Cargando…

The impact of the cumulative burden of LDL-c and hs-CRP on cardiovascular risk: a prospective, population-based study

Background: This study aims to demonstrate the impact of the cumulative burden of low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (cumLDL-c) and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (cumhs-CRP) on cardiovascular risk. Results: During the 4.62 (±0.70) years of follow-up, 2,148 (5.92%) participants had MACE. Both...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mo, Jinglin, Chen, Zimo, Xu, Jie, Wang, Anxin, Meng, Xia, Zhao, Xingquan, Li, Hao, Wu, Shouling, Wang, Yongjun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7343474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32544081
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/aging.103365
_version_ 1783555765334704128
author Mo, Jinglin
Chen, Zimo
Xu, Jie
Wang, Anxin
Meng, Xia
Zhao, Xingquan
Li, Hao
Wu, Shouling
Wang, Yongjun
author_facet Mo, Jinglin
Chen, Zimo
Xu, Jie
Wang, Anxin
Meng, Xia
Zhao, Xingquan
Li, Hao
Wu, Shouling
Wang, Yongjun
author_sort Mo, Jinglin
collection PubMed
description Background: This study aims to demonstrate the impact of the cumulative burden of low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (cumLDL-c) and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (cumhs-CRP) on cardiovascular risk. Results: During the 4.62 (±0.70) years of follow-up, 2,148 (5.92%) participants had MACE. Both of cumLDL-c and cumhs-CRP were independent risk factors for MACE. In participants without cumLDL-c during 2006-2013, the participants with cumhs-CRP had higher MACE risk during the subsequent 5 years, than those without cumhs-CRP (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.24, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.04-1.47). In addition, cumhs-CRP correlated with MACE in a cumhs-CRP level-dependent pattern. Conclusion: This study validated the effects of residual inflammation risk in patients with low LDL-c Level in a general population, using long-term burdens of hs-CRP or LDL-c other than a single time-point level. Method: The Kailuan study is a prospective, population-based study began in 2006. These total 36,421 participants completed 4 measurements of hs-CRP and LDL-c biennially from 2006-2013. Cumhs-CRP or cumLDL-c levels were calculated as the number of interval years multiplied by the Δhs-CRP (more than 2.0 mg/L) or ΔLDL-c (more than 2.6 mmol/L). Outcomes measured during follow-up (2012-2017) were defined as major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7343474
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Impact Journals
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73434742020-07-15 The impact of the cumulative burden of LDL-c and hs-CRP on cardiovascular risk: a prospective, population-based study Mo, Jinglin Chen, Zimo Xu, Jie Wang, Anxin Meng, Xia Zhao, Xingquan Li, Hao Wu, Shouling Wang, Yongjun Aging (Albany NY) Research Paper Background: This study aims to demonstrate the impact of the cumulative burden of low density lipoprotein-cholesterol (cumLDL-c) and high sensitivity C-reactive protein (cumhs-CRP) on cardiovascular risk. Results: During the 4.62 (±0.70) years of follow-up, 2,148 (5.92%) participants had MACE. Both of cumLDL-c and cumhs-CRP were independent risk factors for MACE. In participants without cumLDL-c during 2006-2013, the participants with cumhs-CRP had higher MACE risk during the subsequent 5 years, than those without cumhs-CRP (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.24, 95% confidence interval [CI]:1.04-1.47). In addition, cumhs-CRP correlated with MACE in a cumhs-CRP level-dependent pattern. Conclusion: This study validated the effects of residual inflammation risk in patients with low LDL-c Level in a general population, using long-term burdens of hs-CRP or LDL-c other than a single time-point level. Method: The Kailuan study is a prospective, population-based study began in 2006. These total 36,421 participants completed 4 measurements of hs-CRP and LDL-c biennially from 2006-2013. Cumhs-CRP or cumLDL-c levels were calculated as the number of interval years multiplied by the Δhs-CRP (more than 2.0 mg/L) or ΔLDL-c (more than 2.6 mmol/L). Outcomes measured during follow-up (2012-2017) were defined as major adverse cardiac events (MACE), including ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, and all-cause mortality. Impact Journals 2020-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7343474/ /pubmed/32544081 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/aging.103365 Text en Copyright © 2020 Mo et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Mo, Jinglin
Chen, Zimo
Xu, Jie
Wang, Anxin
Meng, Xia
Zhao, Xingquan
Li, Hao
Wu, Shouling
Wang, Yongjun
The impact of the cumulative burden of LDL-c and hs-CRP on cardiovascular risk: a prospective, population-based study
title The impact of the cumulative burden of LDL-c and hs-CRP on cardiovascular risk: a prospective, population-based study
title_full The impact of the cumulative burden of LDL-c and hs-CRP on cardiovascular risk: a prospective, population-based study
title_fullStr The impact of the cumulative burden of LDL-c and hs-CRP on cardiovascular risk: a prospective, population-based study
title_full_unstemmed The impact of the cumulative burden of LDL-c and hs-CRP on cardiovascular risk: a prospective, population-based study
title_short The impact of the cumulative burden of LDL-c and hs-CRP on cardiovascular risk: a prospective, population-based study
title_sort impact of the cumulative burden of ldl-c and hs-crp on cardiovascular risk: a prospective, population-based study
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7343474/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32544081
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/aging.103365
work_keys_str_mv AT mojinglin theimpactofthecumulativeburdenofldlcandhscrponcardiovascularriskaprospectivepopulationbasedstudy
AT chenzimo theimpactofthecumulativeburdenofldlcandhscrponcardiovascularriskaprospectivepopulationbasedstudy
AT xujie theimpactofthecumulativeburdenofldlcandhscrponcardiovascularriskaprospectivepopulationbasedstudy
AT wanganxin theimpactofthecumulativeburdenofldlcandhscrponcardiovascularriskaprospectivepopulationbasedstudy
AT mengxia theimpactofthecumulativeburdenofldlcandhscrponcardiovascularriskaprospectivepopulationbasedstudy
AT zhaoxingquan theimpactofthecumulativeburdenofldlcandhscrponcardiovascularriskaprospectivepopulationbasedstudy
AT lihao theimpactofthecumulativeburdenofldlcandhscrponcardiovascularriskaprospectivepopulationbasedstudy
AT wushouling theimpactofthecumulativeburdenofldlcandhscrponcardiovascularriskaprospectivepopulationbasedstudy
AT wangyongjun theimpactofthecumulativeburdenofldlcandhscrponcardiovascularriskaprospectivepopulationbasedstudy
AT mojinglin impactofthecumulativeburdenofldlcandhscrponcardiovascularriskaprospectivepopulationbasedstudy
AT chenzimo impactofthecumulativeburdenofldlcandhscrponcardiovascularriskaprospectivepopulationbasedstudy
AT xujie impactofthecumulativeburdenofldlcandhscrponcardiovascularriskaprospectivepopulationbasedstudy
AT wanganxin impactofthecumulativeburdenofldlcandhscrponcardiovascularriskaprospectivepopulationbasedstudy
AT mengxia impactofthecumulativeburdenofldlcandhscrponcardiovascularriskaprospectivepopulationbasedstudy
AT zhaoxingquan impactofthecumulativeburdenofldlcandhscrponcardiovascularriskaprospectivepopulationbasedstudy
AT lihao impactofthecumulativeburdenofldlcandhscrponcardiovascularriskaprospectivepopulationbasedstudy
AT wushouling impactofthecumulativeburdenofldlcandhscrponcardiovascularriskaprospectivepopulationbasedstudy
AT wangyongjun impactofthecumulativeburdenofldlcandhscrponcardiovascularriskaprospectivepopulationbasedstudy