Cargando…

Post-transplant inflow modulation for early allograft dysfunction after living donor liver transplantation

BACKGROUND: To treat small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), many procedures were described for portal flow modulation before, during, or after transplantation. The selection of the procedure as well as the best timing remains controversial. CASE PRESENTATION:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Elshawy, Mohamed, Toshima, Takeo, Asayama, Yoshiki, Kubo, Yuichiro, Ikeda, Shinichiro, Ikegami, Toru, Arakaki, Shingo, Yoshizumi, Tomoharu, Mori, Masaki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7343689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32642985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40792-020-00897-8
_version_ 1783555800403279872
author Elshawy, Mohamed
Toshima, Takeo
Asayama, Yoshiki
Kubo, Yuichiro
Ikeda, Shinichiro
Ikegami, Toru
Arakaki, Shingo
Yoshizumi, Tomoharu
Mori, Masaki
author_facet Elshawy, Mohamed
Toshima, Takeo
Asayama, Yoshiki
Kubo, Yuichiro
Ikeda, Shinichiro
Ikegami, Toru
Arakaki, Shingo
Yoshizumi, Tomoharu
Mori, Masaki
author_sort Elshawy, Mohamed
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To treat small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), many procedures were described for portal flow modulation before, during, or after transplantation. The selection of the procedure as well as the best timing remains controversial. CASE PRESENTATION: A 43-year-old female with end-stage liver disease underwent LDLT with extended left with caudate lobe graft from her donor who was her 41-year-old brother (graft volume/standard liver volume (GV/SLV), 35.7%; graft to recipient weight ratio (GRWR), 0.67%). During the surgery, splenectomy could not be performed owing to severe peri-splenic adhesions to avoid the ruined bleedings. The splenic artery ligation was not also completely done because it was dorsal to the pancreas and difficult to be approached. Finally, adequate portal vein (PV) inflow was confirmed after portal venous thrombectomy. As having post-transplant optional procedures that are accessible for PV flow modulation, any other procedures for PV modulation during LDLT were not done until the postoperative assessment of the graft function and PV flow for possible postoperative modulation of the portal flow accordingly. Postoperative PV flow kept as high as 30 cm/s. By the end of the 1st week, there was a progressive deterioration of the total bilirubin profile (peak as 19.4 mg/dL) and ascitic fluid amount exceeded 1000 mL/day. Therefore, splenic artery embolization was done effectively and safely on the 10th postoperative day (POD) to reverse early allograft dysfunction as PV flow significantly decreased to keep within 20 cm/s and serum total bilirubin levels gradually declined with decreased amounts of ascites below 500 mL on POD 11 and thereafter. The patient was discharged on POD 28 with good condition. CONCLUSIONS: SFSS can be prevented or reversed by the portal inflow modulation, even by post-transplant procedure. This case emphasizes that keeping accessible angiographic treatment options for PV modulation, such as splenic artery embolization, after LDLT is quite feasible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7343689
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73436892020-07-13 Post-transplant inflow modulation for early allograft dysfunction after living donor liver transplantation Elshawy, Mohamed Toshima, Takeo Asayama, Yoshiki Kubo, Yuichiro Ikeda, Shinichiro Ikegami, Toru Arakaki, Shingo Yoshizumi, Tomoharu Mori, Masaki Surg Case Rep Case Report BACKGROUND: To treat small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), many procedures were described for portal flow modulation before, during, or after transplantation. The selection of the procedure as well as the best timing remains controversial. CASE PRESENTATION: A 43-year-old female with end-stage liver disease underwent LDLT with extended left with caudate lobe graft from her donor who was her 41-year-old brother (graft volume/standard liver volume (GV/SLV), 35.7%; graft to recipient weight ratio (GRWR), 0.67%). During the surgery, splenectomy could not be performed owing to severe peri-splenic adhesions to avoid the ruined bleedings. The splenic artery ligation was not also completely done because it was dorsal to the pancreas and difficult to be approached. Finally, adequate portal vein (PV) inflow was confirmed after portal venous thrombectomy. As having post-transplant optional procedures that are accessible for PV flow modulation, any other procedures for PV modulation during LDLT were not done until the postoperative assessment of the graft function and PV flow for possible postoperative modulation of the portal flow accordingly. Postoperative PV flow kept as high as 30 cm/s. By the end of the 1st week, there was a progressive deterioration of the total bilirubin profile (peak as 19.4 mg/dL) and ascitic fluid amount exceeded 1000 mL/day. Therefore, splenic artery embolization was done effectively and safely on the 10th postoperative day (POD) to reverse early allograft dysfunction as PV flow significantly decreased to keep within 20 cm/s and serum total bilirubin levels gradually declined with decreased amounts of ascites below 500 mL on POD 11 and thereafter. The patient was discharged on POD 28 with good condition. CONCLUSIONS: SFSS can be prevented or reversed by the portal inflow modulation, even by post-transplant procedure. This case emphasizes that keeping accessible angiographic treatment options for PV modulation, such as splenic artery embolization, after LDLT is quite feasible. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7343689/ /pubmed/32642985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40792-020-00897-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Case Report
Elshawy, Mohamed
Toshima, Takeo
Asayama, Yoshiki
Kubo, Yuichiro
Ikeda, Shinichiro
Ikegami, Toru
Arakaki, Shingo
Yoshizumi, Tomoharu
Mori, Masaki
Post-transplant inflow modulation for early allograft dysfunction after living donor liver transplantation
title Post-transplant inflow modulation for early allograft dysfunction after living donor liver transplantation
title_full Post-transplant inflow modulation for early allograft dysfunction after living donor liver transplantation
title_fullStr Post-transplant inflow modulation for early allograft dysfunction after living donor liver transplantation
title_full_unstemmed Post-transplant inflow modulation for early allograft dysfunction after living donor liver transplantation
title_short Post-transplant inflow modulation for early allograft dysfunction after living donor liver transplantation
title_sort post-transplant inflow modulation for early allograft dysfunction after living donor liver transplantation
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7343689/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32642985
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40792-020-00897-8
work_keys_str_mv AT elshawymohamed posttransplantinflowmodulationforearlyallograftdysfunctionafterlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT toshimatakeo posttransplantinflowmodulationforearlyallograftdysfunctionafterlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT asayamayoshiki posttransplantinflowmodulationforearlyallograftdysfunctionafterlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT kuboyuichiro posttransplantinflowmodulationforearlyallograftdysfunctionafterlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT ikedashinichiro posttransplantinflowmodulationforearlyallograftdysfunctionafterlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT ikegamitoru posttransplantinflowmodulationforearlyallograftdysfunctionafterlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT arakakishingo posttransplantinflowmodulationforearlyallograftdysfunctionafterlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT yoshizumitomoharu posttransplantinflowmodulationforearlyallograftdysfunctionafterlivingdonorlivertransplantation
AT morimasaki posttransplantinflowmodulationforearlyallograftdysfunctionafterlivingdonorlivertransplantation