Cargando…

Impact of the perioperative inotropic support in grown-up congenital heart patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a propensity score adjusted analysis

BACKGROUND: Grown-up congenital heart (GUCH) patients represent a growing population with a high morbidity risk when undergoing reparative surgery. A main preoperative feature is right ventricular failure, which represents a risk factor for postoperative low cardiac output syndrome. Levosimendan has...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mauriat, Philippe, Bojan, Mirela, Soulie, Sylvie, Foulgoc, Hélène, Tafer, Nadir, Ouattara, Alexandre
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7344035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32648069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00709-0
_version_ 1783555871655067648
author Mauriat, Philippe
Bojan, Mirela
Soulie, Sylvie
Foulgoc, Hélène
Tafer, Nadir
Ouattara, Alexandre
author_facet Mauriat, Philippe
Bojan, Mirela
Soulie, Sylvie
Foulgoc, Hélène
Tafer, Nadir
Ouattara, Alexandre
author_sort Mauriat, Philippe
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Grown-up congenital heart (GUCH) patients represent a growing population with a high morbidity risk when undergoing reparative surgery. A main preoperative feature is right ventricular failure, which represents a risk factor for postoperative low cardiac output syndrome. Levosimendan has a potentially beneficial effect. This retrospective study included consecutive GUCH patients with surgeries in a tertiary cardiothoracic centre between 01-01-2013 and 01-10-2017, to test the hypothesis that the postoperative use of levosimendan might be associated with shorter time of mechanical ventilation, when compared with the use of milrinone. To adjust for bias related to the probability of treatment assignment, it uses the inverse propensity score weighting methodology. RESULTS: Overall 363 patients had GUCH surgeries during the study period, their mean age was 31.39 ± 15.31 years, 87 patients were eligible for analysis in the Levosimendan group and 117 in the Milrinone group. The propensity score used pre- and intraoperative variables and resulted in a good balance between covariates. The Levosimendan group included patients with higher preoperative risk scores, a higher prevalence of left and right ventricular failure, who required more often the addition of epinephrine, renal replacement therapy, prolonged mechanical ventilation and intensive care stay. However, after propensity score weighting, patients in the Levosimendan group had shorter durations of mechanical ventilation (average treatment effect − 37.59 h IQR [− 138.85 to − 19.13], p = 0.01) and intensive care stay (average treatment effect − 3.11 days IQR [− 10.03 to − 1.48], p = 0.009). The number of days of additional epinephrine support was shorter and the vasoactive inotropic scores lower. CONCLUSION: We report a beneficial effect in terms of duration of mechanical ventilation and intensive care stay, and on inotropic requirements of the use of levosimendan following GUCH surgeries. The use of levosimendan in this setting requires validation at a larger scale.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7344035
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73440352020-07-09 Impact of the perioperative inotropic support in grown-up congenital heart patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a propensity score adjusted analysis Mauriat, Philippe Bojan, Mirela Soulie, Sylvie Foulgoc, Hélène Tafer, Nadir Ouattara, Alexandre Ann Intensive Care Research BACKGROUND: Grown-up congenital heart (GUCH) patients represent a growing population with a high morbidity risk when undergoing reparative surgery. A main preoperative feature is right ventricular failure, which represents a risk factor for postoperative low cardiac output syndrome. Levosimendan has a potentially beneficial effect. This retrospective study included consecutive GUCH patients with surgeries in a tertiary cardiothoracic centre between 01-01-2013 and 01-10-2017, to test the hypothesis that the postoperative use of levosimendan might be associated with shorter time of mechanical ventilation, when compared with the use of milrinone. To adjust for bias related to the probability of treatment assignment, it uses the inverse propensity score weighting methodology. RESULTS: Overall 363 patients had GUCH surgeries during the study period, their mean age was 31.39 ± 15.31 years, 87 patients were eligible for analysis in the Levosimendan group and 117 in the Milrinone group. The propensity score used pre- and intraoperative variables and resulted in a good balance between covariates. The Levosimendan group included patients with higher preoperative risk scores, a higher prevalence of left and right ventricular failure, who required more often the addition of epinephrine, renal replacement therapy, prolonged mechanical ventilation and intensive care stay. However, after propensity score weighting, patients in the Levosimendan group had shorter durations of mechanical ventilation (average treatment effect − 37.59 h IQR [− 138.85 to − 19.13], p = 0.01) and intensive care stay (average treatment effect − 3.11 days IQR [− 10.03 to − 1.48], p = 0.009). The number of days of additional epinephrine support was shorter and the vasoactive inotropic scores lower. CONCLUSION: We report a beneficial effect in terms of duration of mechanical ventilation and intensive care stay, and on inotropic requirements of the use of levosimendan following GUCH surgeries. The use of levosimendan in this setting requires validation at a larger scale. Springer International Publishing 2020-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7344035/ /pubmed/32648069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00709-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research
Mauriat, Philippe
Bojan, Mirela
Soulie, Sylvie
Foulgoc, Hélène
Tafer, Nadir
Ouattara, Alexandre
Impact of the perioperative inotropic support in grown-up congenital heart patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a propensity score adjusted analysis
title Impact of the perioperative inotropic support in grown-up congenital heart patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a propensity score adjusted analysis
title_full Impact of the perioperative inotropic support in grown-up congenital heart patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a propensity score adjusted analysis
title_fullStr Impact of the perioperative inotropic support in grown-up congenital heart patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a propensity score adjusted analysis
title_full_unstemmed Impact of the perioperative inotropic support in grown-up congenital heart patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a propensity score adjusted analysis
title_short Impact of the perioperative inotropic support in grown-up congenital heart patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a propensity score adjusted analysis
title_sort impact of the perioperative inotropic support in grown-up congenital heart patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a propensity score adjusted analysis
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7344035/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32648069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13613-020-00709-0
work_keys_str_mv AT mauriatphilippe impactoftheperioperativeinotropicsupportingrownupcongenitalheartpatientsundergoingcardiacsurgeryapropensityscoreadjustedanalysis
AT bojanmirela impactoftheperioperativeinotropicsupportingrownupcongenitalheartpatientsundergoingcardiacsurgeryapropensityscoreadjustedanalysis
AT souliesylvie impactoftheperioperativeinotropicsupportingrownupcongenitalheartpatientsundergoingcardiacsurgeryapropensityscoreadjustedanalysis
AT foulgochelene impactoftheperioperativeinotropicsupportingrownupcongenitalheartpatientsundergoingcardiacsurgeryapropensityscoreadjustedanalysis
AT tafernadir impactoftheperioperativeinotropicsupportingrownupcongenitalheartpatientsundergoingcardiacsurgeryapropensityscoreadjustedanalysis
AT ouattaraalexandre impactoftheperioperativeinotropicsupportingrownupcongenitalheartpatientsundergoingcardiacsurgeryapropensityscoreadjustedanalysis