Cargando…

Comparison of the proximal and distal approaches for axillary vein catheterization under ultrasound guidance (PANDA) in cardiac surgery patients susceptible to bleeding: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed at comparing the success rate and safety of proximal versus distal approach for ultrasound (US)-guided axillary vein catheterization (AVC) in cardiac surgery patients susceptible to bleeding. METHODS: In this single-center randomized controlled trial, cardiac surg...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Su, Ying, Hou, Jun-yi, Ma, Guo-guang, Hao, Guang-wei, Luo, Jing-chao, Yu, Shen-ji, Liu, Kai, Zheng, Ji-li, Xue, Yan, Luo, Zhe, Tu, Guo-wei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7343682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32643012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00703-6
_version_ 1783555799428104192
author Su, Ying
Hou, Jun-yi
Ma, Guo-guang
Hao, Guang-wei
Luo, Jing-chao
Yu, Shen-ji
Liu, Kai
Zheng, Ji-li
Xue, Yan
Luo, Zhe
Tu, Guo-wei
author_facet Su, Ying
Hou, Jun-yi
Ma, Guo-guang
Hao, Guang-wei
Luo, Jing-chao
Yu, Shen-ji
Liu, Kai
Zheng, Ji-li
Xue, Yan
Luo, Zhe
Tu, Guo-wei
author_sort Su, Ying
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The present study aimed at comparing the success rate and safety of proximal versus distal approach for ultrasound (US)-guided axillary vein catheterization (AVC) in cardiac surgery patients susceptible to bleeding. METHODS: In this single-center randomized controlled trial, cardiac surgery patients susceptible to bleeding and requiring AVC were randomized to either the proximal or distal approach group for US-guided AVC. Patients susceptible to bleeding were defined as those who received oral antiplatelet drugs or anticoagulants for at least 3 days. Success rate, catheterization time, number of attempts, and mechanical complications within 24 h were recorded for each procedure. RESULTS: A total of 198 patients underwent randomization: 99 patients each to the proximal and distal groups. The proximal group had the higher first puncture success rate (75.8% vs. 51.5%, p < 0.001) and site success rate (93.9% vs. 83.8%, p = 0.04) than the distal group. However, the overall success rates between the two groups were similar (99.0% vs. 99.0%; p = 1.00). Moreover, the proximal group had fewer average number of attempts (p < 0.01), less access time (p < 0.001), and less successful cannulation time (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in complications between the two groups, such as major bleeding, minor bleeding, arterial puncture, pneumothorax, nerve injuries, and catheter misplacements. CONCLUSIONS: For cardiac surgery patients susceptible to bleeding, both proximal and distal approaches for US-guided AVC can be considered as feasible and safe methods of central venous cannulation. In terms of the first puncture success rate and cannulation time, the proximal approach is superior to the distal approach. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03395691. Registered January 10, 2018, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03395691?cond=NCT03395691&draw=1&rank=1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7343682
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73436822020-07-13 Comparison of the proximal and distal approaches for axillary vein catheterization under ultrasound guidance (PANDA) in cardiac surgery patients susceptible to bleeding: a randomized controlled trial Su, Ying Hou, Jun-yi Ma, Guo-guang Hao, Guang-wei Luo, Jing-chao Yu, Shen-ji Liu, Kai Zheng, Ji-li Xue, Yan Luo, Zhe Tu, Guo-wei Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: The present study aimed at comparing the success rate and safety of proximal versus distal approach for ultrasound (US)-guided axillary vein catheterization (AVC) in cardiac surgery patients susceptible to bleeding. METHODS: In this single-center randomized controlled trial, cardiac surgery patients susceptible to bleeding and requiring AVC were randomized to either the proximal or distal approach group for US-guided AVC. Patients susceptible to bleeding were defined as those who received oral antiplatelet drugs or anticoagulants for at least 3 days. Success rate, catheterization time, number of attempts, and mechanical complications within 24 h were recorded for each procedure. RESULTS: A total of 198 patients underwent randomization: 99 patients each to the proximal and distal groups. The proximal group had the higher first puncture success rate (75.8% vs. 51.5%, p < 0.001) and site success rate (93.9% vs. 83.8%, p = 0.04) than the distal group. However, the overall success rates between the two groups were similar (99.0% vs. 99.0%; p = 1.00). Moreover, the proximal group had fewer average number of attempts (p < 0.01), less access time (p < 0.001), and less successful cannulation time (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in complications between the two groups, such as major bleeding, minor bleeding, arterial puncture, pneumothorax, nerve injuries, and catheter misplacements. CONCLUSIONS: For cardiac surgery patients susceptible to bleeding, both proximal and distal approaches for US-guided AVC can be considered as feasible and safe methods of central venous cannulation. In terms of the first puncture success rate and cannulation time, the proximal approach is superior to the distal approach. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03395691. Registered January 10, 2018, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03395691?cond=NCT03395691&draw=1&rank=1. Springer International Publishing 2020-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7343682/ /pubmed/32643012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00703-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Su, Ying
Hou, Jun-yi
Ma, Guo-guang
Hao, Guang-wei
Luo, Jing-chao
Yu, Shen-ji
Liu, Kai
Zheng, Ji-li
Xue, Yan
Luo, Zhe
Tu, Guo-wei
Comparison of the proximal and distal approaches for axillary vein catheterization under ultrasound guidance (PANDA) in cardiac surgery patients susceptible to bleeding: a randomized controlled trial
title Comparison of the proximal and distal approaches for axillary vein catheterization under ultrasound guidance (PANDA) in cardiac surgery patients susceptible to bleeding: a randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparison of the proximal and distal approaches for axillary vein catheterization under ultrasound guidance (PANDA) in cardiac surgery patients susceptible to bleeding: a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison of the proximal and distal approaches for axillary vein catheterization under ultrasound guidance (PANDA) in cardiac surgery patients susceptible to bleeding: a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the proximal and distal approaches for axillary vein catheterization under ultrasound guidance (PANDA) in cardiac surgery patients susceptible to bleeding: a randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparison of the proximal and distal approaches for axillary vein catheterization under ultrasound guidance (PANDA) in cardiac surgery patients susceptible to bleeding: a randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparison of the proximal and distal approaches for axillary vein catheterization under ultrasound guidance (panda) in cardiac surgery patients susceptible to bleeding: a randomized controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7343682/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32643012
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00703-6
work_keys_str_mv AT suying comparisonoftheproximalanddistalapproachesforaxillaryveincatheterizationunderultrasoundguidancepandaincardiacsurgerypatientssusceptibletobleedingarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT houjunyi comparisonoftheproximalanddistalapproachesforaxillaryveincatheterizationunderultrasoundguidancepandaincardiacsurgerypatientssusceptibletobleedingarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT maguoguang comparisonoftheproximalanddistalapproachesforaxillaryveincatheterizationunderultrasoundguidancepandaincardiacsurgerypatientssusceptibletobleedingarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT haoguangwei comparisonoftheproximalanddistalapproachesforaxillaryveincatheterizationunderultrasoundguidancepandaincardiacsurgerypatientssusceptibletobleedingarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT luojingchao comparisonoftheproximalanddistalapproachesforaxillaryveincatheterizationunderultrasoundguidancepandaincardiacsurgerypatientssusceptibletobleedingarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yushenji comparisonoftheproximalanddistalapproachesforaxillaryveincatheterizationunderultrasoundguidancepandaincardiacsurgerypatientssusceptibletobleedingarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT liukai comparisonoftheproximalanddistalapproachesforaxillaryveincatheterizationunderultrasoundguidancepandaincardiacsurgerypatientssusceptibletobleedingarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT zhengjili comparisonoftheproximalanddistalapproachesforaxillaryveincatheterizationunderultrasoundguidancepandaincardiacsurgerypatientssusceptibletobleedingarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT xueyan comparisonoftheproximalanddistalapproachesforaxillaryveincatheterizationunderultrasoundguidancepandaincardiacsurgerypatientssusceptibletobleedingarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT luozhe comparisonoftheproximalanddistalapproachesforaxillaryveincatheterizationunderultrasoundguidancepandaincardiacsurgerypatientssusceptibletobleedingarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tuguowei comparisonoftheproximalanddistalapproachesforaxillaryveincatheterizationunderultrasoundguidancepandaincardiacsurgerypatientssusceptibletobleedingarandomizedcontrolledtrial