Cargando…

Kinfitr — an open-source tool for reproducible PET modelling: validation and evaluation of test-retest reliability

BACKGROUND: In positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, binding is typically estimated by fitting pharmacokinetic models to the series of measurements of radioactivity in the target tissue following intravenous injection of a radioligand. However, there are multiple different models to choose fro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tjerkaski, Jonathan, Cervenka, Simon, Farde, Lars, Matheson, Granville James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7343683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32642865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-00664-8
_version_ 1783555799678713856
author Tjerkaski, Jonathan
Cervenka, Simon
Farde, Lars
Matheson, Granville James
author_facet Tjerkaski, Jonathan
Cervenka, Simon
Farde, Lars
Matheson, Granville James
author_sort Tjerkaski, Jonathan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, binding is typically estimated by fitting pharmacokinetic models to the series of measurements of radioactivity in the target tissue following intravenous injection of a radioligand. However, there are multiple different models to choose from and numerous analytical decisions that must be made when modelling PET data. Therefore, it is important that analysis tools be adapted to the specific circumstances, and that analyses be documented in a transparent manner. Kinfitr, written in the open-source programming language R, is a tool developed for flexible and reproducible kinetic modelling of PET data, i.e. performing all steps using code which can be publicly shared in analysis notebooks. In this study, we compared outcomes obtained using kinfitr with those obtained using PMOD: a widely used commercial tool. RESULTS: Using previously collected test-retest data obtained with four different radioligands, a total of six different kinetic models were fitted to time-activity curves derived from different brain regions. We observed good correspondence between the two kinetic modelling tools both for binding estimates and for microparameters. Likewise, no substantial differences were observed in the test-retest reliability estimates between the two tools. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, we showed excellent agreement between the open-source R package kinfitr, and the widely used commercial application PMOD. We, therefore, conclude that kinfitr is a valid and reliable tool for kinetic modelling of PET data.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7343683
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73436832020-07-13 Kinfitr — an open-source tool for reproducible PET modelling: validation and evaluation of test-retest reliability Tjerkaski, Jonathan Cervenka, Simon Farde, Lars Matheson, Granville James EJNMMI Res Original Research BACKGROUND: In positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, binding is typically estimated by fitting pharmacokinetic models to the series of measurements of radioactivity in the target tissue following intravenous injection of a radioligand. However, there are multiple different models to choose from and numerous analytical decisions that must be made when modelling PET data. Therefore, it is important that analysis tools be adapted to the specific circumstances, and that analyses be documented in a transparent manner. Kinfitr, written in the open-source programming language R, is a tool developed for flexible and reproducible kinetic modelling of PET data, i.e. performing all steps using code which can be publicly shared in analysis notebooks. In this study, we compared outcomes obtained using kinfitr with those obtained using PMOD: a widely used commercial tool. RESULTS: Using previously collected test-retest data obtained with four different radioligands, a total of six different kinetic models were fitted to time-activity curves derived from different brain regions. We observed good correspondence between the two kinetic modelling tools both for binding estimates and for microparameters. Likewise, no substantial differences were observed in the test-retest reliability estimates between the two tools. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, we showed excellent agreement between the open-source R package kinfitr, and the widely used commercial application PMOD. We, therefore, conclude that kinfitr is a valid and reliable tool for kinetic modelling of PET data. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7343683/ /pubmed/32642865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-00664-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Research
Tjerkaski, Jonathan
Cervenka, Simon
Farde, Lars
Matheson, Granville James
Kinfitr — an open-source tool for reproducible PET modelling: validation and evaluation of test-retest reliability
title Kinfitr — an open-source tool for reproducible PET modelling: validation and evaluation of test-retest reliability
title_full Kinfitr — an open-source tool for reproducible PET modelling: validation and evaluation of test-retest reliability
title_fullStr Kinfitr — an open-source tool for reproducible PET modelling: validation and evaluation of test-retest reliability
title_full_unstemmed Kinfitr — an open-source tool for reproducible PET modelling: validation and evaluation of test-retest reliability
title_short Kinfitr — an open-source tool for reproducible PET modelling: validation and evaluation of test-retest reliability
title_sort kinfitr — an open-source tool for reproducible pet modelling: validation and evaluation of test-retest reliability
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7343683/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32642865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-00664-8
work_keys_str_mv AT tjerkaskijonathan kinfitranopensourcetoolforreproduciblepetmodellingvalidationandevaluationoftestretestreliability
AT cervenkasimon kinfitranopensourcetoolforreproduciblepetmodellingvalidationandevaluationoftestretestreliability
AT fardelars kinfitranopensourcetoolforreproduciblepetmodellingvalidationandevaluationoftestretestreliability
AT mathesongranvillejames kinfitranopensourcetoolforreproduciblepetmodellingvalidationandevaluationoftestretestreliability