFLC might have obviously effects on the prognoses of patients with newly diagnosed MM. The difference of survival prognosis would be more pronounced when rFLC≤14.828 or dFLC≤112.85 mg/L with lower risk of death and lower risk ratio, which might be ideal cutoff value for determining the prognosis of these patients. Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology 2019-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7343019/ /pubmed/31104445 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2019.04.011 Text en 2019年版权归中华医学会所有 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (CC-BY-NC). The Copyright own by Publisher. Without authorization, shall not reprint, except this publication article, shall not use this publication format design. Unless otherwise stated, all articles published in this journal do not represent the views of the Chinese Medical Association or the editorial board of this journal.
spellingShingle 论著
血清游离轻链比值及差值对初诊多发性骨髓瘤患者预后价值的评估与比较
title 血清游离轻链比值及差值对初诊多发性骨髓瘤患者预后价值的评估与比较
title_full 血清游离轻链比值及差值对初诊多发性骨髓瘤患者预后价值的评估与比较
title_fullStr 血清游离轻链比值及差值对初诊多发性骨髓瘤患者预后价值的评估与比较
title_full_unstemmed 血清游离轻链比值及差值对初诊多发性骨髓瘤患者预后价值的评估与比较
title_short 血清游离轻链比值及差值对初诊多发性骨髓瘤患者预后价值的评估与比较
title_sort 血清游离轻链比值及差值对初诊多发性骨髓瘤患者预后价值的评估与比较
topic 论著
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7343019/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/31104445
http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2019.04.011
work_keys_str_mv AT xuèqīngyóulíqīngliànbǐzhíjíchàzhíduìchūzhěnduōfāxìnggǔsuǐliúhuànzhěyùhòujiàzhídepínggūyǔbǐjiào
AT xuèqīngyóulíqīngliànbǐzhíjíchàzhíduìchūzhěnduōfāxìnggǔsuǐliúhuànzhěyùhòujiàzhídepínggūyǔbǐjiào
AT xuèqīngyóulíqīngliànbǐzhíjíchàzhíduìchūzhěnduōfāxìnggǔsuǐliúhuànzhěyùhòujiàzhídepínggūyǔbǐjiào
AT xuèqīngyóulíqīngliànbǐzhíjíchàzhíduìchūzhěnduōfāxìnggǔsuǐliúhuànzhěyùhòujiàzhídepínggūyǔbǐjiào
AT xuèqīngyóulíqīngliànbǐzhíjíchàzhíduìchūzhěnduōfāxìnggǔsuǐliúhuànzhěyùhòujiàzhídepínggūyǔbǐjiào
AT xuèqīngyóulíqīngliànbǐzhíjíchàzhíduìchūzhěnduōfāxìnggǔsuǐliúhuànzhěyùhòujiàzhídepínggūyǔbǐjiào
AT xuèqīngyóulíqīngliànbǐzhíjíchàzhíduìchūzhěnduōfāxìnggǔsuǐliúhuànzhěyùhòujiàzhídepínggūyǔbǐjiào
AT xuèqīngyóulíqīngliànbǐzhíjíchàzhíduìchūzhěnduōfāxìnggǔsuǐliúhuànzhěyùhòujiàzhídepínggūyǔbǐjiào
AT xuèqīngyóulíqīngliànbǐzhíjíchàzhíduìchūzhěnduōfāxìnggǔsuǐliúhuànzhěyùhòujiàzhídepínggūyǔbǐjiào
AT xuèqīngyóulíqīngliànbǐzhíjíchàzhíduìchūzhěnduōfāxìnggǔsuǐliúhuànzhěyùhòujiàzhídepínggūyǔbǐjiào
AT xuèqīngyóulíqīngliànbǐzhíjíchàzhíduìchūzhěnduōfāxìnggǔsuǐliúhuànzhěyùhòujiàzhídepínggūyǔbǐjiào
AT xuèqīngyóulíqīngliànbǐzhíjíchàzhíduìchūzhěnduōfāxìnggǔsuǐliúhuànzhěyùhòujiàzhídepínggūyǔbǐjiào