Cargando…

Ultrasound guidance and risk for intravascular catheter-related infections among peripheral arterial catheters: a post-hoc analysis of two large randomized-controlled trials

BACKGROUND: The impact on infectious risk of ultrasound guidance at insertion remains controversial in short-term arterial catheters (ACs). The present study investigated the association between ultrasound guidance (US) during AC insertion and major catheter-related infections (MCRI), catheter-relat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Buetti, Niccolò, Ruckly, Stéphane, Lucet, Jean-Christophe, Bouadma, Lila, Schwebel, Carole, Mimoz, Olivier, Timsit, Jean-François
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7343671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32643100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00705-4
_version_ 1783555797794422784
author Buetti, Niccolò
Ruckly, Stéphane
Lucet, Jean-Christophe
Bouadma, Lila
Schwebel, Carole
Mimoz, Olivier
Timsit, Jean-François
author_facet Buetti, Niccolò
Ruckly, Stéphane
Lucet, Jean-Christophe
Bouadma, Lila
Schwebel, Carole
Mimoz, Olivier
Timsit, Jean-François
author_sort Buetti, Niccolò
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The impact on infectious risk of ultrasound guidance at insertion remains controversial in short-term arterial catheters (ACs). The present study investigated the association between ultrasound guidance (US) during AC insertion and major catheter-related infections (MCRI), catheter-related bloodstream infections (CR-BSI) or colonization, using univariate and multivariate marginal Cox model for clustered data. The skin colonization at catheter removal was evaluated to explain our results. RESULTS: We used individual data from two multicenter randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) that included a total of 3029 patients, 10 ICUs and 3950 ACs. US guidance was used for 386 (9.8%) catheter placements. In the univariate Cox model analysis, AC insertion with US versus without US exhibited similar risks for MCRI (HR 0.86, CI 95% 0.27–2.72, p = 0.79), CR-BSI (HR 0.87, CI 95% 0.20–3.72, p = 0.85) and catheter colonization (HR 1.31, CI 95% 0.92–1.86, p = 0.13). After adjustment on confounders, risks associated with US guidance remained similar versus non-US for MCRI (HR 0.71, CI 95% 0.23–2.24, p = 0.56), CR-BSI (HR 0.71, CI 95% 0.17–3.00, p = 0.63) and catheter colonization (HR 0.92, CI 95% 0.63–1.34, p = 0.67). No differences between US and non-US for MCRI, CR-BSI and colonization were observed according to the insertion site, radial or femoral. At catheter removal, the skin colonization was similar between US and non-US groups (p = 0.69). CONCLUSIONS: Using the largest dataset ever collected from large multi-centric RCTs conducted with relatively consistent insertion and maintenance catheter protocols, we showed that the risk of infectious complications for ACs inserted under US guidance is not superior compared to those inserted without US guidance. Trial registration These studies were registered within ClinicalTrials.gov (numbers NCT01629550 and NCT 01189682).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7343671
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73436712020-07-13 Ultrasound guidance and risk for intravascular catheter-related infections among peripheral arterial catheters: a post-hoc analysis of two large randomized-controlled trials Buetti, Niccolò Ruckly, Stéphane Lucet, Jean-Christophe Bouadma, Lila Schwebel, Carole Mimoz, Olivier Timsit, Jean-François Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: The impact on infectious risk of ultrasound guidance at insertion remains controversial in short-term arterial catheters (ACs). The present study investigated the association between ultrasound guidance (US) during AC insertion and major catheter-related infections (MCRI), catheter-related bloodstream infections (CR-BSI) or colonization, using univariate and multivariate marginal Cox model for clustered data. The skin colonization at catheter removal was evaluated to explain our results. RESULTS: We used individual data from two multicenter randomized-controlled trials (RCTs) that included a total of 3029 patients, 10 ICUs and 3950 ACs. US guidance was used for 386 (9.8%) catheter placements. In the univariate Cox model analysis, AC insertion with US versus without US exhibited similar risks for MCRI (HR 0.86, CI 95% 0.27–2.72, p = 0.79), CR-BSI (HR 0.87, CI 95% 0.20–3.72, p = 0.85) and catheter colonization (HR 1.31, CI 95% 0.92–1.86, p = 0.13). After adjustment on confounders, risks associated with US guidance remained similar versus non-US for MCRI (HR 0.71, CI 95% 0.23–2.24, p = 0.56), CR-BSI (HR 0.71, CI 95% 0.17–3.00, p = 0.63) and catheter colonization (HR 0.92, CI 95% 0.63–1.34, p = 0.67). No differences between US and non-US for MCRI, CR-BSI and colonization were observed according to the insertion site, radial or femoral. At catheter removal, the skin colonization was similar between US and non-US groups (p = 0.69). CONCLUSIONS: Using the largest dataset ever collected from large multi-centric RCTs conducted with relatively consistent insertion and maintenance catheter protocols, we showed that the risk of infectious complications for ACs inserted under US guidance is not superior compared to those inserted without US guidance. Trial registration These studies were registered within ClinicalTrials.gov (numbers NCT01629550 and NCT 01189682). Springer International Publishing 2020-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7343671/ /pubmed/32643100 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00705-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Buetti, Niccolò
Ruckly, Stéphane
Lucet, Jean-Christophe
Bouadma, Lila
Schwebel, Carole
Mimoz, Olivier
Timsit, Jean-François
Ultrasound guidance and risk for intravascular catheter-related infections among peripheral arterial catheters: a post-hoc analysis of two large randomized-controlled trials
title Ultrasound guidance and risk for intravascular catheter-related infections among peripheral arterial catheters: a post-hoc analysis of two large randomized-controlled trials
title_full Ultrasound guidance and risk for intravascular catheter-related infections among peripheral arterial catheters: a post-hoc analysis of two large randomized-controlled trials
title_fullStr Ultrasound guidance and risk for intravascular catheter-related infections among peripheral arterial catheters: a post-hoc analysis of two large randomized-controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Ultrasound guidance and risk for intravascular catheter-related infections among peripheral arterial catheters: a post-hoc analysis of two large randomized-controlled trials
title_short Ultrasound guidance and risk for intravascular catheter-related infections among peripheral arterial catheters: a post-hoc analysis of two large randomized-controlled trials
title_sort ultrasound guidance and risk for intravascular catheter-related infections among peripheral arterial catheters: a post-hoc analysis of two large randomized-controlled trials
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7343671/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32643100
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00705-4
work_keys_str_mv AT buettiniccolo ultrasoundguidanceandriskforintravascularcatheterrelatedinfectionsamongperipheralarterialcathetersaposthocanalysisoftwolargerandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT rucklystephane ultrasoundguidanceandriskforintravascularcatheterrelatedinfectionsamongperipheralarterialcathetersaposthocanalysisoftwolargerandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT lucetjeanchristophe ultrasoundguidanceandriskforintravascularcatheterrelatedinfectionsamongperipheralarterialcathetersaposthocanalysisoftwolargerandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT bouadmalila ultrasoundguidanceandriskforintravascularcatheterrelatedinfectionsamongperipheralarterialcathetersaposthocanalysisoftwolargerandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT schwebelcarole ultrasoundguidanceandriskforintravascularcatheterrelatedinfectionsamongperipheralarterialcathetersaposthocanalysisoftwolargerandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT mimozolivier ultrasoundguidanceandriskforintravascularcatheterrelatedinfectionsamongperipheralarterialcathetersaposthocanalysisoftwolargerandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT timsitjeanfrancois ultrasoundguidanceandriskforintravascularcatheterrelatedinfectionsamongperipheralarterialcathetersaposthocanalysisoftwolargerandomizedcontrolledtrials