Cargando…
Post-transplant inflow modulation for early allograft dysfunction after living donor liver transplantation
BACKGROUND: To treat small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), many procedures were described for portal flow modulation before, during, or after transplantation. The selection of the procedure as well as the best timing remains controversial. CASE PRESENTATION:...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7343689/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32642985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40792-020-00897-8 |
_version_ | 1783555800403279872 |
---|---|
author | Elshawy, Mohamed Toshima, Takeo Asayama, Yoshiki Kubo, Yuichiro Ikeda, Shinichiro Ikegami, Toru Arakaki, Shingo Yoshizumi, Tomoharu Mori, Masaki |
author_facet | Elshawy, Mohamed Toshima, Takeo Asayama, Yoshiki Kubo, Yuichiro Ikeda, Shinichiro Ikegami, Toru Arakaki, Shingo Yoshizumi, Tomoharu Mori, Masaki |
author_sort | Elshawy, Mohamed |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To treat small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), many procedures were described for portal flow modulation before, during, or after transplantation. The selection of the procedure as well as the best timing remains controversial. CASE PRESENTATION: A 43-year-old female with end-stage liver disease underwent LDLT with extended left with caudate lobe graft from her donor who was her 41-year-old brother (graft volume/standard liver volume (GV/SLV), 35.7%; graft to recipient weight ratio (GRWR), 0.67%). During the surgery, splenectomy could not be performed owing to severe peri-splenic adhesions to avoid the ruined bleedings. The splenic artery ligation was not also completely done because it was dorsal to the pancreas and difficult to be approached. Finally, adequate portal vein (PV) inflow was confirmed after portal venous thrombectomy. As having post-transplant optional procedures that are accessible for PV flow modulation, any other procedures for PV modulation during LDLT were not done until the postoperative assessment of the graft function and PV flow for possible postoperative modulation of the portal flow accordingly. Postoperative PV flow kept as high as 30 cm/s. By the end of the 1st week, there was a progressive deterioration of the total bilirubin profile (peak as 19.4 mg/dL) and ascitic fluid amount exceeded 1000 mL/day. Therefore, splenic artery embolization was done effectively and safely on the 10th postoperative day (POD) to reverse early allograft dysfunction as PV flow significantly decreased to keep within 20 cm/s and serum total bilirubin levels gradually declined with decreased amounts of ascites below 500 mL on POD 11 and thereafter. The patient was discharged on POD 28 with good condition. CONCLUSIONS: SFSS can be prevented or reversed by the portal inflow modulation, even by post-transplant procedure. This case emphasizes that keeping accessible angiographic treatment options for PV modulation, such as splenic artery embolization, after LDLT is quite feasible. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7343689 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-73436892020-07-13 Post-transplant inflow modulation for early allograft dysfunction after living donor liver transplantation Elshawy, Mohamed Toshima, Takeo Asayama, Yoshiki Kubo, Yuichiro Ikeda, Shinichiro Ikegami, Toru Arakaki, Shingo Yoshizumi, Tomoharu Mori, Masaki Surg Case Rep Case Report BACKGROUND: To treat small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), many procedures were described for portal flow modulation before, during, or after transplantation. The selection of the procedure as well as the best timing remains controversial. CASE PRESENTATION: A 43-year-old female with end-stage liver disease underwent LDLT with extended left with caudate lobe graft from her donor who was her 41-year-old brother (graft volume/standard liver volume (GV/SLV), 35.7%; graft to recipient weight ratio (GRWR), 0.67%). During the surgery, splenectomy could not be performed owing to severe peri-splenic adhesions to avoid the ruined bleedings. The splenic artery ligation was not also completely done because it was dorsal to the pancreas and difficult to be approached. Finally, adequate portal vein (PV) inflow was confirmed after portal venous thrombectomy. As having post-transplant optional procedures that are accessible for PV flow modulation, any other procedures for PV modulation during LDLT were not done until the postoperative assessment of the graft function and PV flow for possible postoperative modulation of the portal flow accordingly. Postoperative PV flow kept as high as 30 cm/s. By the end of the 1st week, there was a progressive deterioration of the total bilirubin profile (peak as 19.4 mg/dL) and ascitic fluid amount exceeded 1000 mL/day. Therefore, splenic artery embolization was done effectively and safely on the 10th postoperative day (POD) to reverse early allograft dysfunction as PV flow significantly decreased to keep within 20 cm/s and serum total bilirubin levels gradually declined with decreased amounts of ascites below 500 mL on POD 11 and thereafter. The patient was discharged on POD 28 with good condition. CONCLUSIONS: SFSS can be prevented or reversed by the portal inflow modulation, even by post-transplant procedure. This case emphasizes that keeping accessible angiographic treatment options for PV modulation, such as splenic artery embolization, after LDLT is quite feasible. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2020-07-08 /pmc/articles/PMC7343689/ /pubmed/32642985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40792-020-00897-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Case Report Elshawy, Mohamed Toshima, Takeo Asayama, Yoshiki Kubo, Yuichiro Ikeda, Shinichiro Ikegami, Toru Arakaki, Shingo Yoshizumi, Tomoharu Mori, Masaki Post-transplant inflow modulation for early allograft dysfunction after living donor liver transplantation |
title | Post-transplant inflow modulation for early allograft dysfunction after living donor liver transplantation |
title_full | Post-transplant inflow modulation for early allograft dysfunction after living donor liver transplantation |
title_fullStr | Post-transplant inflow modulation for early allograft dysfunction after living donor liver transplantation |
title_full_unstemmed | Post-transplant inflow modulation for early allograft dysfunction after living donor liver transplantation |
title_short | Post-transplant inflow modulation for early allograft dysfunction after living donor liver transplantation |
title_sort | post-transplant inflow modulation for early allograft dysfunction after living donor liver transplantation |
topic | Case Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7343689/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32642985 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40792-020-00897-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elshawymohamed posttransplantinflowmodulationforearlyallograftdysfunctionafterlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT toshimatakeo posttransplantinflowmodulationforearlyallograftdysfunctionafterlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT asayamayoshiki posttransplantinflowmodulationforearlyallograftdysfunctionafterlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT kuboyuichiro posttransplantinflowmodulationforearlyallograftdysfunctionafterlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT ikedashinichiro posttransplantinflowmodulationforearlyallograftdysfunctionafterlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT ikegamitoru posttransplantinflowmodulationforearlyallograftdysfunctionafterlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT arakakishingo posttransplantinflowmodulationforearlyallograftdysfunctionafterlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT yoshizumitomoharu posttransplantinflowmodulationforearlyallograftdysfunctionafterlivingdonorlivertransplantation AT morimasaki posttransplantinflowmodulationforearlyallograftdysfunctionafterlivingdonorlivertransplantation |