Cargando…
Comparison of the proximal and distal approaches for axillary vein catheterization under ultrasound guidance (PANDA) in cardiac surgery patients susceptible to bleeding: a randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: The present study aimed at comparing the success rate and safety of proximal versus distal approach for ultrasound (US)-guided axillary vein catheterization (AVC) in cardiac surgery patients susceptible to bleeding. METHODS: In this single-center randomized controlled trial, cardiac surg...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7343682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32643012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00703-6 |
_version_ | 1783555799428104192 |
---|---|
author | Su, Ying Hou, Jun-yi Ma, Guo-guang Hao, Guang-wei Luo, Jing-chao Yu, Shen-ji Liu, Kai Zheng, Ji-li Xue, Yan Luo, Zhe Tu, Guo-wei |
author_facet | Su, Ying Hou, Jun-yi Ma, Guo-guang Hao, Guang-wei Luo, Jing-chao Yu, Shen-ji Liu, Kai Zheng, Ji-li Xue, Yan Luo, Zhe Tu, Guo-wei |
author_sort | Su, Ying |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The present study aimed at comparing the success rate and safety of proximal versus distal approach for ultrasound (US)-guided axillary vein catheterization (AVC) in cardiac surgery patients susceptible to bleeding. METHODS: In this single-center randomized controlled trial, cardiac surgery patients susceptible to bleeding and requiring AVC were randomized to either the proximal or distal approach group for US-guided AVC. Patients susceptible to bleeding were defined as those who received oral antiplatelet drugs or anticoagulants for at least 3 days. Success rate, catheterization time, number of attempts, and mechanical complications within 24 h were recorded for each procedure. RESULTS: A total of 198 patients underwent randomization: 99 patients each to the proximal and distal groups. The proximal group had the higher first puncture success rate (75.8% vs. 51.5%, p < 0.001) and site success rate (93.9% vs. 83.8%, p = 0.04) than the distal group. However, the overall success rates between the two groups were similar (99.0% vs. 99.0%; p = 1.00). Moreover, the proximal group had fewer average number of attempts (p < 0.01), less access time (p < 0.001), and less successful cannulation time (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in complications between the two groups, such as major bleeding, minor bleeding, arterial puncture, pneumothorax, nerve injuries, and catheter misplacements. CONCLUSIONS: For cardiac surgery patients susceptible to bleeding, both proximal and distal approaches for US-guided AVC can be considered as feasible and safe methods of central venous cannulation. In terms of the first puncture success rate and cannulation time, the proximal approach is superior to the distal approach. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03395691. Registered January 10, 2018, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03395691?cond=NCT03395691&draw=1&rank=1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7343682 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73436822020-07-13 Comparison of the proximal and distal approaches for axillary vein catheterization under ultrasound guidance (PANDA) in cardiac surgery patients susceptible to bleeding: a randomized controlled trial Su, Ying Hou, Jun-yi Ma, Guo-guang Hao, Guang-wei Luo, Jing-chao Yu, Shen-ji Liu, Kai Zheng, Ji-li Xue, Yan Luo, Zhe Tu, Guo-wei Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: The present study aimed at comparing the success rate and safety of proximal versus distal approach for ultrasound (US)-guided axillary vein catheterization (AVC) in cardiac surgery patients susceptible to bleeding. METHODS: In this single-center randomized controlled trial, cardiac surgery patients susceptible to bleeding and requiring AVC were randomized to either the proximal or distal approach group for US-guided AVC. Patients susceptible to bleeding were defined as those who received oral antiplatelet drugs or anticoagulants for at least 3 days. Success rate, catheterization time, number of attempts, and mechanical complications within 24 h were recorded for each procedure. RESULTS: A total of 198 patients underwent randomization: 99 patients each to the proximal and distal groups. The proximal group had the higher first puncture success rate (75.8% vs. 51.5%, p < 0.001) and site success rate (93.9% vs. 83.8%, p = 0.04) than the distal group. However, the overall success rates between the two groups were similar (99.0% vs. 99.0%; p = 1.00). Moreover, the proximal group had fewer average number of attempts (p < 0.01), less access time (p < 0.001), and less successful cannulation time (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in complications between the two groups, such as major bleeding, minor bleeding, arterial puncture, pneumothorax, nerve injuries, and catheter misplacements. CONCLUSIONS: For cardiac surgery patients susceptible to bleeding, both proximal and distal approaches for US-guided AVC can be considered as feasible and safe methods of central venous cannulation. In terms of the first puncture success rate and cannulation time, the proximal approach is superior to the distal approach. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03395691. Registered January 10, 2018, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03395691?cond=NCT03395691&draw=1&rank=1. Springer International Publishing 2020-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7343682/ /pubmed/32643012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00703-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Su, Ying Hou, Jun-yi Ma, Guo-guang Hao, Guang-wei Luo, Jing-chao Yu, Shen-ji Liu, Kai Zheng, Ji-li Xue, Yan Luo, Zhe Tu, Guo-wei Comparison of the proximal and distal approaches for axillary vein catheterization under ultrasound guidance (PANDA) in cardiac surgery patients susceptible to bleeding: a randomized controlled trial |
title | Comparison of the proximal and distal approaches for axillary vein catheterization under ultrasound guidance (PANDA) in cardiac surgery patients susceptible to bleeding: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Comparison of the proximal and distal approaches for axillary vein catheterization under ultrasound guidance (PANDA) in cardiac surgery patients susceptible to bleeding: a randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the proximal and distal approaches for axillary vein catheterization under ultrasound guidance (PANDA) in cardiac surgery patients susceptible to bleeding: a randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the proximal and distal approaches for axillary vein catheterization under ultrasound guidance (PANDA) in cardiac surgery patients susceptible to bleeding: a randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Comparison of the proximal and distal approaches for axillary vein catheterization under ultrasound guidance (PANDA) in cardiac surgery patients susceptible to bleeding: a randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | comparison of the proximal and distal approaches for axillary vein catheterization under ultrasound guidance (panda) in cardiac surgery patients susceptible to bleeding: a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7343682/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32643012 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00703-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT suying comparisonoftheproximalanddistalapproachesforaxillaryveincatheterizationunderultrasoundguidancepandaincardiacsurgerypatientssusceptibletobleedingarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT houjunyi comparisonoftheproximalanddistalapproachesforaxillaryveincatheterizationunderultrasoundguidancepandaincardiacsurgerypatientssusceptibletobleedingarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT maguoguang comparisonoftheproximalanddistalapproachesforaxillaryveincatheterizationunderultrasoundguidancepandaincardiacsurgerypatientssusceptibletobleedingarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT haoguangwei comparisonoftheproximalanddistalapproachesforaxillaryveincatheterizationunderultrasoundguidancepandaincardiacsurgerypatientssusceptibletobleedingarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT luojingchao comparisonoftheproximalanddistalapproachesforaxillaryveincatheterizationunderultrasoundguidancepandaincardiacsurgerypatientssusceptibletobleedingarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT yushenji comparisonoftheproximalanddistalapproachesforaxillaryveincatheterizationunderultrasoundguidancepandaincardiacsurgerypatientssusceptibletobleedingarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT liukai comparisonoftheproximalanddistalapproachesforaxillaryveincatheterizationunderultrasoundguidancepandaincardiacsurgerypatientssusceptibletobleedingarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT zhengjili comparisonoftheproximalanddistalapproachesforaxillaryveincatheterizationunderultrasoundguidancepandaincardiacsurgerypatientssusceptibletobleedingarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT xueyan comparisonoftheproximalanddistalapproachesforaxillaryveincatheterizationunderultrasoundguidancepandaincardiacsurgerypatientssusceptibletobleedingarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT luozhe comparisonoftheproximalanddistalapproachesforaxillaryveincatheterizationunderultrasoundguidancepandaincardiacsurgerypatientssusceptibletobleedingarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT tuguowei comparisonoftheproximalanddistalapproachesforaxillaryveincatheterizationunderultrasoundguidancepandaincardiacsurgerypatientssusceptibletobleedingarandomizedcontrolledtrial |