Cargando…

不同分层方法对早期弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤预后价值的比较

OBJECTIVE: To compare the prognostic value of different models in patients with early-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). METHODS: Early-stage DLBCL patients diagnosed from January 2000 to December 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. All patients received with at least 2 cycles of immunoche...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7343097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27093984
http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2016.04.002
_version_ 1783555695737569280
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the prognostic value of different models in patients with early-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). METHODS: Early-stage DLBCL patients diagnosed from January 2000 to December 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. All patients received with at least 2 cycles of immunochemotherapy R-CHOP regimen (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) with or without radiotherapy. The prognostic value of international prognostic index (IPI), revised IPI (R-IPI) and enhanced IPI (NCCN-IPI) was compared. RESULTS: Ninety-seven cases of early-stage DLBCL were included in the study. The median age was 58 years (15–88 years) with a median follow-up of 34.7 months (range 7.3–77.4 months). The expected 5-year overall survival (OS) for entire group was 82%. There was no patient in the high risk group according to IPI or NCCN-IPI. According to IPI, the 5-year OS in the low, low intermediate, high intermediate risk groups were 95%, 38% and 60%, respectively. According to R-IPI, the 5-year OS in the very good, good, and poor risk groups were 93%, 75% and 60%, respectively. According to NCCN-IPI, the 5-year OS in the low, low intermediate, high intermediate risk groups were 92%, 85% and 29%, respectively. CONCLUSION: NCCN-IPI would be of an ideal prognostic model for early-stage DLBCL patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7343097
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2016
publisher Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73430972020-07-16 不同分层方法对早期弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤预后价值的比较 Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi 论著 OBJECTIVE: To compare the prognostic value of different models in patients with early-stage diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). METHODS: Early-stage DLBCL patients diagnosed from January 2000 to December 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. All patients received with at least 2 cycles of immunochemotherapy R-CHOP regimen (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, prednisone) with or without radiotherapy. The prognostic value of international prognostic index (IPI), revised IPI (R-IPI) and enhanced IPI (NCCN-IPI) was compared. RESULTS: Ninety-seven cases of early-stage DLBCL were included in the study. The median age was 58 years (15–88 years) with a median follow-up of 34.7 months (range 7.3–77.4 months). The expected 5-year overall survival (OS) for entire group was 82%. There was no patient in the high risk group according to IPI or NCCN-IPI. According to IPI, the 5-year OS in the low, low intermediate, high intermediate risk groups were 95%, 38% and 60%, respectively. According to R-IPI, the 5-year OS in the very good, good, and poor risk groups were 93%, 75% and 60%, respectively. According to NCCN-IPI, the 5-year OS in the low, low intermediate, high intermediate risk groups were 92%, 85% and 29%, respectively. CONCLUSION: NCCN-IPI would be of an ideal prognostic model for early-stage DLBCL patients. Editorial office of Chinese Journal of Hematology 2016-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7343097/ /pubmed/27093984 http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2016.04.002 Text en 2016年版权归中华医学会所有 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (CC-BY-NC). The Copyright own by Publisher. Without authorization, shall not reprint, except this publication article, shall not use this publication format design. Unless otherwise stated, all articles published in this journal do not represent the views of the Chinese Medical Association or the editorial board of this journal.
spellingShingle 论著
不同分层方法对早期弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤预后价值的比较
title 不同分层方法对早期弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤预后价值的比较
title_full 不同分层方法对早期弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤预后价值的比较
title_fullStr 不同分层方法对早期弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤预后价值的比较
title_full_unstemmed 不同分层方法对早期弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤预后价值的比较
title_short 不同分层方法对早期弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤预后价值的比较
title_sort 不同分层方法对早期弥漫大b细胞淋巴瘤预后价值的比较
topic 论著
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7343097/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27093984
http://dx.doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2016.04.002
work_keys_str_mv AT bùtóngfēncéngfāngfǎduìzǎoqīmímàndàbxìbāolínbāliúyùhòujiàzhídebǐjiào
AT bùtóngfēncéngfāngfǎduìzǎoqīmímàndàbxìbāolínbāliúyùhòujiàzhídebǐjiào
AT bùtóngfēncéngfāngfǎduìzǎoqīmímàndàbxìbāolínbāliúyùhòujiàzhídebǐjiào
AT bùtóngfēncéngfāngfǎduìzǎoqīmímàndàbxìbāolínbāliúyùhòujiàzhídebǐjiào
AT bùtóngfēncéngfāngfǎduìzǎoqīmímàndàbxìbāolínbāliúyùhòujiàzhídebǐjiào
AT bùtóngfēncéngfāngfǎduìzǎoqīmímàndàbxìbāolínbāliúyùhòujiàzhídebǐjiào
AT bùtóngfēncéngfāngfǎduìzǎoqīmímàndàbxìbāolínbāliúyùhòujiàzhídebǐjiào
AT bùtóngfēncéngfāngfǎduìzǎoqīmímàndàbxìbāolínbāliúyùhòujiàzhídebǐjiào
AT bùtóngfēncéngfāngfǎduìzǎoqīmímàndàbxìbāolínbāliúyùhòujiàzhídebǐjiào
AT bùtóngfēncéngfāngfǎduìzǎoqīmímàndàbxìbāolínbāliúyùhòujiàzhídebǐjiào
AT bùtóngfēncéngfāngfǎduìzǎoqīmímàndàbxìbāolínbāliúyùhòujiàzhídebǐjiào
AT bùtóngfēncéngfāngfǎduìzǎoqīmímàndàbxìbāolínbāliúyùhòujiàzhídebǐjiào
AT bùtóngfēncéngfāngfǎduìzǎoqīmímàndàbxìbāolínbāliúyùhòujiàzhídebǐjiào
AT bùtóngfēncéngfāngfǎduìzǎoqīmímàndàbxìbāolínbāliúyùhòujiàzhídebǐjiào
AT bùtóngfēncéngfāngfǎduìzǎoqīmímàndàbxìbāolínbāliúyùhòujiàzhídebǐjiào
AT bùtóngfēncéngfāngfǎduìzǎoqīmímàndàbxìbāolínbāliúyùhòujiàzhídebǐjiào
AT bùtóngfēncéngfāngfǎduìzǎoqīmímàndàbxìbāolínbāliúyùhòujiàzhídebǐjiào
AT bùtóngfēncéngfāngfǎduìzǎoqīmímàndàbxìbāolínbāliúyùhòujiàzhídebǐjiào