Cargando…

多发性骨髓瘤伴单纯骨旁髓外病变临床分析——单中心连续性834例患者资料研究

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the incidence, clinical features, prognosis of bone-related extramedullary disease (bEMD) and its relationship with strict EMD (sEMD) in MM patients. METHODS: The records of 834 consecutive newly diagnosed patients with MM in our hospital between 1993 and 2013 were retrospectiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7343062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26134017
http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2015.06.012
_version_ 1783555682993176576
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To analyse the incidence, clinical features, prognosis of bone-related extramedullary disease (bEMD) and its relationship with strict EMD (sEMD) in MM patients. METHODS: The records of 834 consecutive newly diagnosed patients with MM in our hospital between 1993 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: ①Among 834 patients at diagnosis, 32 cases (3.8%) showed bEMD, and 40 cases (4.8%) showed sEMD. Patients with bEMD at presentation showed significant lower level of lactate dehydrogenase (180.9 U/L vs 299.2 U/L, P=0.034) and higher overall response rate (ORR) (95.7% vs 66.7%, P=0.009) compared with sEMD patients. While the above two parameters were comparable between patients with bEMD and without EMD. ②As to the prognosis of patients without autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT), the overall survival (OS) of patients with sEMD, bEMD and without EMD was 14.0, 37.5, and 38.0 months, respectively. The time to progression (TTP) of the three groups was 11.5, 27.0, and 22.0 months, respectively. Compared to the patients with sEMD, the outcomes (both OS and TTP) of the other two groups was significantly better (P< 0.05). Patients with bEMD at presentation was comparable to the patients without EMD, but the two groups were better than the patients with sEMD. ③The incidence of bEMD during follow-up was 0.5%. The OS of patients with sEMD, bEMD and without EMD during follow-up was 26.0, 17.0, and 40.0 months, respectively. The TTP of the three groups was 13.0, 11.0, and 25.0 months, respectively. The outcomes (both OS and TTP) of patients with bEMD at relapse/progression showed no significant difference as compared with the other two groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: The clinical features of MM patients with bEMD are different from the patients with sEMD. Outcomes of this population is significantly better than the latter, and is comparable to the patients without EMD. It suggests that bEMD alone has no negative prognostic significance in MM patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7343062
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73430622020-07-16 多发性骨髓瘤伴单纯骨旁髓外病变临床分析——单中心连续性834例患者资料研究 Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 论著 OBJECTIVE: To analyse the incidence, clinical features, prognosis of bone-related extramedullary disease (bEMD) and its relationship with strict EMD (sEMD) in MM patients. METHODS: The records of 834 consecutive newly diagnosed patients with MM in our hospital between 1993 and 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: ①Among 834 patients at diagnosis, 32 cases (3.8%) showed bEMD, and 40 cases (4.8%) showed sEMD. Patients with bEMD at presentation showed significant lower level of lactate dehydrogenase (180.9 U/L vs 299.2 U/L, P=0.034) and higher overall response rate (ORR) (95.7% vs 66.7%, P=0.009) compared with sEMD patients. While the above two parameters were comparable between patients with bEMD and without EMD. ②As to the prognosis of patients without autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT), the overall survival (OS) of patients with sEMD, bEMD and without EMD was 14.0, 37.5, and 38.0 months, respectively. The time to progression (TTP) of the three groups was 11.5, 27.0, and 22.0 months, respectively. Compared to the patients with sEMD, the outcomes (both OS and TTP) of the other two groups was significantly better (P< 0.05). Patients with bEMD at presentation was comparable to the patients without EMD, but the two groups were better than the patients with sEMD. ③The incidence of bEMD during follow-up was 0.5%. The OS of patients with sEMD, bEMD and without EMD during follow-up was 26.0, 17.0, and 40.0 months, respectively. The TTP of the three groups was 13.0, 11.0, and 25.0 months, respectively. The outcomes (both OS and TTP) of patients with bEMD at relapse/progression showed no significant difference as compared with the other two groups (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: The clinical features of MM patients with bEMD are different from the patients with sEMD. Outcomes of this population is significantly better than the latter, and is comparable to the patients without EMD. It suggests that bEMD alone has no negative prognostic significance in MM patients. Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology 2015-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7343062/ /pubmed/26134017 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2015.06.012 Text en 2015年版权归中华医学会所有 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (CC-BY-NC). The Copyright own by Publisher. Without authorization, shall not reprint, except this publication article, shall not use this publication format design. Unless otherwise stated, all articles published in this journal do not represent the views of the Chinese Medical Association or the editorial board of this journal.
spellingShingle 论著
多发性骨髓瘤伴单纯骨旁髓外病变临床分析——单中心连续性834例患者资料研究
title 多发性骨髓瘤伴单纯骨旁髓外病变临床分析——单中心连续性834例患者资料研究
title_full 多发性骨髓瘤伴单纯骨旁髓外病变临床分析——单中心连续性834例患者资料研究
title_fullStr 多发性骨髓瘤伴单纯骨旁髓外病变临床分析——单中心连续性834例患者资料研究
title_full_unstemmed 多发性骨髓瘤伴单纯骨旁髓外病变临床分析——单中心连续性834例患者资料研究
title_short 多发性骨髓瘤伴单纯骨旁髓外病变临床分析——单中心连续性834例患者资料研究
title_sort 多发性骨髓瘤伴单纯骨旁髓外病变临床分析——单中心连续性834例患者资料研究
topic 论著
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7343062/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26134017
http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2015.06.012
work_keys_str_mv AT duōfāxìnggǔsuǐliúbàndānchúngǔpángsuǐwàibìngbiànlínchuángfēnxīdānzhōngxīnliánxùxìng834lìhuànzhězīliàoyánjiū
AT duōfāxìnggǔsuǐliúbàndānchúngǔpángsuǐwàibìngbiànlínchuángfēnxīdānzhōngxīnliánxùxìng834lìhuànzhězīliàoyánjiū
AT duōfāxìnggǔsuǐliúbàndānchúngǔpángsuǐwàibìngbiànlínchuángfēnxīdānzhōngxīnliánxùxìng834lìhuànzhězīliàoyánjiū
AT duōfāxìnggǔsuǐliúbàndānchúngǔpángsuǐwàibìngbiànlínchuángfēnxīdānzhōngxīnliánxùxìng834lìhuànzhězīliàoyánjiū
AT duōfāxìnggǔsuǐliúbàndānchúngǔpángsuǐwàibìngbiànlínchuángfēnxīdānzhōngxīnliánxùxìng834lìhuànzhězīliàoyánjiū
AT duōfāxìnggǔsuǐliúbàndānchúngǔpángsuǐwàibìngbiànlínchuángfēnxīdānzhōngxīnliánxùxìng834lìhuànzhězīliàoyánjiū
AT duōfāxìnggǔsuǐliúbàndānchúngǔpángsuǐwàibìngbiànlínchuángfēnxīdānzhōngxīnliánxùxìng834lìhuànzhězīliàoyánjiū
AT duōfāxìnggǔsuǐliúbàndānchúngǔpángsuǐwàibìngbiànlínchuángfēnxīdānzhōngxīnliánxùxìng834lìhuànzhězīliàoyánjiū
AT duōfāxìnggǔsuǐliúbàndānchúngǔpángsuǐwàibìngbiànlínchuángfēnxīdānzhōngxīnliánxùxìng834lìhuànzhězīliàoyánjiū