Cargando…
Kinfitr — an open-source tool for reproducible PET modelling: validation and evaluation of test-retest reliability
BACKGROUND: In positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, binding is typically estimated by fitting pharmacokinetic models to the series of measurements of radioactivity in the target tissue following intravenous injection of a radioligand. However, there are multiple different models to choose fro...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7343683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32642865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-00664-8 |
_version_ | 1783555799678713856 |
---|---|
author | Tjerkaski, Jonathan Cervenka, Simon Farde, Lars Matheson, Granville James |
author_facet | Tjerkaski, Jonathan Cervenka, Simon Farde, Lars Matheson, Granville James |
author_sort | Tjerkaski, Jonathan |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: In positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, binding is typically estimated by fitting pharmacokinetic models to the series of measurements of radioactivity in the target tissue following intravenous injection of a radioligand. However, there are multiple different models to choose from and numerous analytical decisions that must be made when modelling PET data. Therefore, it is important that analysis tools be adapted to the specific circumstances, and that analyses be documented in a transparent manner. Kinfitr, written in the open-source programming language R, is a tool developed for flexible and reproducible kinetic modelling of PET data, i.e. performing all steps using code which can be publicly shared in analysis notebooks. In this study, we compared outcomes obtained using kinfitr with those obtained using PMOD: a widely used commercial tool. RESULTS: Using previously collected test-retest data obtained with four different radioligands, a total of six different kinetic models were fitted to time-activity curves derived from different brain regions. We observed good correspondence between the two kinetic modelling tools both for binding estimates and for microparameters. Likewise, no substantial differences were observed in the test-retest reliability estimates between the two tools. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, we showed excellent agreement between the open-source R package kinfitr, and the widely used commercial application PMOD. We, therefore, conclude that kinfitr is a valid and reliable tool for kinetic modelling of PET data. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7343683 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73436832020-07-13 Kinfitr — an open-source tool for reproducible PET modelling: validation and evaluation of test-retest reliability Tjerkaski, Jonathan Cervenka, Simon Farde, Lars Matheson, Granville James EJNMMI Res Original Research BACKGROUND: In positron emission tomography (PET) imaging, binding is typically estimated by fitting pharmacokinetic models to the series of measurements of radioactivity in the target tissue following intravenous injection of a radioligand. However, there are multiple different models to choose from and numerous analytical decisions that must be made when modelling PET data. Therefore, it is important that analysis tools be adapted to the specific circumstances, and that analyses be documented in a transparent manner. Kinfitr, written in the open-source programming language R, is a tool developed for flexible and reproducible kinetic modelling of PET data, i.e. performing all steps using code which can be publicly shared in analysis notebooks. In this study, we compared outcomes obtained using kinfitr with those obtained using PMOD: a widely used commercial tool. RESULTS: Using previously collected test-retest data obtained with four different radioligands, a total of six different kinetic models were fitted to time-activity curves derived from different brain regions. We observed good correspondence between the two kinetic modelling tools both for binding estimates and for microparameters. Likewise, no substantial differences were observed in the test-retest reliability estimates between the two tools. CONCLUSIONS: In summary, we showed excellent agreement between the open-source R package kinfitr, and the widely used commercial application PMOD. We, therefore, conclude that kinfitr is a valid and reliable tool for kinetic modelling of PET data. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7343683/ /pubmed/32642865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-00664-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Tjerkaski, Jonathan Cervenka, Simon Farde, Lars Matheson, Granville James Kinfitr — an open-source tool for reproducible PET modelling: validation and evaluation of test-retest reliability |
title | Kinfitr — an open-source tool for reproducible PET modelling: validation and evaluation of test-retest reliability |
title_full | Kinfitr — an open-source tool for reproducible PET modelling: validation and evaluation of test-retest reliability |
title_fullStr | Kinfitr — an open-source tool for reproducible PET modelling: validation and evaluation of test-retest reliability |
title_full_unstemmed | Kinfitr — an open-source tool for reproducible PET modelling: validation and evaluation of test-retest reliability |
title_short | Kinfitr — an open-source tool for reproducible PET modelling: validation and evaluation of test-retest reliability |
title_sort | kinfitr — an open-source tool for reproducible pet modelling: validation and evaluation of test-retest reliability |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7343683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32642865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13550-020-00664-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT tjerkaskijonathan kinfitranopensourcetoolforreproduciblepetmodellingvalidationandevaluationoftestretestreliability AT cervenkasimon kinfitranopensourcetoolforreproduciblepetmodellingvalidationandevaluationoftestretestreliability AT fardelars kinfitranopensourcetoolforreproduciblepetmodellingvalidationandevaluationoftestretestreliability AT mathesongranvillejames kinfitranopensourcetoolforreproduciblepetmodellingvalidationandevaluationoftestretestreliability |