Cargando…

The Clinical Frailty Scale: Do Staff Agree?

The term frailty is being increasingly used by clinicians, however there is no strict consensus on the best screening method. The expectation in England is that all older patients should have the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) completed on admission. This will frequently rely on junior medical staff a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Young, Rebekah L., Smithard, David G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7344510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32630371
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics5020040
_version_ 1783555960683364352
author Young, Rebekah L.
Smithard, David G.
author_facet Young, Rebekah L.
Smithard, David G.
author_sort Young, Rebekah L.
collection PubMed
description The term frailty is being increasingly used by clinicians, however there is no strict consensus on the best screening method. The expectation in England is that all older patients should have the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) completed on admission. This will frequently rely on junior medical staff and nurses, raising the question as to whether there is consistency. We asked 124 members of a multidisciplinary team (consultants, junior doctors, nurses, and allied health professionals; physiotherapists, occupational therapists, dietitians, speech and language therapists) to complete the CFS for seven case scenarios. The majority of the participants, 91/124 (72%), were trainee medical staff, 16 were senior medical staff, 12 were allied health professions, and 6 were nurses. There was broad agreement both between the professions and within the professions, with median CFS scores varying by a maximum of only one point, except in case scenario G, where there was a two-point difference between the most junior trainees (FY1) and the nursing staff. No difference (using the Mann–Whitney U test) was found between the different staff groups, with the median scores and range of scores being similar. This study has confirmed there is agreement between different staff members when calculating the CFS with no specific preceding training.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7344510
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-73445102020-07-14 The Clinical Frailty Scale: Do Staff Agree? Young, Rebekah L. Smithard, David G. Geriatrics (Basel) Communication The term frailty is being increasingly used by clinicians, however there is no strict consensus on the best screening method. The expectation in England is that all older patients should have the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) completed on admission. This will frequently rely on junior medical staff and nurses, raising the question as to whether there is consistency. We asked 124 members of a multidisciplinary team (consultants, junior doctors, nurses, and allied health professionals; physiotherapists, occupational therapists, dietitians, speech and language therapists) to complete the CFS for seven case scenarios. The majority of the participants, 91/124 (72%), were trainee medical staff, 16 were senior medical staff, 12 were allied health professions, and 6 were nurses. There was broad agreement both between the professions and within the professions, with median CFS scores varying by a maximum of only one point, except in case scenario G, where there was a two-point difference between the most junior trainees (FY1) and the nursing staff. No difference (using the Mann–Whitney U test) was found between the different staff groups, with the median scores and range of scores being similar. This study has confirmed there is agreement between different staff members when calculating the CFS with no specific preceding training. MDPI 2020-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7344510/ /pubmed/32630371 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics5020040 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Communication
Young, Rebekah L.
Smithard, David G.
The Clinical Frailty Scale: Do Staff Agree?
title The Clinical Frailty Scale: Do Staff Agree?
title_full The Clinical Frailty Scale: Do Staff Agree?
title_fullStr The Clinical Frailty Scale: Do Staff Agree?
title_full_unstemmed The Clinical Frailty Scale: Do Staff Agree?
title_short The Clinical Frailty Scale: Do Staff Agree?
title_sort clinical frailty scale: do staff agree?
topic Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7344510/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32630371
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics5020040
work_keys_str_mv AT youngrebekahl theclinicalfrailtyscaledostaffagree
AT smitharddavidg theclinicalfrailtyscaledostaffagree
AT youngrebekahl clinicalfrailtyscaledostaffagree
AT smitharddavidg clinicalfrailtyscaledostaffagree